summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/fpga/tests/fpga-bridge-test.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>2026-09-02 15:31:14 -0700
committerKees Cook <kees@kernel.org>2026-09-04 21:37:00 -0700
commit3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d (patch)
treec65086f9bdcd48c6360fb7cb4598bca084da1f32 /drivers/fpga/tests/fpga-bridge-test.c
downloadlinux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.tar.gz
linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.zip
treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversionsgrafted
This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc() family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's "--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control flow indicator I could find. Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc, riscv, and s390 with no new warnings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1] Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/fpga/tests/fpga-bridge-test.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/fpga/tests/fpga-bridge-test.c174
1 files changed, 174 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/tests/fpga-bridge-test.c b/drivers/fpga/tests/fpga-bridge-test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..124ba40e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/fpga/tests/fpga-bridge-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test for the FPGA Bridge
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Red Hat, Inc.
+ *
+ * Author: Marco Pagani <marpagan@redhat.com>
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/device.h>
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+struct bridge_stats {
+ bool enable;
+};
+
+struct bridge_ctx {
+ struct fpga_bridge *bridge;
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct bridge_stats stats;
+};
+
+/*
+ * Wrapper to avoid a cast warning when passing the action function directly
+ * to kunit_add_action().
+ */
+KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(fpga_bridge_unregister_wrapper, fpga_bridge_unregister,
+ struct fpga_bridge *);
+
+static int op_enable_set(struct fpga_bridge *bridge, bool enable)
+{
+ struct bridge_stats *stats = bridge->priv;
+
+ stats->enable = enable;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Fake FPGA bridge that implements only the enable_set op to track
+ * the state.
+ */
+static const struct fpga_bridge_ops fake_bridge_ops = {
+ .enable_set = op_enable_set,
+};
+
+/**
+ * register_test_bridge() - Register a fake FPGA bridge for testing.
+ * @test: KUnit test context object.
+ * @dev_name: name of the kunit device to be registered
+ *
+ * Return: Context of the newly registered FPGA bridge.
+ */
+static struct bridge_ctx *register_test_bridge(struct kunit *test, const char *dev_name)
+{
+ struct bridge_ctx *ctx;
+ int ret;
+
+ ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
+
+ ctx->dev = kunit_device_register(test, dev_name);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->dev);
+
+ ctx->bridge = fpga_bridge_register(ctx->dev, "Fake FPGA bridge", &fake_bridge_ops,
+ &ctx->stats);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ctx->bridge));
+
+ ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, fpga_bridge_unregister_wrapper, ctx->bridge);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ return ctx;
+}
+
+static void fpga_bridge_test_get(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct bridge_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct fpga_bridge *bridge;
+
+ bridge = fpga_bridge_get(ctx->dev, NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, bridge, ctx->bridge);
+
+ bridge = fpga_bridge_get(ctx->dev, NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, PTR_ERR(bridge), -EBUSY);
+
+ fpga_bridge_put(ctx->bridge);
+}
+
+static void fpga_bridge_test_toggle(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct bridge_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = fpga_bridge_disable(ctx->bridge);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, ctx->stats.enable);
+
+ ret = fpga_bridge_enable(ctx->bridge);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, ctx->stats.enable);
+}
+
+/* Test the functions for getting and controlling a list of bridges */
+static void fpga_bridge_test_get_put_list(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct list_head bridge_list;
+ struct bridge_ctx *ctx_0, *ctx_1;
+ int ret;
+
+ ctx_0 = test->priv;
+ ctx_1 = register_test_bridge(test, "fpga-bridge-test-dev-1");
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bridge_list);
+
+ /* Get bridge 0 and add it to the list */
+ ret = fpga_bridge_get_to_list(ctx_0->dev, NULL, &bridge_list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, ctx_0->bridge,
+ list_first_entry_or_null(&bridge_list, struct fpga_bridge, node));
+
+ /* Get bridge 1 and add it to the list */
+ ret = fpga_bridge_get_to_list(ctx_1->dev, NULL, &bridge_list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, ctx_1->bridge,
+ list_first_entry_or_null(&bridge_list, struct fpga_bridge, node));
+
+ /* Disable an then enable both bridges from the list */
+ ret = fpga_bridges_disable(&bridge_list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, ctx_0->stats.enable);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, ctx_1->stats.enable);
+
+ ret = fpga_bridges_enable(&bridge_list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, ctx_0->stats.enable);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, ctx_1->stats.enable);
+
+ /* Put and remove both bridges from the list */
+ fpga_bridges_put(&bridge_list);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&bridge_list));
+}
+
+static int fpga_bridge_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ test->priv = register_test_bridge(test, "fpga-bridge-test-dev-0");
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case fpga_bridge_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(fpga_bridge_test_get),
+ KUNIT_CASE(fpga_bridge_test_toggle),
+ KUNIT_CASE(fpga_bridge_test_get_put_list),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite fpga_bridge_suite = {
+ .name = "fpga_bridge",
+ .init = fpga_bridge_test_init,
+ .test_cases = fpga_bridge_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(fpga_bridge_suite);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KUnit test for the FPGA Bridge");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");