summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>2026-09-02 15:31:14 -0700
committerKees Cook <kees@kernel.org>2026-09-04 21:37:00 -0700
commit3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d (patch)
treec65086f9bdcd48c6360fb7cb4598bca084da1f32 /arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S
downloadlinux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.tar.gz
linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.zip
treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversionsgrafted
This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc() family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's "--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control flow indicator I could find. Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc, riscv, and s390 with no new warnings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1] Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S91
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S b/arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e2ae312f0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * linux/arch/arm/lib/io-writesb.S
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 1995-2000 Russell King
+ */
+#include <linux/linkage.h>
+#include <asm/assembler.h>
+
+ .macro outword, rd
+#ifndef __ARMEB__
+ strb \rd, [r0]
+ mov \rd, \rd, lsr #8
+ strb \rd, [r0]
+ mov \rd, \rd, lsr #8
+ strb \rd, [r0]
+ mov \rd, \rd, lsr #8
+ strb \rd, [r0]
+#else
+ mov lr, \rd, lsr #24
+ strb lr, [r0]
+ mov lr, \rd, lsr #16
+ strb lr, [r0]
+ mov lr, \rd, lsr #8
+ strb lr, [r0]
+ strb \rd, [r0]
+#endif
+ .endm
+
+.Loutsb_align: rsb ip, ip, #4
+ cmp ip, r2
+ movgt ip, r2
+ cmp ip, #2
+ ldrb r3, [r1], #1
+ strb r3, [r0]
+ ldrbge r3, [r1], #1
+ strbge r3, [r0]
+ ldrbgt r3, [r1], #1
+ strbgt r3, [r0]
+ subs r2, r2, ip
+ bne .Loutsb_aligned
+
+ENTRY(__raw_writesb)
+ teq r2, #0 @ do we have to check for the zero len?
+ reteq lr
+ ands ip, r1, #3
+ bne .Loutsb_align
+
+.Loutsb_aligned:
+ stmfd sp!, {r4, r5, lr}
+
+ subs r2, r2, #16
+ bmi .Loutsb_no_16
+
+.Loutsb_16_lp: ldmia r1!, {r3, r4, r5, ip}
+ outword r3
+ outword r4
+ outword r5
+ outword ip
+ subs r2, r2, #16
+ bpl .Loutsb_16_lp
+
+ tst r2, #15
+ ldmfdeq sp!, {r4, r5, pc}
+
+.Loutsb_no_16: tst r2, #8
+ beq .Loutsb_no_8
+
+ ldmia r1!, {r3, r4}
+ outword r3
+ outword r4
+
+.Loutsb_no_8: tst r2, #4
+ beq .Loutsb_no_4
+
+ ldr r3, [r1], #4
+ outword r3
+
+.Loutsb_no_4: ands r2, r2, #3
+ ldmfdeq sp!, {r4, r5, pc}
+
+ cmp r2, #2
+ ldrb r3, [r1], #1
+ strb r3, [r0]
+ ldrbge r3, [r1], #1
+ strbge r3, [r0]
+ ldrbgt r3, [r1]
+ strbgt r3, [r0]
+
+ ldmfd sp!, {r4, r5, pc}
+ENDPROC(__raw_writesb)