objtool: Validate disassembler headers in libopcodes probegrafted

commit 3f2de814c059 ("objtool: Fix libopcodes linking with static libraries")
tested for libopcodes availability by linking a test snippet with a forward
declaration of disassemble_init_for_target().

However, testing symbol linkage with an extern declaration only verifies
the presence of the library (.so/.a) and bypasses checking for development
headers (binutils-dev). On systems where libopcodes is present without
development headers installed, the probe succeeds, enabling BUILD_DISAS.
Subsequent compilation of objtool then fails:

  fatal error: 'bfd.h' file not found
    113 | #include <bfd.h>

Additionally, the probe invokes $(HOSTCC) without $(HOSTCFLAGS), ignoring
any sysroot or include flags specified for the host compiler.

Fix this by including <bfd.h> and <dis-asm.h> directly in the test snippet,
passing $(HOSTCFLAGS) so host compiler options are respected, and defining
PACKAGE="objtool" to satisfy the configuration check in <bfd.h>.

Fixes: 3f2de814c059 ("objtool: Fix libopcodes linking with static libraries")
Fixes: 436326bc525d ("objtool: fix build failure due to missing libopcodes check")
Reported-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Assisted-by: Antigravity:Gemini-Next
Signed-off-by: Ulises Mendez Martinez <umendez@google.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260904150710.2997558-1-umendez@google.com
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 51 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/cpu.c b/arch/x86/lib/cpu.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d39fba72f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/cpu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+
+#include <asm/cpu.h>
+#include <asm/cpuid/leaf_types.h>
+
+static unsigned int __x86_family(unsigned int base_fam, unsigned int ext_fam)
+{
+	if (base_fam == 0xf)
+		base_fam += ext_fam;
+
+	return base_fam;
+}
+
+static unsigned int __x86_model(unsigned int family, unsigned int base_model,
+				unsigned int ext_model)
+{
+	if (family >= 0x6)
+		base_model |= ext_model << 4;
+
+	return base_model;
+}
+
+unsigned int x86_family(unsigned int sig)
+{
+	return __x86_family((sig >> 8) & 0xf, (sig >> 20) & 0xff);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_family);
+
+unsigned int x86_model(unsigned int sig)
+{
+	return __x86_model(x86_family(sig), (sig >> 4) & 0xf, (sig >> 16) & 0xf);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_model);
+
+unsigned int x86_stepping(unsigned int sig)
+{
+	return sig & 0xf;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_stepping);
+
+unsigned int cpuid_family(const struct leaf_0x1_0 *l)
+{
+	return __x86_family(l->base_family_id, l->ext_family);
+}
+
+unsigned int cpuid_model(const struct leaf_0x1_0 *l)
+{
+	return __x86_model(cpuid_family(l), l->base_model, l->ext_model);
+}