summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/arm/lib/io-writesw-armv3.S
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>2026-09-02 15:31:14 -0700
committerKees Cook <kees@kernel.org>2026-09-04 21:37:00 -0700
commit3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d (patch)
treec65086f9bdcd48c6360fb7cb4598bca084da1f32 /arch/arm/lib/io-writesw-armv3.S
downloadlinux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.tar.gz
linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.zip
treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversionsgrafted
This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc() family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's "--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control flow indicator I could find. Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc, riscv, and s390 with no new warnings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1] Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/lib/io-writesw-armv3.S')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/lib/io-writesw-armv3.S123
1 files changed, 123 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/io-writesw-armv3.S b/arch/arm/lib/io-writesw-armv3.S
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4cabbee7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/io-writesw-armv3.S
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * linux/arch/arm/lib/io-writesw-armv3.S
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 1995-2000 Russell King
+ */
+#include <linux/linkage.h>
+#include <asm/assembler.h>
+
+.Loutsw_bad_alignment:
+ adr r0, .Loutsw_bad_align_msg
+ mov r2, lr
+ b panic
+.Loutsw_bad_align_msg:
+ .asciz "outsw: bad buffer alignment (0x%p, lr=0x%08lX)\n"
+ .align
+
+.Loutsw_align: tst r1, #1
+ bne .Loutsw_bad_alignment
+
+ add r1, r1, #2
+
+ ldr r3, [r1, #-4]
+ mov r3, r3, lsr #16
+ orr r3, r3, r3, lsl #16
+ str r3, [r0]
+ subs r2, r2, #1
+ reteq lr
+
+ENTRY(__raw_writesw)
+ teq r2, #0 @ do we have to check for the zero len?
+ reteq lr
+ tst r1, #3
+ bne .Loutsw_align
+
+ stmfd sp!, {r4, r5, r6, lr}
+
+ subs r2, r2, #8
+ bmi .Lno_outsw_8
+
+.Loutsw_8_lp: ldmia r1!, {r3, r4, r5, r6}
+
+ mov ip, r3, lsl #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsr #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+ mov ip, r3, lsr #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsl #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+ mov ip, r4, lsl #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsr #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+ mov ip, r4, lsr #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsl #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+ mov ip, r5, lsl #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsr #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+ mov ip, r5, lsr #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsl #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+ mov ip, r6, lsl #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsr #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+ mov ip, r6, lsr #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsl #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+ subs r2, r2, #8
+ bpl .Loutsw_8_lp
+
+ tst r2, #7
+ ldmfdeq sp!, {r4, r5, r6, pc}
+
+.Lno_outsw_8: tst r2, #4
+ beq .Lno_outsw_4
+
+ ldmia r1!, {r3, r4}
+
+ mov ip, r3, lsl #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsr #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+ mov ip, r3, lsr #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsl #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+ mov ip, r4, lsl #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsr #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+ mov ip, r4, lsr #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsl #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+.Lno_outsw_4: tst r2, #2
+ beq .Lno_outsw_2
+
+ ldr r3, [r1], #4
+
+ mov ip, r3, lsl #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsr #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+ mov ip, r3, lsr #16
+ orr ip, ip, ip, lsl #16
+ str ip, [r0]
+
+.Lno_outsw_2: tst r2, #1
+
+ ldrne r3, [r1]
+
+ movne ip, r3, lsl #16
+ orrne ip, ip, ip, lsr #16
+ strne ip, [r0]
+
+ ldmfd sp!, {r4, r5, r6, pc}