diff options
| author | Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org> | 2026-09-02 15:31:14 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> | 2026-09-04 21:37:00 -0700 |
| commit | 3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d (patch) | |
| tree | c65086f9bdcd48c6360fb7cb4598bca084da1f32 /arch/arm/lib/io-readsw-armv3.S | |
| download | linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.tar.gz linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.zip | |
treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversionsgrafted
This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc()
family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in
scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci
This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first
kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the
first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h
scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's
"--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped
to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control
flow indicator I could find.
Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc,
riscv, and s390 with no new warnings.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1]
Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/lib/io-readsw-armv3.S')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/lib/io-readsw-armv3.S | 103 |
1 files changed, 103 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/io-readsw-armv3.S b/arch/arm/lib/io-readsw-armv3.S new file mode 100644 index 000000000..266043610 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/lib/io-readsw-armv3.S @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +/* + * linux/arch/arm/lib/io-readsw-armv3.S + * + * Copyright (C) 1995-2000 Russell King + */ +#include <linux/linkage.h> +#include <asm/assembler.h> + +.Linsw_bad_alignment: + adr r0, .Linsw_bad_align_msg + mov r2, lr + b panic +.Linsw_bad_align_msg: + .asciz "insw: bad buffer alignment (0x%p, lr=0x%08lX)\n" + .align + +.Linsw_align: tst r1, #1 + bne .Linsw_bad_alignment + + ldr r3, [r0] + strb r3, [r1], #1 + mov r3, r3, lsr #8 + strb r3, [r1], #1 + + subs r2, r2, #1 + reteq lr + +ENTRY(__raw_readsw) + teq r2, #0 @ do we have to check for the zero len? + reteq lr + tst r1, #3 + bne .Linsw_align + +.Linsw_aligned: mov ip, #0xff + orr ip, ip, ip, lsl #8 + stmfd sp!, {r4, r5, r6, lr} + + subs r2, r2, #8 + bmi .Lno_insw_8 + +.Linsw_8_lp: ldr r3, [r0] + and r3, r3, ip + ldr r4, [r0] + orr r3, r3, r4, lsl #16 + + ldr r4, [r0] + and r4, r4, ip + ldr r5, [r0] + orr r4, r4, r5, lsl #16 + + ldr r5, [r0] + and r5, r5, ip + ldr r6, [r0] + orr r5, r5, r6, lsl #16 + + ldr r6, [r0] + and r6, r6, ip + ldr lr, [r0] + orr r6, r6, lr, lsl #16 + + stmia r1!, {r3 - r6} + + subs r2, r2, #8 + bpl .Linsw_8_lp + + tst r2, #7 + ldmfdeq sp!, {r4, r5, r6, pc} + +.Lno_insw_8: tst r2, #4 + beq .Lno_insw_4 + + ldr r3, [r0] + and r3, r3, ip + ldr r4, [r0] + orr r3, r3, r4, lsl #16 + + ldr r4, [r0] + and r4, r4, ip + ldr r5, [r0] + orr r4, r4, r5, lsl #16 + + stmia r1!, {r3, r4} + +.Lno_insw_4: tst r2, #2 + beq .Lno_insw_2 + + ldr r3, [r0] + and r3, r3, ip + ldr r4, [r0] + orr r3, r3, r4, lsl #16 + + str r3, [r1], #4 + +.Lno_insw_2: tst r2, #1 + ldrne r3, [r0] + strbne r3, [r1], #1 + movne r3, r3, lsr #8 + strbne r3, [r1] + + ldmfd sp!, {r4, r5, r6, pc} + + |
