kbuild: rust: keep Rust objects out of Clang LTO with inline helpersgrafted

Under `CONFIG_LTO_CLANG` + `CONFIG_RUST_INLINE_HELPERS`, one may hit
`objtool` errors such as:

    vmlinux.o: error: objtool: _R..._3Gsp4boot+0xd6a:
    can't find jump dest instruction at .text._R..._3Gsp4boot+0x1dfd

The reason is that in such builds, the Clang invocation that compiles
the combined Rust plus helpers bitcode emits LLVM bitcode (again) --
the final code generation happens in the linker's LTO step, which the
`-mllvm` trap options passed to Clang do not reach.

This, in turn, means that unreachable traps are missing, and the
impossible paths do not merely fallthrough to the next symbol, but past
the end of their own section, since LTO builds place each function in
its own section.

Thus filter `CC_FLAGS_LTO` out of the Clang invocation, so that it always
emits machine code directly, with the traps in place.

Assisted-by: LLM
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@google.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3a2486cc1da5 ("kbuild: rust: provide an option to inline C helpers into Rust")
Acked-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260816133233.197500-2-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 166 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c b/arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..78b6850a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ *  linux/arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c
+ *
+ *  Copyright (C) 1995  Linus Torvalds
+ */
+
+/*
+ * This is a reasonably optimized memcpy() routine.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Note that the C code is written to be optimized into good assembly. However,
+ * at this point gcc is unable to sanely compile "if (n >= 0)", resulting in a
+ * explicit compare against 0 (instead of just using the proper "blt reg, xx" or
+ * "bge reg, xx"). I hope alpha-gcc will be fixed to notice this eventually..
+ */
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+
+/*
+ * This should be done in one go with ldq_u*2/mask/stq_u. Do it
+ * with a macro so that we can fix it up later..
+ */
+#define ALIGN_DEST_TO8_UP(d,s,n) \
+	while (d & 7) { \
+		if (n <= 0) return; \
+		n--; \
+		*(char *) d = *(char *) s; \
+		d++; s++; \
+	}
+#define ALIGN_DEST_TO8_DN(d,s,n) \
+	while (d & 7) { \
+		if (n <= 0) return; \
+		n--; \
+		d--; s--; \
+		*(char *) d = *(char *) s; \
+	}
+
+/*
+ * This should similarly be done with ldq_u*2/mask/stq. The destination
+ * is aligned, but we don't fill in a full quad-word
+ */
+#define DO_REST_UP(d,s,n) \
+	while (n > 0) { \
+		n--; \
+		*(char *) d = *(char *) s; \
+		d++; s++; \
+	}
+#define DO_REST_DN(d,s,n) \
+	while (n > 0) { \
+		n--; \
+		d--; s--; \
+		*(char *) d = *(char *) s; \
+	}
+
+/*
+ * This should be done with ldq/mask/stq. The source and destination are
+ * aligned, but we don't fill in a full quad-word
+ */
+#define DO_REST_ALIGNED_UP(d,s,n) DO_REST_UP(d,s,n)
+#define DO_REST_ALIGNED_DN(d,s,n) DO_REST_DN(d,s,n)
+
+/*
+ * This does unaligned memory copies. We want to avoid storing to
+ * an unaligned address, as that would do a read-modify-write cycle.
+ * We also want to avoid double-reading the unaligned reads.
+ *
+ * Note the ordering to try to avoid load (and address generation) latencies.
+ */
+static inline void __memcpy_unaligned_up (unsigned long d, unsigned long s,
+					  long n)
+{
+	ALIGN_DEST_TO8_UP(d,s,n);
+	n -= 8;			/* to avoid compare against 8 in the loop */
+	if (n >= 0) {
+		unsigned long low_word, high_word;
+		__asm__("ldq_u %0,%1":"=r" (low_word):"m" (*(unsigned long *) s));
+		do {
+			unsigned long tmp;
+			__asm__("ldq_u %0,%1":"=r" (high_word):"m" (*(unsigned long *)(s+8)));
+			n -= 8;
+			__asm__("extql %1,%2,%0"
+				:"=r" (low_word)
+				:"r" (low_word), "r" (s));
+			__asm__("extqh %1,%2,%0"
+				:"=r" (tmp)
+				:"r" (high_word), "r" (s));
+			s += 8;
+			*(unsigned long *) d = low_word | tmp;
+			d += 8;
+			low_word = high_word;
+		} while (n >= 0);
+	}
+	n += 8;
+	DO_REST_UP(d,s,n);
+}
+
+static inline void __memcpy_unaligned_dn (unsigned long d, unsigned long s,
+					  long n)
+{
+	/* I don't understand AXP assembler well enough for this. -Tim */
+	s += n;
+	d += n;
+	while (n--)
+		* (char *) --d = * (char *) --s;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Hmm.. Strange. The __asm__ here is there to make gcc use an integer register
+ * for the load-store. I don't know why, but it would seem that using a floating
+ * point register for the move seems to slow things down (very small difference,
+ * though).
+ *
+ * Note the ordering to try to avoid load (and address generation) latencies.
+ */
+static inline void __memcpy_aligned_up (unsigned long d, unsigned long s,
+					long n)
+{
+	ALIGN_DEST_TO8_UP(d,s,n);
+	n -= 8;
+	while (n >= 0) {
+		unsigned long tmp;
+		__asm__("ldq %0,%1":"=r" (tmp):"m" (*(unsigned long *) s));
+		n -= 8;
+		s += 8;
+		*(unsigned long *) d = tmp;
+		d += 8;
+	}
+	n += 8;
+	DO_REST_ALIGNED_UP(d,s,n);
+}
+static inline void __memcpy_aligned_dn (unsigned long d, unsigned long s,
+					long n)
+{
+	s += n;
+	d += n;
+	ALIGN_DEST_TO8_DN(d,s,n);
+	n -= 8;
+	while (n >= 0) {
+		unsigned long tmp;
+		s -= 8;
+		__asm__("ldq %0,%1":"=r" (tmp):"m" (*(unsigned long *) s));
+		n -= 8;
+		d -= 8;
+		*(unsigned long *) d = tmp;
+	}
+	n += 8;
+	DO_REST_ALIGNED_DN(d,s,n);
+}
+
+#undef memcpy
+
+void * memcpy(void * dest, const void *src, size_t n)
+{
+	if (!(((unsigned long) dest ^ (unsigned long) src) & 7)) {
+		__memcpy_aligned_up ((unsigned long) dest, (unsigned long) src,
+				     n);
+		return dest;
+	}
+	__memcpy_unaligned_up ((unsigned long) dest, (unsigned long) src, n);
+	return dest;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy);