ftrace: Synchronize the initialization of ftrace_opsgrafted

There's some internal state that ftrace_ops needs to have set, but since
it can be declared outside of the ftrace.c code, it calls
ftrace_ops_init() on the ops in every global function. The issue is that
if two tasks call it on the same ops at the same time it is possible to
have the initialization of one corrupt the initialization of the other
call.

Create a ops_mutex to use to synchronize every initialization of the
ftrace_ops. The mutex is taken within checking the ftrace_ops flag that
states it was initializied but the flag is checked again after the mutex
has been taken. Checking first outside the mutex allows it to shortcut
having to take the mutex. But then the check needs to be done again after
the mute is taken in case of races.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260902095501.6b59af20@gandalf.local.home
Fixes: f04f24fb7e48d ("ftrace, kprobes: Fix a deadlock on ftrace_regex_lock")
Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Close: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260829025528.49A831F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

1 files changed, 166 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c b/arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..78b6850a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ *  linux/arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c
+ *
+ *  Copyright (C) 1995  Linus Torvalds
+ */
+
+/*
+ * This is a reasonably optimized memcpy() routine.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Note that the C code is written to be optimized into good assembly. However,
+ * at this point gcc is unable to sanely compile "if (n >= 0)", resulting in a
+ * explicit compare against 0 (instead of just using the proper "blt reg, xx" or
+ * "bge reg, xx"). I hope alpha-gcc will be fixed to notice this eventually..
+ */
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+
+/*
+ * This should be done in one go with ldq_u*2/mask/stq_u. Do it
+ * with a macro so that we can fix it up later..
+ */
+#define ALIGN_DEST_TO8_UP(d,s,n) \
+	while (d & 7) { \
+		if (n <= 0) return; \
+		n--; \
+		*(char *) d = *(char *) s; \
+		d++; s++; \
+	}
+#define ALIGN_DEST_TO8_DN(d,s,n) \
+	while (d & 7) { \
+		if (n <= 0) return; \
+		n--; \
+		d--; s--; \
+		*(char *) d = *(char *) s; \
+	}
+
+/*
+ * This should similarly be done with ldq_u*2/mask/stq. The destination
+ * is aligned, but we don't fill in a full quad-word
+ */
+#define DO_REST_UP(d,s,n) \
+	while (n > 0) { \
+		n--; \
+		*(char *) d = *(char *) s; \
+		d++; s++; \
+	}
+#define DO_REST_DN(d,s,n) \
+	while (n > 0) { \
+		n--; \
+		d--; s--; \
+		*(char *) d = *(char *) s; \
+	}
+
+/*
+ * This should be done with ldq/mask/stq. The source and destination are
+ * aligned, but we don't fill in a full quad-word
+ */
+#define DO_REST_ALIGNED_UP(d,s,n) DO_REST_UP(d,s,n)
+#define DO_REST_ALIGNED_DN(d,s,n) DO_REST_DN(d,s,n)
+
+/*
+ * This does unaligned memory copies. We want to avoid storing to
+ * an unaligned address, as that would do a read-modify-write cycle.
+ * We also want to avoid double-reading the unaligned reads.
+ *
+ * Note the ordering to try to avoid load (and address generation) latencies.
+ */
+static inline void __memcpy_unaligned_up (unsigned long d, unsigned long s,
+					  long n)
+{
+	ALIGN_DEST_TO8_UP(d,s,n);
+	n -= 8;			/* to avoid compare against 8 in the loop */
+	if (n >= 0) {
+		unsigned long low_word, high_word;
+		__asm__("ldq_u %0,%1":"=r" (low_word):"m" (*(unsigned long *) s));
+		do {
+			unsigned long tmp;
+			__asm__("ldq_u %0,%1":"=r" (high_word):"m" (*(unsigned long *)(s+8)));
+			n -= 8;
+			__asm__("extql %1,%2,%0"
+				:"=r" (low_word)
+				:"r" (low_word), "r" (s));
+			__asm__("extqh %1,%2,%0"
+				:"=r" (tmp)
+				:"r" (high_word), "r" (s));
+			s += 8;
+			*(unsigned long *) d = low_word | tmp;
+			d += 8;
+			low_word = high_word;
+		} while (n >= 0);
+	}
+	n += 8;
+	DO_REST_UP(d,s,n);
+}
+
+static inline void __memcpy_unaligned_dn (unsigned long d, unsigned long s,
+					  long n)
+{
+	/* I don't understand AXP assembler well enough for this. -Tim */
+	s += n;
+	d += n;
+	while (n--)
+		* (char *) --d = * (char *) --s;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Hmm.. Strange. The __asm__ here is there to make gcc use an integer register
+ * for the load-store. I don't know why, but it would seem that using a floating
+ * point register for the move seems to slow things down (very small difference,
+ * though).
+ *
+ * Note the ordering to try to avoid load (and address generation) latencies.
+ */
+static inline void __memcpy_aligned_up (unsigned long d, unsigned long s,
+					long n)
+{
+	ALIGN_DEST_TO8_UP(d,s,n);
+	n -= 8;
+	while (n >= 0) {
+		unsigned long tmp;
+		__asm__("ldq %0,%1":"=r" (tmp):"m" (*(unsigned long *) s));
+		n -= 8;
+		s += 8;
+		*(unsigned long *) d = tmp;
+		d += 8;
+	}
+	n += 8;
+	DO_REST_ALIGNED_UP(d,s,n);
+}
+static inline void __memcpy_aligned_dn (unsigned long d, unsigned long s,
+					long n)
+{
+	s += n;
+	d += n;
+	ALIGN_DEST_TO8_DN(d,s,n);
+	n -= 8;
+	while (n >= 0) {
+		unsigned long tmp;
+		s -= 8;
+		__asm__("ldq %0,%1":"=r" (tmp):"m" (*(unsigned long *) s));
+		n -= 8;
+		d -= 8;
+		*(unsigned long *) d = tmp;
+	}
+	n += 8;
+	DO_REST_ALIGNED_DN(d,s,n);
+}
+
+#undef memcpy
+
+void * memcpy(void * dest, const void *src, size_t n)
+{
+	if (!(((unsigned long) dest ^ (unsigned long) src) & 7)) {
+		__memcpy_aligned_up ((unsigned long) dest, (unsigned long) src,
+				     n);
+		return dest;
+	}
+	__memcpy_unaligned_up ((unsigned long) dest, (unsigned long) src, n);
+	return dest;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy);