diff options
| author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2026-08-30 09:22:00 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2026-08-30 09:22:00 -0700 |
| commit | 034dd340b08be1f2f0477ad16131d609f9dbd53c (patch) | |
| tree | 2536f4b2d7893ccd916b5abdf3c454ad6edc03c2 /Documentation/spi | |
| download | linux-stable-034dd340b08be1f2f0477ad16131d609f9dbd53c.tar.gz linux-stable-034dd340b08be1f2f0477ad16131d609f9dbd53c.zip | |
Merge tag 'trace-v7.3-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-tracegrafted
Pull tracing fixes from Steven Rostedt:
- Fix error output of boot instance creation failure
Currently if a boot instance creation fails, instead of printing out
the name of the instance that failed, it prints "(null)". That is
because it prints "cur_str" that had already been processed by
strsep(). Print the saved name instead.
While at it, print the error code of the failure.
- Fix use-after-free for same named historgrams
Histograms can be named so that they can be used in multiple events.
But if the named histogram has a variable attached, the second event
that uses the named histogram which duplicates it and needs to free
the original after duplication leaves the old variable in place and
still visible. If another histogram uses than variable, it will use
the stale one which will try to reference the freed duplicate
histogram and crash the kernel.
Free the duplicate variables along with the duplicated histogram
data.
- Check return value of kthread_run() in event self test
The events self tests uses a kthread for testing but does not check
if it succeeded in creating a kthread. If the kthread creation were
to fail, the code will still try to call kthread_stop() on the error
returned.
- Fix race between reading trace_pipe and updating subbuffer size
If a user is reading the trace_pipe file at the same time they update
the ring buffer sub-buffer size, can cause the trace_pipe read to
read stale data. Add trace_access_lock() around updating the ring
buffer sub-buffer size.
- Fix eventfs_inode on failure path in creation of the events directory
In the creation of the "events" directory, if after allocating the
eventfs_inode a failure is detected, it calls cleanup_ei() which
calls free_ei(). The free_ei() will test if eventfs_inode being freed
has no children. It is a bug if it does. But on the failure case of
the creation of the "events" directory, the children lists have not
yet been initialized and the free will trigger a warning because
list_empty() on an uninitialized list returns false.
Move the initialization into init_ei() where it makes more sense and
makes sure that a created eventfs_inode has its lists initialized
upon creation.
- Check return value of kthread_run() in ftrace direct sample code
The sample code that shows how to use the ftrace direct calls does
not test the return of kthread_run() to see if it succeeds. Return a
failure if the kthread_run() doesn't succeed.
- Clear user events state on fork in case of alloc failure
On fork, the child gets a pointer to the parent's user events state.
It makes a copy of it then updates the child's pointer to it. But if
the allocation fails, the duplication function leaves the child with
a pointer to its parent's descriptor. When the child cleans up its
data, it will free the parent's descriptor while the parent is still
using it.
In the duplication function, set the child's user_event_mm to NULL
before testing if the allocation succeeded, and when it exits it will
not free the parent's descriptor.
- Fix retry exhaustion in simple ring buffer reader swap
simple_ring_buffer_swap_reader_page() starts with retry set to 8 and
post-decrements it only after a failed link replacement. On the final
attempt, a successful replacement leaves retry at zero, while a
failed replacement leaves it at -1.
But the check for success expects the retry value to be non-zero and
exits with an error on zero. This is the opposite result. Fix it.
- Fail nicely when the remote swap_reader_page() returns an error
Currently, if the swap_reader_page() of a remote buffer fails, it
triggers a WARN_ON_ONCE() and continues normally. Instead, have it
exit with an error and a pr_warn() print instead of a full WARNING.
* tag 'trace-v7.3-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace:
ring-buffer: Stop remote reader update when page swap fails
tracing: Fix retry exhaustion in simple ring buffer reader swap
tracing/user_events: Clear copied tracing state before fork duplication
samples/ftrace: Fix kthread_stop() on ERR_PTR in ftrace-direct-multi-modify
samples/ftrace: Fix kthread_stop() on ERR_PTR in ftrace-direct-modify
eventfs: Initialize ei->children and ei->list in init_ei()
tracing: Fix use-after-free in trace_pipe read on sub-buffer order change
tracing: Fix crash passing ERR_PTR to kthread_stop()
tracing: Fix use-after-free with same-name named triggers
tracing: Fix logged instance name on creation failure
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/spi')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/spi/butterfly.rst | 74 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/spi/index.rst | 16 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/spi/instantiating-devices.rst | 88 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/spi/multiple-data-lanes.rst | 217 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/spi/spi-lm70llp.rst | 84 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/spi/spi-sc18is602.rst | 39 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/spi/spi-summary.rst | 714 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/spi/spidev.rst | 191 |
8 files changed, 1423 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/spi/butterfly.rst b/Documentation/spi/butterfly.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..56088fb09 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/spi/butterfly.rst @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +=================================================== +spi_butterfly - parport-to-butterfly adapter driver +=================================================== + +This is a hardware and software project that includes building and using +a parallel port adapter cable, together with an "AVR Butterfly" to run +firmware for user interfacing and/or sensors. A Butterfly is a $US20 +battery powered card with an AVR microcontroller and lots of goodies: +sensors, LCD, flash, toggle stick, and more. You can use AVR-GCC to +develop firmware for this, and flash it using this adapter cable. + +You can make this adapter from an old printer cable and solder things +directly to the Butterfly. Or (if you have the parts and skills) you +can come up with something fancier, providing circuit protection to the +Butterfly and the printer port, or with a better power supply than two +signal pins from the printer port. Or for that matter, you can use +similar cables to talk to many AVR boards, even a breadboard. + +This is more powerful than "ISP programming" cables since it lets kernel +SPI protocol drivers interact with the AVR, and could even let the AVR +issue interrupts to them. Later, your protocol driver should work +easily with a "real SPI controller", instead of this bitbanger. + + +The first cable connections will hook Linux up to one SPI bus, with the +AVR and a DataFlash chip; and to the AVR reset line. This is all you +need to reflash the firmware, and the pins are the standard Atmel "ISP" +connector pins (used also on non-Butterfly AVR boards). On the parport +side this is like "sp12" programming cables. + + ====== ============= =================== + Signal Butterfly Parport (DB-25) + ====== ============= =================== + SCK J403.PB1/SCK pin 2/D0 + RESET J403.nRST pin 3/D1 + VCC J403.VCC_EXT pin 8/D6 + MOSI J403.PB2/MOSI pin 9/D7 + MISO J403.PB3/MISO pin 11/S7,nBUSY + GND J403.GND pin 23/GND + ====== ============= =================== + +Then to let Linux master that bus to talk to the DataFlash chip, you must +(a) flash new firmware that disables SPI (set PRR.2, and disable pullups +by clearing PORTB.[0-3]); (b) configure the mtd_dataflash driver; and +(c) cable in the chipselect. + + ====== ============ =================== + Signal Butterfly Parport (DB-25) + ====== ============ =================== + VCC J400.VCC_EXT pin 7/D5 + SELECT J400.PB0/nSS pin 17/C3,nSELECT + GND J400.GND pin 24/GND + ====== ============ =================== + +Or you could flash firmware making the AVR into an SPI slave (keeping the +DataFlash in reset) and tweak the spi_butterfly driver to make it bind to +the driver for your custom SPI-based protocol. + +The "USI" controller, using J405, can also be used for a second SPI bus. +That would let you talk to the AVR using custom SPI-with-USI firmware, +while letting either Linux or the AVR use the DataFlash. There are plenty +of spare parport pins to wire this one up, such as: + + ====== ============= =================== + Signal Butterfly Parport (DB-25) + ====== ============= =================== + SCK J403.PE4/USCK pin 5/D3 + MOSI J403.PE5/DI pin 6/D4 + MISO J403.PE6/DO pin 12/S5,nPAPEROUT + GND J403.GND pin 22/GND + + IRQ J402.PF4 pin 10/S6,ACK + GND J402.GND(P2) pin 25/GND + ====== ============= =================== diff --git a/Documentation/spi/index.rst b/Documentation/spi/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3f723e2c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/spi/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +================================= +Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) +================================= + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 1 + + spi-summary + instantiating-devices + spidev + multiple-data-lanes + butterfly + spi-lm70llp + spi-sc18is602 diff --git a/Documentation/spi/instantiating-devices.rst b/Documentation/spi/instantiating-devices.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ec07353b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/spi/instantiating-devices.rst @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +============================== +How to instantiate SPI devices +============================== + +SPI devices are normally declared statically via device-tree, ACPI, or +board files. When the SPI controller is registered, these devices are +instantiated automatically by the SPI core. This is the preferred method +for any device with a proper kernel driver. + +Instantiate from user-space +--------------------------- + +In certain cases a SPI device cannot be declared statically: + +* The ``spidev`` driver, which provides raw userspace access to SPI + buses, explicitly rejects the bare ``"spidev"`` compatible string in + device-tree because spidev is a Linux implementation detail, not a + hardware description. Vendor-specific compatible strings for spidev + (e.g. ``"vendor,board-spidev"``) are also generally not accepted + upstream. Device-tree overlays do not help here either, since the + spidev driver performs the same compatible check regardless of how + the DT node was loaded. + +* You are developing or testing a SPI device on a development board + where the SPI bus is exposed on expansion headers, and the connected + device may change frequently. + +For these cases, a sysfs interface is provided on each SPI host controller +(similar to the I2C ``new_device``/``delete_device`` interface described +in Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices.rst). Two write-only +attribute files are created in every SPI host controller directory: +``new_device`` and ``delete_device``. + +File ``new_device`` takes 2 to 4 parameters: the name of the SPI +device (a string), the chip select number, and optionally +``max_speed_hz`` and ``mode``:: + + <modalias> <chip_select> [<max_speed_hz> [<mode>]] + +The modalias is set both as the device's ``modalias`` field and as its +``driver_override``. This ensures that the device binds to the named +driver directly, bypassing the normal bus matching logic (OF, ACPI, +and ``id_table``). This is necessary because drivers like ``spidev`` +deliberately exclude generic names from their ``id_table``. + +If ``max_speed_hz`` is omitted or 0, ``spi_setup()`` clamps it to +the controller's maximum speed. If ``mode`` is omitted, SPI mode 0 +(CPOL=0, CPHA=0) is used. + +File ``delete_device`` takes a single parameter: the chip select +number. As no two devices can share a chip select on a given SPI bus, +the chip select is sufficient to uniquely identify the device. + +Examples:: + + # Create a spidev device on SPI bus 0, chip select 0 + echo spidev 0 > /sys/class/spi_master/spi0/new_device + + # Create with explicit clock rate and SPI mode + echo spidev 0 10000000 3 > /sys/class/spi_master/spi0/new_device + + # Remove the device + echo 0 > /sys/class/spi_master/spi0/delete_device + +The attributes are added after the host controller and its firmware-described +devices have been registered. Their addition emits a ``change`` uevent, +allowing a udev rule to write to ``new_device`` when the interface is ready. + +Limitations +^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Devices created through this interface have the following limitations +compared to devices declared via device-tree: + +* No interrupt (IRQ) support. +* No additional properties such as ``spi-max-frequency`` DT bindings + or controller-specific configuration. +* No platform data or software nodes. + +For ``spidev`` usage these limitations are not relevant, since spidev +provides a raw byte-level interface that does not require any of these +features. + +Only devices created via ``new_device`` can be removed through +``delete_device``. Devices declared via device-tree, ACPI, or board +files are not affected by this interface. diff --git a/Documentation/spi/multiple-data-lanes.rst b/Documentation/spi/multiple-data-lanes.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..69cb532d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/spi/multiple-data-lanes.rst @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@ +==================================== +SPI devices with multiple data lanes +==================================== + +Some specialized SPI controllers and peripherals support multiple data lanes +that allow reading more than one word at a time in parallel. This is different +from dual/quad/octal SPI where multiple bits of a single word are transferred +simultaneously. + +For example, controllers that support parallel flash memories have this feature +as do some simultaneous-sampling ADCs where each channel has its own data lane. + +--------------------- +Describing the wiring +--------------------- + +The ``spi-tx-bus-width`` and ``spi-rx-bus-width`` properties in the devicetree +are used to describe how many data lanes are connected between the controller +and how wide each lane is. The number of items in the array indicates how many +lanes there are, and the value of each item indicates how many bits wide that +lane is. + +For example, a dual-simultaneous-sampling ADC with two 4-bit lanes might be +wired up like this:: + + +--------------+ +----------+ + | SPI | | AD4630 | + | Controller | | ADC | + | | | | + | CS0 |--->| CS | + | SCK |--->| SCK | + | SDO |--->| SDI | + | | | | + | SDIA0 |<---| SDOA0 | + | SDIA1 |<---| SDOA1 | + | SDIA2 |<---| SDOA2 | + | SDIA3 |<---| SDOA3 | + | | | | + | SDIB0 |<---| SDOB0 | + | SDIB1 |<---| SDOB1 | + | SDIB2 |<---| SDOB2 | + | SDIB3 |<---| SDOB3 | + | | | | + +--------------+ +----------+ + +It is described in a devicetree like this:: + + spi { + compatible = "my,spi-controller"; + + ... + + adc@0 { + compatible = "adi,ad4630"; + reg = <0>; + ... + spi-rx-bus-width = <4>, <4>; /* 2 lanes of 4 bits each */ + ... + }; + }; + +In most cases, lanes will be wired up symmetrically (A to A, B to B, etc). If +this isn't the case, extra ``spi-rx-lane-map`` and ``spi-tx-lane-map`` +properties are needed to provide a mapping between controller lanes and the +physical lane wires. + +Here is an example where a multi-lane SPI controller has each lane wired to +separate single-lane peripherals:: + + +--------------+ +----------+ + | SPI | | Thing 1 | + | Controller | | | + | | | | + | CS0 |--->| CS | + | SDO0 |--->| SDI | + | SDI0 |<---| SDO | + | SCLK0 |--->| SCLK | + | | | | + | | +----------+ + | | + | | +----------+ + | | | Thing 2 | + | | | | + | CS1 |--->| CS | + | SDO1 |--->| SDI | + | SDI1 |<---| SDO | + | SCLK1 |--->| SCLK | + | | | | + +--------------+ +----------+ + +This is described in a devicetree like this:: + + spi { + compatible = "my,spi-controller"; + + ... + + thing1@0 { + compatible = "my,thing1"; + reg = <0>; + ... + }; + + thing2@1 { + compatible = "my,thing2"; + reg = <1>; + ... + spi-tx-lane-map = <1>; /* lane 0 is not used, lane 1 is used for tx wire */ + spi-rx-lane-map = <1>; /* lane 0 is not used, lane 1 is used for rx wire */ + ... + }; + }; + + +The default values of ``spi-rx-bus-width`` and ``spi-tx-bus-width`` are ``<1>``, +so these properties can still be omitted even when ``spi-rx-lane-map`` and +``spi-tx-lane-map`` are used. + +---------------------------- +Usage in a peripheral driver +---------------------------- + +These types of SPI controllers generally do not support arbitrary use of the +multiple lanes. Instead, they operate in one of a few defined modes. Peripheral +drivers should set the :c:type:`struct spi_transfer.multi_lane_mode <spi_transfer>` +field to indicate which mode they want to use for a given transfer. + +The possible values for this field have the following semantics: + +- :c:macro:`SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_SINGLE`: Only use the first lane. Other lanes are + ignored. This means that it is operating just like a conventional SPI + peripheral. This is the default, so it does not need to be explicitly set. + + Example:: + + tx_buf[0] = 0x88; + + struct spi_transfer xfer = { + .tx_buf = tx_buf, + .len = 1, + }; + + spi_sync_transfer(spi, &xfer, 1); + + Assuming the controller is sending the MSB first, the sequence of bits + sent over the tx wire would be (right-most bit is sent first):: + + controller > data bits > peripheral + ---------- ---------------- ---------- + SDO 0 0-0-0-1-0-0-0-1 SDI 0 + +- :c:macro:`SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_MIRROR`: Send a single data word over all of the + lanes at the same time. This only makes sense for writes and not + for reads. + + Example:: + + tx_buf[0] = 0x88; + + struct spi_transfer xfer = { + .tx_buf = tx_buf, + .len = 1, + .multi_lane_mode = SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_MIRROR, + }; + + spi_sync_transfer(spi, &xfer, 1); + + The data is mirrored on each tx wire:: + + controller > data bits > peripheral + ---------- ---------------- ---------- + SDO 0 0-0-0-1-0-0-0-1 SDI 0 + SDO 1 0-0-0-1-0-0-0-1 SDI 1 + +- :c:macro:`SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_STRIPE`: Send or receive two different data words + at the same time, one on each lane. This means that the buffer needs to be + sized to hold data for all lanes. Data is interleaved in the buffer, with + the first word corresponding to lane 0, the second to lane 1, and so on. + Once the last lane is used, the next word in the buffer corresponds to lane + 0 again. Accordingly, the buffer size must be a multiple of the number of + lanes. This mode works for both reads and writes. + + Example:: + + struct spi_transfer xfer = { + .rx_buf = rx_buf, + .len = 2, + .multi_lane_mode = SPI_MULTI_BUS_MODE_STRIPE, + }; + + spi_sync_transfer(spi, &xfer, 1); + + Each rx wire has a different data word sent simultaneously:: + + controller < data bits < peripheral + ---------- ---------------- ---------- + SDI 0 0-0-0-1-0-0-0-1 SDO 0 + SDI 1 1-0-0-0-1-0-0-0 SDO 1 + + After the transfer, ``rx_buf[0] == 0x11`` (word from SDO 0) and + ``rx_buf[1] == 0x88`` (word from SDO 1). + + +----------------------------- +SPI controller driver support +----------------------------- + +To support multiple data lanes, SPI controller drivers need to set +:c:type:`struct spi_controller.num_data_lanes <spi_controller>` to a value +greater than 1. + +Then the part of the driver that handles SPI transfers needs to check the +:c:type:`struct spi_transfer.multi_lane_mode <spi_transfer>` field and implement +the appropriate behavior for each supported mode and return an error for +unsupported modes. + +The core SPI code should handle the rest. diff --git a/Documentation/spi/spi-lm70llp.rst b/Documentation/spi/spi-lm70llp.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ff98ddc76 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/spi/spi-lm70llp.rst @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +============================================== +spi_lm70llp : LM70-LLP parport-to-SPI adapter +============================================== + +Supported board/chip: + + * National Semiconductor LM70 LLP evaluation board + + Datasheet: https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/lm70 + +Author: + Kaiwan N Billimoria <kaiwan@designergraphix.com> + +Description +----------- +This driver provides glue code connecting a National Semiconductor LM70 LLP +temperature sensor evaluation board to the kernel's SPI core subsystem. + +This is a SPI master controller driver. It can be used in conjunction with +(layered under) the LM70 logical driver (a "SPI protocol driver"). +In effect, this driver turns the parallel port interface on the eval board +into a SPI bus with a single device, which will be driven by the generic +LM70 driver (drivers/hwmon/lm70.c). + + +Hardware Interfacing +-------------------- +The schematic for this particular board (the LM70EVAL-LLP) is +available (on page 4) here: + + https://download.datasheets.com/pdfs/documentation/nat/kit&board/lm70llpevalmanual.pdf + +The hardware interfacing on the LM70 LLP eval board is as follows: + + ======== == ========= ========== + Parallel LM70 LLP + Port . Direction JP2 Header + ======== == ========= ========== + D0 2 - - + D1 3 --> V+ 5 + D2 4 --> V+ 5 + D3 5 --> V+ 5 + D4 6 --> V+ 5 + D5 7 --> nCS 8 + D6 8 --> SCLK 3 + D7 9 --> SI/O 5 + GND 25 - GND 7 + Select 13 <-- SI/O 1 + ======== == ========= ========== + +Note that since the LM70 uses a "3-wire" variant of SPI, the SI/SO pin +is connected to both pin D7 (as Master Out) and Select (as Master In) +using an arrangement that lets either the parport or the LM70 pull the +pin low. This can't be shared with true SPI devices, but other 3-wire +devices might share the same SI/SO pin. + +The bitbanger routine in this driver (lm70_txrx) is called back from +the bound "hwmon/lm70" protocol driver through its sysfs hook, using a +spi_write_then_read() call. It performs Mode 0 (SPI/Microwire) bitbanging. +The lm70 driver then interprets the resulting digital temperature value +and exports it through sysfs. + +A "gotcha": National Semiconductor's LM70 LLP eval board circuit schematic +shows that the SI/O line from the LM70 chip is connected to the base of a +transistor Q1 (and also a pullup, and a zener diode to D7); while the +collector is tied to VCC. + +Interpreting this circuit, when the LM70 SI/O line is High (or tristate +and not grounded by the host via D7), the transistor conducts and switches +the collector to zero, which is reflected on pin 13 of the DB25 parport +connector. When SI/O is Low (driven by the LM70 or the host) on the other +hand, the transistor is cut off and the voltage tied to its collector is +reflected on pin 13 as a High level. + +So: the getmiso inline routine in this driver takes this fact into account, +inverting the value read at pin 13. + + +Thanks to +--------- + +- David Brownell for mentoring the SPI-side driver development. +- Dr.Craig Hollabaugh for the (early) "manual" bitbanging driver version. +- Nadir Billimoria for help interpreting the circuit schematic. diff --git a/Documentation/spi/spi-sc18is602.rst b/Documentation/spi/spi-sc18is602.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4ab9ca346 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/spi/spi-sc18is602.rst @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +=========================== +Kernel driver spi-sc18is602 +=========================== + +Supported chips: + + * NXP SI18IS602/602B/603 + + Datasheet: https://www.nxp.com/documents/data_sheet/SC18IS602_602B_603.pdf + +Author: + Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> + + +Description +----------- + +This driver provides connects a NXP SC18IS602/603 I2C-bus to SPI bridge to the +kernel's SPI core subsystem. + +The driver does not probe for supported chips, since the SI18IS602/603 does not +support Chip ID registers. You will have to instantiate the devices explicitly. +Please see Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices.rst for details. + + +Usage Notes +----------- + +This driver requires the I2C adapter driver to support raw I2C messages. I2C +adapter drivers which can only handle the SMBus protocol are not supported. + +The maximum SPI message size supported by SC18IS602/603 is 200 bytes. Attempts +to initiate longer transfers will fail with -EINVAL. EEPROM read operations and +similar large accesses have to be split into multiple chunks of no more than +200 bytes per SPI message (128 bytes of data per message is recommended). This +means that programs such as "cp" or "od", which automatically use large block +sizes to access a device, can not be used directly to read data from EEPROM. +Programs such as dd, where the block size can be specified, should be used +instead. diff --git a/Documentation/spi/spi-summary.rst b/Documentation/spi/spi-summary.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ee34796cf --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/spi/spi-summary.rst @@ -0,0 +1,714 @@ +==================================== +Overview of Linux kernel SPI support +==================================== + +02-Feb-2012 + +What is SPI? +------------ +The "Serial Peripheral Interface" (SPI) is a synchronous four wire serial +link used to connect microcontrollers to sensors, memory, and peripherals. +It's a simple "de facto" standard, not complicated enough to acquire a +standardization body. SPI uses a host/target configuration. + +The three signal wires hold a clock (SCK, often on the order of 10 MHz), +and parallel data lines with "Master Out, Slave In" (MOSI) or "Master In, +Slave Out" (MISO) signals. (Other names are also used.) There are four +clocking modes through which data is exchanged; mode-0 and mode-3 are most +commonly used. Each clock cycle shifts data out and data in; the clock +doesn't cycle except when there is a data bit to shift. Not all data bits +are used though; not every protocol uses those full duplex capabilities. + +SPI hosts use a fourth "chip select" line to activate a given SPI target +device, so those three signal wires may be connected to several chips +in parallel. All SPI targets support chipselects; they are usually active +low signals, labeled nCSx for target 'x' (e.g. nCS0). Some devices have +other signals, often including an interrupt to the host. + +Unlike serial busses like USB or SMBus, even low level protocols for +SPI target functions are usually not interoperable between vendors +(except for commodities like SPI memory chips). + + - SPI may be used for request/response style device protocols, as with + touchscreen sensors and memory chips. + + - It may also be used to stream data in either direction (half duplex), + or both of them at the same time (full duplex). + + - Some devices may use eight bit words. Others may use different word + lengths, such as streams of 12-bit or 20-bit digital samples. + + - Words are usually sent with their most significant bit (MSB) first, + but sometimes the least significant bit (LSB) goes first instead. + + - Sometimes SPI is used to daisy-chain devices, like shift registers. + +In the same way, SPI targets will only rarely support any kind of automatic +discovery/enumeration protocol. The tree of target devices accessible from +a given SPI host controller will normally be set up manually, with +configuration tables. + +SPI is only one of the names used by such four-wire protocols, and +most controllers have no problem handling "MicroWire" (think of it as +half-duplex SPI, for request/response protocols), SSP ("Synchronous +Serial Protocol"), PSP ("Programmable Serial Protocol"), and other +related protocols. + +Some chips eliminate a signal line by combining MOSI and MISO, and +limiting themselves to half-duplex at the hardware level. In fact +some SPI chips have this signal mode as a strapping option. These +can be accessed using the same programming interface as SPI, but of +course they won't handle full duplex transfers. You may find such +chips described as using "three wire" signaling: SCK, data, nCSx. +(That data line is sometimes called MOMI or SISO.) + +Microcontrollers often support both host and target sides of the SPI +protocol. This document (and Linux) supports both the host and target +sides of SPI interactions. + + +Who uses it? On what kinds of systems? +--------------------------------------- +Linux developers using SPI are probably writing device drivers for embedded +systems boards. SPI is used to control external chips, and it is also a +protocol supported by every MMC or SD memory card. (The older "DataFlash" +cards, predating MMC cards but using the same connectors and card shape, +support only SPI.) Some PC hardware uses SPI flash for BIOS code. + +SPI target chips range from digital/analog converters used for analog +sensors and codecs, to memory, to peripherals like USB controllers +or Ethernet adapters; and more. + +Most systems using SPI will integrate a few devices on a mainboard. +Some provide SPI links on expansion connectors; in cases where no +dedicated SPI controller exists, GPIO pins can be used to create a +low speed "bitbanging" adapter. Very few systems will "hotplug" an SPI +controller; the reasons to use SPI focus on low cost and simple operation, +and if dynamic reconfiguration is important, USB will often be a more +appropriate low-pincount peripheral bus. + +Many microcontrollers that can run Linux integrate one or more I/O +interfaces with SPI modes. Given SPI support, they could use MMC or SD +cards without needing a special purpose MMC/SD/SDIO controller. + + +I'm confused. What are these four SPI "clock modes"? +----------------------------------------------------- +It's easy to be confused here, and the vendor documentation you'll +find isn't necessarily helpful. The four modes combine two mode bits: + + - CPOL indicates the initial clock polarity. CPOL=0 means the + clock starts low, so the first (leading) edge is rising, and + the second (trailing) edge is falling. CPOL=1 means the clock + starts high, so the first (leading) edge is falling. + + - CPHA indicates the clock phase used to sample data; CPHA=0 says + sample on the leading edge, CPHA=1 means the trailing edge. + + Since the signal needs to stabilize before it's sampled, CPHA=0 + implies that its data is written half a clock before the first + clock edge. The chipselect may have made it become available. + +Chip specs won't always say "uses SPI mode X" in as many words, +but their timing diagrams will make the CPOL and CPHA modes clear. + +In the SPI mode number, CPOL is the high order bit and CPHA is the +low order bit. So when a chip's timing diagram shows the clock +starting low (CPOL=0) and data stabilized for sampling during the +trailing clock edge (CPHA=1), that's SPI mode 1. + +Note that the clock mode is relevant as soon as the chipselect goes +active. So the host must set the clock to inactive before selecting +a target, and the target can tell the chosen polarity by sampling the +clock level when its select line goes active. That's why many devices +support for example both modes 0 and 3: they don't care about polarity, +and always clock data in/out on rising clock edges. + + +How do these driver programming interfaces work? +------------------------------------------------ +The <linux/spi/spi.h> header file includes kerneldoc, as does the +main source code, and you should certainly read that chapter of the +kernel API document. This is just an overview, so you get the big +picture before those details. + +SPI requests always go into I/O queues. Requests for a given SPI device +are always executed in FIFO order, and complete asynchronously through +completion callbacks. There are also some simple synchronous wrappers +for those calls, including ones for common transaction types like writing +a command and then reading its response. + +There are two types of SPI driver, here called: + + Controller drivers ... + controllers may be built into System-On-Chip + processors, and often support both Controller and target roles. + These drivers touch hardware registers and may use DMA. + Or they can be PIO bitbangers, needing just GPIO pins. + + Protocol drivers ... + these pass messages through the controller + driver to communicate with a target or Controller device on the + other side of an SPI link. + +So for example one protocol driver might talk to the MTD layer to export +data to filesystems stored on SPI flash like DataFlash; and others might +control audio interfaces, present touchscreen sensors as input interfaces, +or monitor temperature and voltage levels during industrial processing. +And those might all be sharing the same controller driver. + +A "struct spi_device" encapsulates the controller-side interface between +those two types of drivers. + +There is a minimal core of SPI programming interfaces, focussing on +using the driver model to connect controller and protocol drivers using +device tables provided by board specific initialization code. SPI +shows up in sysfs in several locations:: + + /sys/devices/.../CTLR ... physical node for a given SPI controller + + /sys/devices/.../CTLR/spiB.C ... spi_device on bus "B", + chipselect C, accessed through CTLR. + + /sys/bus/spi/devices/spiB.C ... symlink to that physical + .../CTLR/spiB.C device + + /sys/devices/.../CTLR/spiB.C/modalias ... identifies the driver + that should be used with this device (for hotplug/coldplug) + + /sys/bus/spi/drivers/D ... driver for one or more spi*.* devices + + /sys/class/spi_master/spiB ... symlink to a logical node which could hold + class related state for the SPI host controller managing bus "B". + All spiB.* devices share one physical SPI bus segment, with SCLK, + MOSI, and MISO. + + /sys/devices/.../CTLR/slave ... virtual file for (un)registering the + target device for an SPI target controller. + Writing the driver name of an SPI target handler to this file + registers the target device; writing "(null)" unregisters the target + device. + Reading from this file shows the name of the target device ("(null)" + if not registered). + + /sys/class/spi_slave/spiB ... symlink to a logical node which could hold + class related state for the SPI target controller on bus "B". When + registered, a single spiB.* device is present here, possible sharing + the physical SPI bus segment with other SPI target devices. + +At this time, the only class-specific state is the bus number ("B" in "spiB"), +so those /sys/class entries are only useful to quickly identify busses. + + +How does board-specific init code declare SPI devices? +------------------------------------------------------ +Linux needs several kinds of information to properly configure SPI devices. +That information is normally provided by board-specific code, even for +chips that do support some of automated discovery/enumeration. + +Declare Controllers +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +The first kind of information is a list of what SPI controllers exist. +For System-on-Chip (SOC) based boards, these will usually be platform +devices, and the controller may need some platform_data in order to +operate properly. The "struct platform_device" will include resources +like the physical address of the controller's first register and its IRQ. + +Platforms will often abstract the "register SPI controller" operation, +maybe coupling it with code to initialize pin configurations, so that +the arch/.../mach-*/board-*.c files for several boards can all share the +same basic controller setup code. This is because most SOCs have several +SPI-capable controllers, and only the ones actually usable on a given +board should normally be set up and registered. + +So for example arch/.../mach-*/board-*.c files might have code like:: + + #include <mach/spi.h> /* for mysoc_spi_data */ + + /* if your mach-* infrastructure doesn't support kernels that can + * run on multiple boards, pdata wouldn't benefit from "__init". + */ + static struct mysoc_spi_data pdata __initdata = { ... }; + + static __init board_init(void) + { + ... + /* this board only uses SPI controller #2 */ + mysoc_register_spi(2, &pdata); + ... + } + +And SOC-specific utility code might look something like:: + + #include <mach/spi.h> + + static struct platform_device spi2 = { ... }; + + void mysoc_register_spi(unsigned n, struct mysoc_spi_data *pdata) + { + struct mysoc_spi_data *pdata2; + + pdata2 = kmalloc_obj(*pdata2); + *pdata2 = pdata; + ... + if (n == 2) { + spi2->dev.platform_data = pdata2; + register_platform_device(&spi2); + + /* also: set up pin modes so the spi2 signals are + * visible on the relevant pins ... bootloaders on + * production boards may already have done this, but + * developer boards will often need Linux to do it. + */ + } + ... + } + +Notice how the platform_data for boards may be different, even if the +same SOC controller is used. For example, on one board SPI might use +an external clock, where another derives the SPI clock from current +settings of some master clock. + +Declare target Devices +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +The second kind of information is a list of what SPI target devices exist +on the target board, often with some board-specific data needed for the +driver to work correctly. + +Normally your arch/.../mach-*/board-*.c files would provide a small table +listing the SPI devices on each board. (This would typically be only a +small handful.) That might look like:: + + static struct ads7846_platform_data ads_info = { + .vref_delay_usecs = 100, + .x_plate_ohms = 580, + .y_plate_ohms = 410, + }; + + static struct spi_board_info spi_board_info[] __initdata = { + { + .modalias = "ads7846", + .platform_data = &ads_info, + .mode = SPI_MODE_0, + .irq = GPIO_IRQ(31), + .max_speed_hz = 120000 /* max sample rate at 3V */ * 16, + .bus_num = 1, + .chip_select = 0, + }, + }; + +Again, notice how board-specific information is provided; each chip may need +several types. This example shows generic constraints like the fastest SPI +clock to allow (a function of board voltage in this case) or how an IRQ pin +is wired, plus chip-specific constraints like an important delay that's +changed by the capacitance at one pin. + +(There's also "controller_data", information that may be useful to the +controller driver. An example would be peripheral-specific DMA tuning +data or chipselect callbacks. This is stored in spi_device later.) + +The board_info should provide enough information to let the system work +without the chip's driver being loaded. The most troublesome aspect of +that is likely the SPI_CS_HIGH bit in the spi_device.mode field, since +sharing a bus with a device that interprets chipselect "backwards" is +not possible until the infrastructure knows how to deselect it. + +Then your board initialization code would register that table with the SPI +infrastructure, so that it's available later when the SPI host controller +driver is registered:: + + spi_register_board_info(spi_board_info, ARRAY_SIZE(spi_board_info)); + +Like with other static board-specific setup, you won't unregister those. + +The widely used "card" style computers bundle memory, cpu, and little else +onto a card that's maybe just thirty square centimeters. On such systems, +your ``arch/.../mach-.../board-*.c`` file would primarily provide information +about the devices on the mainboard into which such a card is plugged. That +certainly includes SPI devices hooked up through the card connectors! + + +Non-static Configurations +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +When Linux includes support for MMC/SD/SDIO/DataFlash cards through SPI, those +configurations will also be dynamic. Fortunately, such devices all support +basic device identification probes, so they should hotplug normally. + + +How do I write an "SPI Protocol Driver"? +---------------------------------------- +Most SPI drivers are currently kernel drivers, but there's also support +for userspace drivers. Here we talk only about kernel drivers. + +SPI protocol drivers somewhat resemble platform device drivers:: + + static struct spi_driver CHIP_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "CHIP", + .pm = &CHIP_pm_ops, + }, + + .probe = CHIP_probe, + .remove = CHIP_remove, + }; + +The driver core will automatically attempt to bind this driver to any SPI +device whose board_info gave a modalias of "CHIP". Your probe() code +might look like this unless you're creating a device which is managing +a bus (appearing under /sys/class/spi_master). + +:: + + static int CHIP_probe(struct spi_device *spi) + { + struct CHIP *chip; + struct CHIP_platform_data *pdata; + + /* assuming the driver requires board-specific data: */ + pdata = &spi->dev.platform_data; + if (!pdata) + return -ENODEV; + + /* get memory for driver's per-chip state */ + chip = kzalloc(*chip); + if (!chip) + return -ENOMEM; + spi_set_drvdata(spi, chip); + + ... etc + return 0; + } + +As soon as it enters probe(), the driver may issue I/O requests to +the SPI device using "struct spi_message". When remove() returns, +or after probe() fails, the driver guarantees that it won't submit +any more such messages. + + - An spi_message is a sequence of protocol operations, executed + as one atomic sequence. SPI driver controls include: + + + when bidirectional reads and writes start ... by how its + sequence of spi_transfer requests is arranged; + + + which I/O buffers are used ... each spi_transfer wraps a + buffer for each transfer direction, supporting full duplex + (two pointers, maybe the same one in both cases) and half + duplex (one pointer is NULL) transfers; + + + optionally defining short delays after transfers ... using + the spi_transfer.delay.value setting (this delay can be the + only protocol effect, if the buffer length is zero) ... + when specifying this delay the default spi_transfer.delay.unit + is microseconds, however this can be adjusted to clock cycles + or nanoseconds if needed; + + + whether the chipselect becomes inactive after a transfer and + any delay ... by using the spi_transfer.cs_change flag; + + + hinting whether the next message is likely to go to this same + device ... using the spi_transfer.cs_change flag on the last + transfer in that atomic group, and potentially saving costs + for chip deselect and select operations. + + - Follow standard kernel rules, and provide DMA-safe buffers in + your messages. That way controller drivers using DMA aren't forced + to make extra copies unless the hardware requires it (e.g. working + around hardware errata that force the use of bounce buffering). + + - The basic I/O primitive is spi_async(). Async requests may be + issued in any context (irq handler, task, etc) and completion + is reported using a callback provided with the message. + After any detected error, the chip is deselected and processing + of that spi_message is aborted. + + - There are also synchronous wrappers like spi_sync(), and wrappers + like spi_read(), spi_write(), and spi_write_then_read(). These + may be issued only in contexts that may sleep, and they're all + clean (and small, and "optional") layers over spi_async(). + + - The spi_write_then_read() call, and convenience wrappers around + it, should only be used with small amounts of data where the + cost of an extra copy may be ignored. It's designed to support + common RPC-style requests, such as writing an eight bit command + and reading a sixteen bit response -- spi_w8r16() being one its + wrappers, doing exactly that. + +Some drivers may need to modify spi_device characteristics like the +transfer mode, wordsize, or clock rate. This is done with spi_setup(), +which would normally be called from probe() before the first I/O is +done to the device. However, that can also be called at any time +that no message is pending for that device. + +While "spi_device" would be the bottom boundary of the driver, the +upper boundaries might include sysfs (especially for sensor readings), +the input layer, ALSA, networking, MTD, the character device framework, +or other Linux subsystems. + +Note that there are two types of memory your driver must manage as part +of interacting with SPI devices. + + - I/O buffers use the usual Linux rules, and must be DMA-safe. + You'd normally allocate them from the heap or free page pool. + Don't use the stack, or anything that's declared "static". + + - The spi_message and spi_transfer metadata used to glue those + I/O buffers into a group of protocol transactions. These can + be allocated anywhere it's convenient, including as part of + other allocate-once driver data structures. Zero-init these. + +If you like, spi_message_alloc() and spi_message_free() convenience +routines are available to allocate and zero-initialize an spi_message +with several transfers. + + +How do I write an "SPI Controller Driver"? +------------------------------------------------- +An SPI controller will probably be registered on the platform_bus; write +a driver to bind to the device, whichever bus is involved. + +The main task of this type of driver is to provide an "spi_controller". +Use spi_alloc_host() to allocate the host controller, and +spi_controller_get_devdata() to get the driver-private data allocated for that +device. + +:: + + struct spi_controller *ctlr; + struct CONTROLLER *c; + + ctlr = spi_alloc_host(dev, sizeof *c); + if (!ctlr) + return -ENODEV; + + c = spi_controller_get_devdata(ctlr); + +The driver will initialize the fields of that spi_controller, including the bus +number (maybe the same as the platform device ID) and three methods used to +interact with the SPI core and SPI protocol drivers. It will also initialize +its own internal state. (See below about bus numbering and those methods.) + +After you initialize the spi_controller, then use spi_register_controller() to +publish it to the rest of the system. At that time, device nodes for the +controller and any predeclared spi devices will be made available, and +the driver model core will take care of binding them to drivers. + +If you need to remove your SPI controller driver, spi_unregister_controller() +will reverse the effect of spi_register_controller(). + + +Bus Numbering +^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Bus numbering is important, since that's how Linux identifies a given +SPI bus (shared SCK, MOSI, MISO). Valid bus numbers start at zero. On +SOC systems, the bus numbers should match the numbers defined by the chip +manufacturer. For example, hardware controller SPI2 would be bus number 2, +and spi_board_info for devices connected to it would use that number. + +If you don't have such hardware-assigned bus number, and for some reason +you can't just assign them, then provide a negative bus number. That will +then be replaced by a dynamically assigned number. You'd then need to treat +this as a non-static configuration (see above). + + +SPI Host Controller Methods +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +``ctlr->setup(struct spi_device *spi)`` + This sets up the device clock rate, SPI mode, and word sizes. + Drivers may change the defaults provided by board_info, and then + call spi_setup(spi) to invoke this routine. It may sleep. + + Unless each SPI target has its own configuration registers, don't + change them right away ... otherwise drivers could corrupt I/O + that's in progress for other SPI devices. + + .. note:: + + BUG ALERT: for some reason the first version of + many spi_controller drivers seems to get this wrong. + When you code setup(), ASSUME that the controller + is actively processing transfers for another device. + +``ctlr->cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)`` + Your controller driver may use spi_device.controller_state to hold + state it dynamically associates with that device. If you do that, + be sure to provide the cleanup() method to free that state. + +``ctlr->prepare_transfer_hardware(struct spi_controller *ctlr)`` + This will be called by the queue mechanism to signal to the driver + that a message is coming in soon, so the subsystem requests the + driver to prepare the transfer hardware by issuing this call. + This may sleep. + +``ctlr->unprepare_transfer_hardware(struct spi_controller *ctlr)`` + This will be called by the queue mechanism to signal to the driver + that there are no more messages pending in the queue and it may + relax the hardware (e.g. by power management calls). This may sleep. + +``ctlr->transfer_one_message(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_message *mesg)`` + The subsystem calls the driver to transfer a single message while + queuing transfers that arrive in the meantime. When the driver is + finished with this message, it must call + spi_finalize_current_message() so the subsystem can issue the next + message. This may sleep. + +``ctrl->transfer_one(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_transfer *transfer)`` + The subsystem calls the driver to transfer a single transfer while + queuing transfers that arrive in the meantime. When the driver is + finished with this transfer, it must call + spi_finalize_current_transfer() so the subsystem can issue the next + transfer. This may sleep. Note: transfer_one and transfer_one_message + are mutually exclusive; when both are set, the generic subsystem does + not call your transfer_one callback. + + Return values: + + * negative errno: error + * 0: transfer is finished + * 1: transfer is still in progress + +``ctrl->set_cs_timing(struct spi_device *spi, u8 setup_clk_cycles, u8 hold_clk_cycles, u8 inactive_clk_cycles)`` + This method allows SPI client drivers to request SPI host controller + for configuring device specific CS setup, hold and inactive timing + requirements. + +Deprecated Methods +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +``ctrl->transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message)`` + This must not sleep. Its responsibility is to arrange that the + transfer happens and its complete() callback is issued. The two + will normally happen later, after other transfers complete, and + if the controller is idle it will need to be kickstarted. This + method is not used on queued controllers and must be NULL if + transfer_one_message() and (un)prepare_transfer_hardware() are + implemented. + + +SPI Message Queue +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +If you are happy with the standard queueing mechanism provided by the +SPI subsystem, just implement the queued methods specified above. Using +the message queue has the upside of centralizing a lot of code and +providing pure process-context execution of methods. The message queue +can also be elevated to realtime priority on high-priority SPI traffic. + +Unless the queueing mechanism in the SPI subsystem is selected, the bulk +of the driver will be managing the I/O queue fed by the now deprecated +function transfer(). + +That queue could be purely conceptual. For example, a driver used only +for low-frequency sensor access might be fine using synchronous PIO. + +But the queue will probably be very real, using message->queue, PIO, +often DMA (especially if the root filesystem is in SPI flash), and +execution contexts like IRQ handlers, tasklets, or workqueues (such +as keventd). Your driver can be as fancy, or as simple, as you need. +Such a transfer() method would normally just add the message to a +queue, and then start some asynchronous transfer engine (unless it's +already running). + + +Extensions to the SPI protocol +------------------------------ +The fact that SPI doesn't have a formal specification or standard permits chip +manufacturers to implement the SPI protocol in slightly different ways. In most +cases, SPI protocol implementations from different vendors are compatible among +each other. For example, in SPI mode 0 (CPOL=0, CPHA=0) the bus lines may behave +like the following: + +:: + + nCSx ___ ___ + \_________________________________________________________________/ + • • + • • + SCLK ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ + _______/ \___/ \___/ \___/ \___/ \___/ \___/ \___/ \_____ + • : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; • + • : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; • + MOSI XXX__________ _______ _______ ________XXX + 0xA5 XXX__/ 1 \_0_____/ 1 \_0_______0_____/ 1 \_0_____/ 1 \_XXX + • ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; • + • ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; • + MISO XXX__________ _______________________ _______ XXX + 0xBA XXX__/ 1 \_____0_/ 1 1 1 \_____0__/ 1 \____0__XXX + +Legend:: + + • marks the start/end of transmission; + : marks when data is clocked into the peripheral; + ; marks when data is clocked into the controller; + X marks when line states are not specified. + +In some few cases, chips extend the SPI protocol by specifying line behaviors +that other SPI protocols don't (e.g. data line state for when CS is not +asserted). Those distinct SPI protocols, modes, and configurations are supported +by different SPI mode flags. + +MOSI idle state configuration +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Common SPI protocol implementations don't specify any state or behavior for the +MOSI line when the controller is not clocking out data. However, there do exist +peripherals that require specific MOSI line state when data is not being clocked +out. For example, if the peripheral expects the MOSI line to be high when the +controller is not clocking out data (``SPI_MOSI_IDLE_HIGH``), then a transfer in +SPI mode 0 would look like the following: + +:: + + nCSx ___ ___ + \_________________________________________________________________/ + • • + • • + SCLK ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ + _______/ \___/ \___/ \___/ \___/ \___/ \___/ \___/ \_____ + • : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; • + • : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; : ; • + MOSI _____ _______ _______ _______________ ___ + 0x56 \_0_____/ 1 \_0_____/ 1 \_0_____/ 1 1 \_0_____/ + • ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; • + • ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; • + MISO XXX__________ _______________________ _______ XXX + 0xBA XXX__/ 1 \_____0_/ 1 1 1 \_____0__/ 1 \____0__XXX + +Legend:: + + • marks the start/end of transmission; + : marks when data is clocked into the peripheral; + ; marks when data is clocked into the controller; + X marks when line states are not specified. + +In this extension to the usual SPI protocol, the MOSI line state is specified to +be kept high when CS is asserted but the controller is not clocking out data to +the peripheral and also when CS is not asserted. + +Peripherals that require this extension must request it by setting the +``SPI_MOSI_IDLE_HIGH`` bit into the mode attribute of their ``struct +spi_device`` and call spi_setup(). Controllers that support this extension +should indicate it by setting ``SPI_MOSI_IDLE_HIGH`` in the mode_bits attribute +of their ``struct spi_controller``. The configuration to idle MOSI low is +analogous but uses the ``SPI_MOSI_IDLE_LOW`` mode bit. + + +THANKS TO +--------- +Contributors to Linux-SPI discussions include (in alphabetical order, +by last name): + +- Mark Brown +- David Brownell +- Russell King +- Grant Likely +- Dmitry Pervushin +- Stephen Street +- Mark Underwood +- Andrew Victor +- Linus Walleij +- Vitaly Wool diff --git a/Documentation/spi/spidev.rst b/Documentation/spi/spidev.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e08b301ad --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/spi/spidev.rst @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@ +================= +SPI userspace API +================= + +SPI devices have a limited userspace API, supporting basic half-duplex +read() and write() access to SPI slave devices. Using ioctl() requests, +full duplex transfers and device I/O configuration are also available. + +:: + + #include <fcntl.h> + #include <unistd.h> + #include <sys/ioctl.h> + #include <linux/types.h> + #include <linux/spi/spidev.h> + +Some reasons you might want to use this programming interface include: + + * Prototyping in an environment that's not crash-prone; stray pointers + in userspace won't normally bring down any Linux system. + + * Developing simple protocols used to talk to microcontrollers acting + as SPI slaves, which you may need to change quite often. + +Of course there are drivers that can never be written in userspace, because +they need to access kernel interfaces (such as IRQ handlers or other layers +of the driver stack) that are not accessible to userspace. + + +DEVICE CREATION, DRIVER BINDING +=============================== + +The spidev driver contains lists of SPI devices that are supported for +the different hardware topology representations. + +The following are the SPI device tables supported by the spidev driver: + + - struct spi_device_id spidev_spi_ids[]: list of devices that can be + bound when these are defined using a struct spi_board_info with a + .modalias field matching one of the entries in the table. + + - struct of_device_id spidev_dt_ids[]: list of devices that can be + bound when these are defined using a Device Tree node that has a + compatible string matching one of the entries in the table. + + - struct acpi_device_id spidev_acpi_ids[]: list of devices that can + be bound when these are defined using a ACPI device object with a + _HID matching one of the entries in the table. + +You are encouraged to add an entry for your SPI device name to relevant +tables, if these don't already have an entry for the device. To do that, +post a patch for spidev to the linux-spi@vger.kernel.org mailing list. + +It used to be supported to define an SPI device using the "spidev" name. +For example, as .modalias = "spidev" or compatible = "spidev". But this +is no longer supported by the Linux kernel and instead a real SPI device +name as listed in one of the tables must be used. + +Not having a real SPI device name will lead to an error being printed and +the spidev driver failing to probe. + +Sysfs also supports userspace driven binding/unbinding of drivers to +devices that do not bind automatically using one of the tables above. +To make the spidev driver bind to such a device, use the following:: + + echo spidev > /sys/bus/spi/devices/spiB.C/driver_override + echo spiB.C > /sys/bus/spi/drivers/spidev/bind + +When the spidev driver is bound to a SPI device, the sysfs node for the +device will include a child device node with a "dev" attribute that will +be understood by udev or mdev (udev replacement from BusyBox; it's less +featureful, but often enough). + +For a SPI device with chipselect C on bus B, you should see: + + /dev/spidevB.C ... + character special device, major number 153 with + a dynamically chosen minor device number. This is the node + that userspace programs will open, created by "udev" or "mdev". + + /sys/devices/.../spiB.C ... + as usual, the SPI device node will + be a child of its SPI master controller. + + /sys/class/spidev/spidevB.C ... + created when the "spidev" driver + binds to that device. (Directory or symlink, based on whether + or not you enabled the "deprecated sysfs files" Kconfig option.) + +Do not try to manage the /dev character device special file nodes by hand. +That's error prone, and you'd need to pay careful attention to system +security issues; udev/mdev should already be configured securely. + +If you unbind the "spidev" driver from that device, those two "spidev" nodes +(in sysfs and in /dev) should automatically be removed (respectively by the +kernel and by udev/mdev). You can unbind by removing the "spidev" driver +module, which will affect all devices using this driver. You can also unbind +by having kernel code remove the SPI device, probably by removing the driver +for its SPI controller (so its spi_master vanishes). + +Since this is a standard Linux device driver -- even though it just happens +to expose a low level API to userspace -- it can be associated with any number +of devices at a time. Just provide one spi_board_info record for each such +SPI device, and you'll get a /dev device node for each device. + + +BASIC CHARACTER DEVICE API +========================== +Normal open() and close() operations on /dev/spidevB.D files work as you +would expect. + +Standard read() and write() operations are obviously only half-duplex, and +the chipselect is deactivated between those operations. Full-duplex access, +and composite operation without chipselect de-activation, is available using +the SPI_IOC_MESSAGE(N) request. + +Several ioctl() requests let your driver read or override the device's current +settings for data transfer parameters: + + SPI_IOC_RD_MODE, SPI_IOC_WR_MODE ... + pass a pointer to a byte which will + return (RD) or assign (WR) the SPI transfer mode. Use the constants + SPI_MODE_0..SPI_MODE_3; or if you prefer you can combine SPI_CPOL + (clock polarity, idle high iff this is set) or SPI_CPHA (clock phase, + sample on trailing edge iff this is set) flags. + Note that this request is limited to SPI mode flags that fit in a + single byte. + + SPI_IOC_RD_MODE32, SPI_IOC_WR_MODE32 ... + pass a pointer to a uin32_t + which will return (RD) or assign (WR) the full SPI transfer mode, + not limited to the bits that fit in one byte. + + SPI_IOC_RD_LSB_FIRST, SPI_IOC_WR_LSB_FIRST ... + pass a pointer to a byte + which will return (RD) or assign (WR) the bit justification used to + transfer SPI words. Zero indicates MSB-first; other values indicate + the less common LSB-first encoding. In both cases the specified value + is right-justified in each word, so that unused (TX) or undefined (RX) + bits are in the MSBs. + + SPI_IOC_RD_BITS_PER_WORD, SPI_IOC_WR_BITS_PER_WORD ... + pass a pointer to + a byte which will return (RD) or assign (WR) the number of bits in + each SPI transfer word. The value zero signifies eight bits. + + SPI_IOC_RD_MAX_SPEED_HZ, SPI_IOC_WR_MAX_SPEED_HZ ... + pass a pointer to a + u32 which will return (RD) or assign (WR) the maximum SPI transfer + speed, in Hz. The controller can't necessarily assign that specific + clock speed. + +NOTES: + + - At this time there is no async I/O support; everything is purely + synchronous. + + - There's currently no way to report the actual bit rate used to + shift data to/from a given device. + + - From userspace, you can't currently change the chip select polarity; + that could corrupt transfers to other devices sharing the SPI bus. + Each SPI device is deselected when it's not in active use, allowing + other drivers to talk to other devices. + + - There's a limit on the number of bytes each I/O request can transfer + to the SPI device. It defaults to one page, but that can be changed + using a module parameter. + + - Because SPI has no low-level transfer acknowledgement, you usually + won't see any I/O errors when talking to a non-existent device. + + +FULL DUPLEX CHARACTER DEVICE API +================================ + +See the spidev_fdx.c sample program for one example showing the use of the +full duplex programming interface. (Although it doesn't perform a full duplex +transfer.) The model is the same as that used in the kernel spi_sync() +request; the individual transfers offer the same capabilities as are +available to kernel drivers (except that it's not asynchronous). + +The example shows one half-duplex RPC-style request and response message. +These requests commonly require that the chip not be deselected between +the request and response. Several such requests could be chained into +a single kernel request, even allowing the chip to be deselected after +each response. (Other protocol options include changing the word size +and bitrate for each transfer segment.) + +To make a full duplex request, provide both rx_buf and tx_buf for the +same transfer. It's even OK if those are the same buffer. |
