summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/crypto/tea.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>2026-09-21 17:37:22 -0700
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2026-09-22 10:49:53 +0200
commit0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6 (patch)
tree176dc2d685debcfb082c151ee94f2425ac96b364 /crypto/tea.c
downloadlinux-stable-0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6.tar.gz
linux-stable-0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6.zip
sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain, to fix LLC mis-scheduling buggrafted
alb_break_llc() decides whether to break LLC preference during active load balance. It does so by testing that every runnable fair task on the source rq prefers its LLC: env->src_rq->nr_pref_llc_running == env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable But the two counters cover different sets. nr_pref_llc_running is updated in account_llc_enqueue()/account_llc_dequeue(), next to cfs_rq->nr_queued, so it follows queued tasks. h_nr_runnable is updated in set_delayed()/ clear_delayed() and drops delay-dequeued tasks. So under DELAY_DEQUEUE, a preferring task that goes to sleep stays counted in nr_pref_llc_running while h_nr_runnable falls. The equality then breaks, alb_break_llc() returns false, and active balance is free to pull a task off its preferred LLC. Active balance only moves runnable tasks, and this is the only LLC check it consults: once the stopper runs, LBF_ACTIVE_LB skips the per-task test in can_migrate_task(). The runnable set is the one we want. Fix it on the counter side. A task should be counted in nr_pref_llc_running exactly while it is both queued on its preferred LLC (pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed). Define that membership once in task_pref_llc_runnable(), and adjust the counter only through pref_llc_running_inc()/pref_llc_running_dec() from the four sites that change either input: account_llc_enqueue(), account_llc_dequeue(), set_delayed() and clear_delayed(). Gating every update on the same predicate keeps the delay, wake and dequeue paths from double-counting or underflowing; see the comments at those sites for the ordering. nr_llc_running and sd->llc_counts are not touched and stay on queued semantics. Fixes: 714059f79ff0 ("sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260827135000.735138-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com/ Reported-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com> Suggested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # v7.2.x Link: https://patch.msgid.link/06af61afedac32e6477f57feb4d658f6c411c3af.1790035273.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'crypto/tea.c')
-rw-r--r--crypto/tea.c262
1 files changed, 262 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/crypto/tea.c b/crypto/tea.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7c66efcb5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/crypto/tea.c
@@ -0,0 +1,262 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Cryptographic API.
+ *
+ * TEA, XTEA, and XETA crypto algorithms
+ *
+ * The TEA and Xtended TEA algorithms were developed by David Wheeler
+ * and Roger Needham at the Computer Laboratory of Cambridge University.
+ *
+ * Due to the order of evaluation in XTEA many people have incorrectly
+ * implemented it. XETA (XTEA in the wrong order), exists for
+ * compatibility with these implementations.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2004 Aaron Grothe ajgrothe@yahoo.com
+ */
+
+#include <crypto/algapi.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+#define TEA_KEY_SIZE 16
+#define TEA_BLOCK_SIZE 8
+#define TEA_ROUNDS 32
+#define TEA_DELTA 0x9e3779b9
+
+#define XTEA_KEY_SIZE 16
+#define XTEA_BLOCK_SIZE 8
+#define XTEA_ROUNDS 32
+#define XTEA_DELTA 0x9e3779b9
+
+struct tea_ctx {
+ u32 KEY[4];
+};
+
+struct xtea_ctx {
+ u32 KEY[4];
+};
+
+static int tea_setkey(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, const u8 *in_key,
+ unsigned int key_len)
+{
+ struct tea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
+
+ ctx->KEY[0] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[0]);
+ ctx->KEY[1] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[4]);
+ ctx->KEY[2] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[8]);
+ ctx->KEY[3] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[12]);
+
+ return 0;
+
+}
+
+static void tea_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, const u8 *src)
+{
+ u32 y, z, n, sum = 0;
+ u32 k0, k1, k2, k3;
+ struct tea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
+
+ y = get_unaligned_le32(&src[0]);
+ z = get_unaligned_le32(&src[4]);
+
+ k0 = ctx->KEY[0];
+ k1 = ctx->KEY[1];
+ k2 = ctx->KEY[2];
+ k3 = ctx->KEY[3];
+
+ n = TEA_ROUNDS;
+
+ while (n-- > 0) {
+ sum += TEA_DELTA;
+ y += ((z << 4) + k0) ^ (z + sum) ^ ((z >> 5) + k1);
+ z += ((y << 4) + k2) ^ (y + sum) ^ ((y >> 5) + k3);
+ }
+
+ put_unaligned_le32(y, &dst[0]);
+ put_unaligned_le32(z, &dst[4]);
+}
+
+static void tea_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, const u8 *src)
+{
+ u32 y, z, n, sum;
+ u32 k0, k1, k2, k3;
+ struct tea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
+
+ y = get_unaligned_le32(&src[0]);
+ z = get_unaligned_le32(&src[4]);
+
+ k0 = ctx->KEY[0];
+ k1 = ctx->KEY[1];
+ k2 = ctx->KEY[2];
+ k3 = ctx->KEY[3];
+
+ sum = TEA_DELTA << 5;
+
+ n = TEA_ROUNDS;
+
+ while (n-- > 0) {
+ z -= ((y << 4) + k2) ^ (y + sum) ^ ((y >> 5) + k3);
+ y -= ((z << 4) + k0) ^ (z + sum) ^ ((z >> 5) + k1);
+ sum -= TEA_DELTA;
+ }
+
+ put_unaligned_le32(y, &dst[0]);
+ put_unaligned_le32(z, &dst[4]);
+}
+
+static int xtea_setkey(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, const u8 *in_key,
+ unsigned int key_len)
+{
+ struct xtea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
+
+ ctx->KEY[0] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[0]);
+ ctx->KEY[1] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[4]);
+ ctx->KEY[2] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[8]);
+ ctx->KEY[3] = get_unaligned_le32(&in_key[12]);
+
+ return 0;
+
+}
+
+static void xtea_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, const u8 *src)
+{
+ u32 y, z, sum = 0;
+ u32 limit = XTEA_DELTA * XTEA_ROUNDS;
+ struct xtea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
+
+ y = get_unaligned_le32(&src[0]);
+ z = get_unaligned_le32(&src[4]);
+
+ while (sum != limit) {
+ y += ((z << 4 ^ z >> 5) + z) ^ (sum + ctx->KEY[sum&3]);
+ sum += XTEA_DELTA;
+ z += ((y << 4 ^ y >> 5) + y) ^ (sum + ctx->KEY[sum>>11 &3]);
+ }
+
+ put_unaligned_le32(y, &dst[0]);
+ put_unaligned_le32(z, &dst[4]);
+}
+
+static void xtea_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, const u8 *src)
+{
+ u32 y, z, sum;
+ struct tea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
+
+ y = get_unaligned_le32(&src[0]);
+ z = get_unaligned_le32(&src[4]);
+
+ sum = XTEA_DELTA * XTEA_ROUNDS;
+
+ while (sum) {
+ z -= ((y << 4 ^ y >> 5) + y) ^ (sum + ctx->KEY[sum>>11 & 3]);
+ sum -= XTEA_DELTA;
+ y -= ((z << 4 ^ z >> 5) + z) ^ (sum + ctx->KEY[sum & 3]);
+ }
+
+ put_unaligned_le32(y, &dst[0]);
+ put_unaligned_le32(z, &dst[4]);
+}
+
+
+static void xeta_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, const u8 *src)
+{
+ u32 y, z, sum = 0;
+ u32 limit = XTEA_DELTA * XTEA_ROUNDS;
+ struct xtea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
+
+ y = get_unaligned_le32(&src[0]);
+ z = get_unaligned_le32(&src[4]);
+
+ while (sum != limit) {
+ y += (z << 4 ^ z >> 5) + (z ^ sum) + ctx->KEY[sum&3];
+ sum += XTEA_DELTA;
+ z += (y << 4 ^ y >> 5) + (y ^ sum) + ctx->KEY[sum>>11 &3];
+ }
+
+ put_unaligned_le32(y, &dst[0]);
+ put_unaligned_le32(z, &dst[4]);
+}
+
+static void xeta_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *dst, const u8 *src)
+{
+ u32 y, z, sum;
+ struct tea_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
+
+ y = get_unaligned_le32(&src[0]);
+ z = get_unaligned_le32(&src[4]);
+
+ sum = XTEA_DELTA * XTEA_ROUNDS;
+
+ while (sum) {
+ z -= (y << 4 ^ y >> 5) + (y ^ sum) + ctx->KEY[sum>>11 & 3];
+ sum -= XTEA_DELTA;
+ y -= (z << 4 ^ z >> 5) + (z ^ sum) + ctx->KEY[sum & 3];
+ }
+
+ put_unaligned_le32(y, &dst[0]);
+ put_unaligned_le32(z, &dst[4]);
+}
+
+static struct crypto_alg tea_algs[3] = { {
+ .cra_name = "tea",
+ .cra_driver_name = "tea-generic",
+ .cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_CIPHER,
+ .cra_blocksize = TEA_BLOCK_SIZE,
+ .cra_ctxsize = sizeof (struct tea_ctx),
+ .cra_module = THIS_MODULE,
+ .cra_u = { .cipher = {
+ .cia_min_keysize = TEA_KEY_SIZE,
+ .cia_max_keysize = TEA_KEY_SIZE,
+ .cia_setkey = tea_setkey,
+ .cia_encrypt = tea_encrypt,
+ .cia_decrypt = tea_decrypt } }
+}, {
+ .cra_name = "xtea",
+ .cra_driver_name = "xtea-generic",
+ .cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_CIPHER,
+ .cra_blocksize = XTEA_BLOCK_SIZE,
+ .cra_ctxsize = sizeof (struct xtea_ctx),
+ .cra_module = THIS_MODULE,
+ .cra_u = { .cipher = {
+ .cia_min_keysize = XTEA_KEY_SIZE,
+ .cia_max_keysize = XTEA_KEY_SIZE,
+ .cia_setkey = xtea_setkey,
+ .cia_encrypt = xtea_encrypt,
+ .cia_decrypt = xtea_decrypt } }
+}, {
+ .cra_name = "xeta",
+ .cra_driver_name = "xeta-generic",
+ .cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_CIPHER,
+ .cra_blocksize = XTEA_BLOCK_SIZE,
+ .cra_ctxsize = sizeof (struct xtea_ctx),
+ .cra_module = THIS_MODULE,
+ .cra_u = { .cipher = {
+ .cia_min_keysize = XTEA_KEY_SIZE,
+ .cia_max_keysize = XTEA_KEY_SIZE,
+ .cia_setkey = xtea_setkey,
+ .cia_encrypt = xeta_encrypt,
+ .cia_decrypt = xeta_decrypt } }
+} };
+
+static int __init tea_mod_init(void)
+{
+ return crypto_register_algs(tea_algs, ARRAY_SIZE(tea_algs));
+}
+
+static void __exit tea_mod_fini(void)
+{
+ crypto_unregister_algs(tea_algs, ARRAY_SIZE(tea_algs));
+}
+
+MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("tea");
+MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("xtea");
+MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO("xeta");
+
+module_init(tea_mod_init);
+module_exit(tea_mod_fini);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TEA, XTEA & XETA Cryptographic Algorithms");