diff options
| author | Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org> | 2026-09-02 15:31:14 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> | 2026-09-04 21:37:00 -0700 |
| commit | 3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d (patch) | |
| tree | c65086f9bdcd48c6360fb7cb4598bca084da1f32 /arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c | |
| download | linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.tar.gz linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.zip | |
treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversionsgrafted
This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc()
family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in
scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci
This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first
kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the
first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h
scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's
"--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped
to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control
flow indicator I could find.
Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc,
riscv, and s390 with no new warnings.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1]
Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c | 65 |
1 files changed, 65 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..04165b7a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later +/* + * Spin and read/write lock operations. + * + * Copyright (C) 2001-2004 Paul Mackerras <paulus@au.ibm.com>, IBM + * Copyright (C) 2001 Anton Blanchard <anton@au.ibm.com>, IBM + * Copyright (C) 2002 Dave Engebretsen <engebret@us.ibm.com>, IBM + * Rework to support virtual processors + */ + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/spinlock.h> +#include <linux/export.h> +#include <linux/smp.h> + +/* waiting for a spinlock... */ +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR) +#include <asm/hvcall.h> +#include <asm/smp.h> + +void splpar_spin_yield(arch_spinlock_t *lock) +{ + unsigned int lock_value, holder_cpu, yield_count; + + lock_value = lock->slock; + if (lock_value == 0) + return; + holder_cpu = lock_value & 0xffff; + BUG_ON(holder_cpu >= NR_CPUS); + + yield_count = yield_count_of(holder_cpu); + if ((yield_count & 1) == 0) + return; /* virtual cpu is currently running */ + rmb(); + if (lock->slock != lock_value) + return; /* something has changed */ + yield_to_preempted(holder_cpu, yield_count); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(splpar_spin_yield); + +/* + * Waiting for a read lock or a write lock on a rwlock... + * This turns out to be the same for read and write locks, since + * we only know the holder if it is write-locked. + */ +void splpar_rw_yield(arch_rwlock_t *rw) +{ + int lock_value; + unsigned int holder_cpu, yield_count; + + lock_value = rw->lock; + if (lock_value >= 0) + return; /* no write lock at present */ + holder_cpu = lock_value & 0xffff; + BUG_ON(holder_cpu >= NR_CPUS); + + yield_count = yield_count_of(holder_cpu); + if ((yield_count & 1) == 0) + return; /* virtual cpu is currently running */ + rmb(); + if (rw->lock != lock_value) + return; /* something has changed */ + yield_to_preempted(holder_cpu, yield_count); +} +#endif |
