Merge tag 'pinctrl-v7.3-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrlgrafted

Pull pin control updates from Linus Walleij:
 "Core changes:

   - Use the non-blocking mux_state_try_select() in the generic MUX pin
     control back-end

   - Free pin maps on pinctrl_generic_to_map() failure in the core
     helpers

  New hardware pin control:

   - Qualcomm Maili TLMM SoC, PMG1110 PMIC, and Eliza LPASS LPI TLMM SoC
     (this is for the low power audio, LPASS = Low Power Audio SubSystem
     portions)

   - Upboard support on top of the Intel pin controller

   - Apple T6030 and T6031 support (just compatible strings)

   - Samsung Exynos 8855 SoC

   - Mediatek MT6858 SoC

   - Rockchip RK3308B and RV1106 SoCs

   - Airoha EN7523 and AN7563 SoCs

  Improvements:

   - Qualcomm TLMM GPIOs are unconditionally marked as wakeup capable

   - Qualcomm improvements on top of the Qualcomm PDC (power domain
     controller) irqchip improvements from tglx:s tree

   - Qualcomm IPQ806x and IPQ9650 non-urgent pin grop fixups

   - The NPCM8xx driver has been put into shape fixing many pin and
     group definitions

   - Some non-urgent Tegra 264 pin assignments are fixed up

   - Some non-urgent fixups to Airoha AN7581 and AN7583 registers and
     pin assignments, missing features etc"

* tag 'pinctrl-v7.3-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl: (130 commits)
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: Convert TI DA850 pupd to DT schema
  pinctrl: meson: sync some modify from A4
  pinctrl: meson: a4: Add input enable pin configuration
  pinctrl: realtek: rtd1625: remove unused group name spdif_sel
  pinctrl: realtek: rtd1625: fix base_bit for VE4 GPIO 13
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: microchip,pic32mzda-pinctrl: Convert to DT schema
  Revert "Merge branch 'ib-rsk7204' into devel"
  pinctrl: rockchip: Add RV1106 pinctrl support
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: rockchip: Add RV1106 compatible
  pinctrl: rockchip: Decode drive strength in the get function
  pinctrl: fix PINCTRL_GENERIC_MUX not always being selectable
  pinctrl: airoha: add support of an7563 SoC
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: airoha: add support of an7563 pin controller
  pinctrl: airoha: try to find chip scu node by phandle first
  pinctrl: airoha: add support of en7523 SoC
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: airoha: add support of en7523 pin controller
  pinctrl: airoha: an7583: add support for olt pinmux
  pinctrl: airoha: an7583: add support for pon_alt pinmux
  pinctrl: airoha: an7583: add support for npu_uart pinmux
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: airoha: an7583: add missed features
  ...

1 files changed, 161 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/rust/general-information.rst b/Documentation/rust/general-information.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..09234bed2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/rust/general-information.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+General Information
+===================
+
+This document contains useful information to know when working with
+the Rust support in the kernel.
+
+
+``no_std``
+----------
+
+The Rust support in the kernel can link only `core <https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/>`_,
+but not `std <https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/>`_. Crates for use in the
+kernel must opt into this behavior using the ``#![no_std]`` attribute.
+
+
+.. _rust_code_documentation:
+
+Code documentation
+------------------
+
+Rust kernel code is documented using ``rustdoc``, its built-in documentation
+generator.
+
+The generated HTML docs include integrated search, linked items (e.g. types,
+functions, constants), source code, etc. They may be read at:
+
+	https://rust.docs.kernel.org
+
+For linux-next, please see:
+
+	https://rust.docs.kernel.org/next/
+
+There are also tags for each main release, e.g.:
+
+	https://rust.docs.kernel.org/6.10/
+
+The docs can also be easily generated and read locally. This is quite fast
+(same order as compiling the code itself) and no special tools or environment
+are needed. This has the added advantage that they will be tailored to
+the particular kernel configuration used. To generate them, use the ``rustdoc``
+target with the same invocation used for compilation, e.g.::
+
+	make LLVM=1 rustdoc
+
+To read the docs locally in your web browser, run e.g.::
+
+	xdg-open Documentation/output/rust/rustdoc/kernel/index.html
+
+To learn about how to write the documentation, please see coding-guidelines.rst.
+
+
+Extra lints
+-----------
+
+While ``rustc`` is a very helpful compiler, some extra lints and analyses are
+available via ``clippy``, a Rust linter. To enable it, pass ``CLIPPY=1`` to
+the same invocation used for compilation, e.g.::
+
+	make LLVM=1 CLIPPY=1
+
+Please note that Clippy may change code generation, thus it should not be
+enabled while building a production kernel.
+
+
+Abstractions vs. bindings
+-------------------------
+
+Abstractions are Rust code wrapping kernel functionality from the C side.
+
+In order to use functions and types from the C side, bindings are created.
+Bindings are the declarations for Rust of those functions and types from
+the C side.
+
+For instance, one may write a ``Mutex`` abstraction in Rust which wraps
+a ``struct mutex`` from the C side and calls its functions through the bindings.
+
+Abstractions are not available for all the kernel internal APIs and concepts,
+but it is intended that coverage is expanded as time goes on. "Leaf" modules
+(e.g. drivers) should not use the C bindings directly. Instead, subsystems
+should provide as-safe-as-possible abstractions as needed.
+
+.. code-block::
+
+	                                                rust/bindings/
+	                                               (rust/helpers/)
+
+	                                                   include/ -----+ <-+
+	                                                                 |   |
+	  drivers/              rust/kernel/              +----------+ <-+   |
+	    fs/                                           | bindgen  |       |
+	   .../            +-------------------+          +----------+ --+   |
+	                   |    Abstractions   |                         |   |
+	+---------+        | +------+ +------+ |          +----------+   |   |
+	| my_foo  | -----> | | foo  | | bar  | | -------> | Bindings | <-+   |
+	| driver  |  Safe  | | sub- | | sub- | |  Unsafe  |          |       |
+	+---------+        | |system| |system| |          | bindings | <-----+
+	     |             | +------+ +------+ |          |  crate   |       |
+	     |             |   kernel crate    |          +----------+       |
+	     |             +-------------------+                             |
+	     |                                                               |
+	     +------------------# FORBIDDEN #--------------------------------+
+
+The main idea is to encapsulate all direct interaction with the kernel's C APIs
+into carefully reviewed and documented abstractions. Then users of these
+abstractions cannot introduce undefined behavior (UB) as long as:
+
+#. The abstractions are correct ("sound").
+#. Any ``unsafe`` blocks respect the safety contract necessary to call the
+   operations inside the block. Similarly, any ``unsafe impl``\ s respect the
+   safety contract necessary to implement the trait.
+
+Bindings
+~~~~~~~~
+
+By including a C header from ``include/`` into
+``rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h``, the ``bindgen`` tool will auto-generate the
+bindings for the included subsystem. After building, see the ``*_generated.rs``
+output files in the ``rust/bindings/`` directory.
+
+For parts of the C header that ``bindgen`` does not auto generate, e.g. C
+``inline`` functions or non-trivial macros, it is acceptable to add a small
+wrapper function to ``rust/helpers/`` to make it available for the Rust side as
+well.
+
+Abstractions
+~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Abstractions are the layer between the bindings and the in-kernel users. They
+are located in ``rust/kernel/`` and their role is to encapsulate the unsafe
+access to the bindings into an as-safe-as-possible API that they expose to their
+users. Users of the abstractions include things like drivers or file systems
+written in Rust.
+
+Besides the safety aspect, the abstractions are supposed to be "ergonomic", in
+the sense that they turn the C interfaces into "idiomatic" Rust code. Basic
+examples are to turn the C resource acquisition and release into Rust
+constructors and destructors or C integer error codes into Rust's ``Result``\ s.
+
+
+Conditional compilation
+-----------------------
+
+Rust code has access to conditional compilation based on the kernel
+configuration:
+
+.. code-block:: rust
+
+	#[cfg(CONFIG_X)]       // Enabled               (`y` or `m`)
+	#[cfg(CONFIG_X="y")]   // Enabled as a built-in (`y`)
+	#[cfg(CONFIG_X="m")]   // Enabled as a module   (`m`)
+	#[cfg(not(CONFIG_X))]  // Disabled
+
+For other predicates that Rust's ``cfg`` does not support, e.g. expressions with
+numerical comparisons, one may define a new Kconfig symbol:
+
+.. code-block:: kconfig
+
+	config RUSTC_HAS_SPAN_FILE
+		def_bool RUSTC_VERSION >= 108800