kbuild: rust: keep Rust objects out of Clang LTO with inline helpersgrafted

Under `CONFIG_LTO_CLANG` + `CONFIG_RUST_INLINE_HELPERS`, one may hit
`objtool` errors such as:

    vmlinux.o: error: objtool: _R..._3Gsp4boot+0xd6a:
    can't find jump dest instruction at .text._R..._3Gsp4boot+0x1dfd

The reason is that in such builds, the Clang invocation that compiles
the combined Rust plus helpers bitcode emits LLVM bitcode (again) --
the final code generation happens in the linker's LTO step, which the
`-mllvm` trap options passed to Clang do not reach.

This, in turn, means that unreachable traps are missing, and the
impossible paths do not merely fallthrough to the next symbol, but past
the end of their own section, since LTO builds place each function in
its own section.

Thus filter `CC_FLAGS_LTO` out of the Clang invocation, so that it always
emits machine code directly, with the traps in place.

Assisted-by: LLM
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@google.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3a2486cc1da5 ("kbuild: rust: provide an option to inline C helpers into Rust")
Acked-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260816133233.197500-2-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 65 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..04165b7a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Spin and read/write lock operations.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2001-2004 Paul Mackerras <paulus@au.ibm.com>, IBM
+ * Copyright (C) 2001 Anton Blanchard <anton@au.ibm.com>, IBM
+ * Copyright (C) 2002 Dave Engebretsen <engebret@us.ibm.com>, IBM
+ *   Rework to support virtual processors
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+
+/* waiting for a spinlock... */
+#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR)
+#include <asm/hvcall.h>
+#include <asm/smp.h>
+
+void splpar_spin_yield(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	unsigned int lock_value, holder_cpu, yield_count;
+
+	lock_value = lock->slock;
+	if (lock_value == 0)
+		return;
+	holder_cpu = lock_value & 0xffff;
+	BUG_ON(holder_cpu >= NR_CPUS);
+
+	yield_count = yield_count_of(holder_cpu);
+	if ((yield_count & 1) == 0)
+		return;		/* virtual cpu is currently running */
+	rmb();
+	if (lock->slock != lock_value)
+		return;		/* something has changed */
+	yield_to_preempted(holder_cpu, yield_count);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(splpar_spin_yield);
+
+/*
+ * Waiting for a read lock or a write lock on a rwlock...
+ * This turns out to be the same for read and write locks, since
+ * we only know the holder if it is write-locked.
+ */
+void splpar_rw_yield(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	int lock_value;
+	unsigned int holder_cpu, yield_count;
+
+	lock_value = rw->lock;
+	if (lock_value >= 0)
+		return;		/* no write lock at present */
+	holder_cpu = lock_value & 0xffff;
+	BUG_ON(holder_cpu >= NR_CPUS);
+
+	yield_count = yield_count_of(holder_cpu);
+	if ((yield_count & 1) == 0)
+		return;		/* virtual cpu is currently running */
+	rmb();
+	if (rw->lock != lock_value)
+		return;		/* something has changed */
+	yield_to_preempted(holder_cpu, yield_count);
+}
+#endif