diff options
| author | Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> | 2026-09-21 17:37:22 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2026-09-22 10:49:53 +0200 |
| commit | 0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6 (patch) | |
| tree | 176dc2d685debcfb082c151ee94f2425ac96b364 /crypto/tea.c | |
| download | linux-stable-0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6.tar.gz linux-stable-0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6.zip | |
sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain, to fix LLC mis-scheduling buggrafted
alb_break_llc() decides whether to break LLC preference during active
load balance. It does so by testing that every runnable fair task on the
source rq prefers its LLC:
env->src_rq->nr_pref_llc_running == env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable
But the two counters cover different sets. nr_pref_llc_running is updated
in account_llc_enqueue()/account_llc_dequeue(), next to cfs_rq->nr_queued,
so it follows queued tasks. h_nr_runnable is updated in set_delayed()/
clear_delayed() and drops delay-dequeued tasks.
So under DELAY_DEQUEUE, a preferring task that goes to sleep stays counted
in nr_pref_llc_running while h_nr_runnable falls. The equality then breaks,
alb_break_llc() returns false, and active balance is free to pull a task
off its preferred LLC. Active balance only moves runnable tasks, and this
is the only LLC check it consults: once the stopper runs, LBF_ACTIVE_LB
skips the per-task test in can_migrate_task(). The runnable set is the one
we want.
Fix it on the counter side. A task should be counted in
nr_pref_llc_running exactly while it is both queued on its preferred LLC
(pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed). Define that membership
once in task_pref_llc_runnable(), and adjust the counter only through
pref_llc_running_inc()/pref_llc_running_dec() from the four sites that
change either input: account_llc_enqueue(), account_llc_dequeue(),
set_delayed() and clear_delayed(). Gating every update on the same
predicate keeps the delay, wake and dequeue paths from double-counting
or underflowing; see the comments at those sites for the ordering.
nr_llc_running and sd->llc_counts are not touched and stay on queued
semantics.
Fixes: 714059f79ff0 ("sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260827135000.735138-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com/
Reported-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Suggested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # v7.2.x
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/06af61afedac32e6477f57feb4d658f6c411c3af.1790035273.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'crypto/tea.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | crypto/tea.c | 262 |
1 files changed, 262 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/crypto/tea.c b/crypto/tea.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7c66efcb5 --- /dev/null +++ b/crypto/tea.c @@ -0,0 +1,262 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later +/* + * Cryptographic API. + * + * TEA, XTEA, and XETA crypto algorithms + * + * The TEA and Xtended TEA algorithms were developed by David Wheeler + * and Roger Needham at the Computer Laboratory of Cambridge University. + * + * Due to the order of evaluation in XTEA many people have incorrectly + * implemented it. XETA (XTEA in the wrong order), exists for + * compatibility with these implementations. + * + * Copyright (c) 2004 Aaron Grothe ajgrothe@yahoo.com + */ + +#include <crypto/algapi.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/mm.h> +#include <linux/unaligned.h> +#include <linux/types.h> + +#define TEA_KEY_SIZE 16 +#define TEA_BLOCK_SIZE 8 +#define TEA_ROUNDS 32 +#define TEA_DELTA 0x9e3779b9 + +#define XTEA_KEY_SIZE 16 +#define XTEA_BLOCK_SIZE 8 +#define XTEA_ROUNDS 32 +#define XTEA_DELTA 0x9e3779b9 + +struct tea_ctx { + u32 KEY[4]; +}; + +struct xtea_ctx { + u32 KEY[4]; +}; + +static int tea_setkey(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, const u8 *in_key, + unsigned int key_len) +{ + struct tea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm); + + ctx->KEY[0] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[0]); + ctx->KEY[1] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[4]); + ctx->KEY[2] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[8]); + ctx->KEY[3] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[12]); + + return 0; + +} + +static void tea_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, const u8 *src) +{ + u32 y, z, n, sum = 0; + u32 k0, k1, k2, k3; + struct tea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm); + + y = get_unaligned_le32(&src[0]); + z = get_unaligned_le32(&src[4]); + + k0 = ctx->KEY[0]; + k1 = ctx->KEY[1]; + k2 = ctx->KEY[2]; + k3 = ctx->KEY[3]; + + n = TEA_ROUNDS; + + while (n-- > 0) { + sum += TEA_DELTA; + y += ((z << 4) + k0) ^ (z + sum) ^ ((z >> 5) + k1); + z += ((y << 4) + k2) ^ (y + sum) ^ ((y >> 5) + k3); + } + + put_unaligned_le32(y, &dst[0]); + put_unaligned_le32(z, &dst[4]); +} + +static void tea_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, const u8 *src) +{ + u32 y, z, n, sum; + u32 k0, k1, k2, k3; + struct tea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm); + + y = get_unaligned_le32(&src[0]); + z = get_unaligned_le32(&src[4]); + + k0 = ctx->KEY[0]; + k1 = ctx->KEY[1]; + k2 = ctx->KEY[2]; + k3 = ctx->KEY[3]; + + sum = TEA_DELTA << 5; + + n = TEA_ROUNDS; + + while (n-- > 0) { + z -= ((y << 4) + k2) ^ (y + sum) ^ ((y >> 5) + k3); + y -= ((z << 4) + k0) ^ (z + sum) ^ ((z >> 5) + k1); + sum -= TEA_DELTA; + } + + put_unaligned_le32(y, &dst[0]); + put_unaligned_le32(z, &dst[4]); +} + +static int xtea_setkey(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, const u8 *in_key, + unsigned int key_len) +{ + struct xtea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm); + + ctx->KEY[0] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[0]); + ctx->KEY[1] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[4]); + ctx->KEY[2] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[8]); + ctx->KEY[3] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[12]); + + return 0; + +} + +static void xtea_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, const u8 *src) +{ + u32 y, z, sum = 0; + u32 limit = XTEA_DELTA * XTEA_ROUNDS; + struct xtea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm); + + y = get_unaligned_le32(&src[0]); + z = get_unaligned_le32(&src[4]); + + while (sum != limit) { + y += ((z << 4 ^ z >> 5) + z) ^ (sum + ctx->KEY[sum&3]); + sum += XTEA_DELTA; + z += ((y << 4 ^ y >> 5) + y) ^ (sum + ctx->KEY[sum>>11 &3]); + } + + put_unaligned_le32(y, &dst[0]); + put_unaligned_le32(z, &dst[4]); +} + +static void xtea_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, const u8 *src) +{ + u32 y, z, sum; + struct tea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm); + + y = get_unaligned_le32(&src[0]); + z = get_unaligned_le32(&src[4]); + + sum = XTEA_DELTA * XTEA_ROUNDS; + + while (sum) { + z -= ((y << 4 ^ y >> 5) + y) ^ (sum + ctx->KEY[sum>>11 & 3]); + sum -= XTEA_DELTA; + y -= ((z << 4 ^ z >> 5) + z) ^ (sum + ctx->KEY[sum & 3]); + } + + put_unaligned_le32(y, &dst[0]); + put_unaligned_le32(z, &dst[4]); +} + + +static void xeta_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, const u8 *src) +{ + u32 y, z, sum = 0; + u32 limit = XTEA_DELTA * XTEA_ROUNDS; + struct xtea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm); + + y = get_unaligned_le32(&src[0]); + z = get_unaligned_le32(&src[4]); + + while (sum != limit) { + y += (z << 4 ^ z >> 5) + (z ^ sum) + ctx->KEY[sum&3]; + sum += XTEA_DELTA; + z += (y << 4 ^ y >> 5) + (y ^ sum) + ctx->KEY[sum>>11 &3]; + } + + put_unaligned_le32(y, &dst[0]); + put_unaligned_le32(z, &dst[4]); +} + +static void xeta_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, const u8 *src) +{ + u32 y, z, sum; + struct tea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm); + + y = get_unaligned_le32(&src[0]); + z = get_unaligned_le32(&src[4]); + + sum = XTEA_DELTA * XTEA_ROUNDS; + + while (sum) { + z -= (y << 4 ^ y >> 5) + (y ^ sum) + ctx->KEY[sum>>11 & 3]; + sum -= XTEA_DELTA; + y -= (z << 4 ^ z >> 5) + (z ^ sum) + ctx->KEY[sum & 3]; + } + + put_unaligned_le32(y, &dst[0]); + put_unaligned_le32(z, &dst[4]); +} + +static struct crypto_alg tea_algs[3] = { { + .cra_name = "tea", + .cra_driver_name = "tea-generic", + .cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_CIPHER, + .cra_blocksize = TEA_BLOCK_SIZE, + .cra_ctxsize = sizeof (struct tea_ctx), + .cra_module = THIS_MODULE, + .cra_u = { .cipher = { + .cia_min_keysize = TEA_KEY_SIZE, + .cia_max_keysize = TEA_KEY_SIZE, + .cia_setkey = tea_setkey, + .cia_encrypt = tea_encrypt, + .cia_decrypt = tea_decrypt } } +}, { + .cra_name = "xtea", + .cra_driver_name = "xtea-generic", + .cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_CIPHER, + .cra_blocksize = XTEA_BLOCK_SIZE, + .cra_ctxsize = sizeof (struct xtea_ctx), + .cra_module = THIS_MODULE, + .cra_u = { .cipher = { + .cia_min_keysize = XTEA_KEY_SIZE, + .cia_max_keysize = XTEA_KEY_SIZE, + .cia_setkey = xtea_setkey, + .cia_encrypt = xtea_encrypt, + .cia_decrypt = xtea_decrypt } } +}, { + .cra_name = "xeta", + .cra_driver_name = "xeta-generic", + .cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_CIPHER, + .cra_blocksize = XTEA_BLOCK_SIZE, + .cra_ctxsize = sizeof (struct xtea_ctx), + .cra_module = THIS_MODULE, + .cra_u = { .cipher = { + .cia_min_keysize = XTEA_KEY_SIZE, + .cia_max_keysize = XTEA_KEY_SIZE, + .cia_setkey = xtea_setkey, + .cia_encrypt = xeta_encrypt, + .cia_decrypt = xeta_decrypt } } +} }; + +static int __init tea_mod_init(void) +{ + return crypto_register_algs(tea_algs, ARRAY_SIZE(tea_algs)); +} + +static void __exit tea_mod_fini(void) +{ + crypto_unregister_algs(tea_algs, ARRAY_SIZE(tea_algs)); +} + +MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("tea"); +MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("xtea"); +MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("xeta"); + +module_init(tea_mod_init); +module_exit(tea_mod_fini); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TEA, XTEA & XETA Cryptographic Algorithms"); |
