diff options
| author | Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> | 2026-08-16 15:32:33 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> | 2026-08-23 21:27:17 +0200 |
| commit | 5febf432df1cfa5b25d99b54c32103fafbdd0eb9 (patch) | |
| tree | 93a1ed1d337bc53adf1e572c2586d347703b286e /Documentation/process/debugging/index.rst | |
| download | linux-stable-5febf432df1cfa5b25d99b54c32103fafbdd0eb9.tar.gz linux-stable-5febf432df1cfa5b25d99b54c32103fafbdd0eb9.zip | |
kbuild: rust: keep Rust objects out of Clang LTO with inline helpersgrafted
Under `CONFIG_LTO_CLANG` + `CONFIG_RUST_INLINE_HELPERS`, one may hit
`objtool` errors such as:
vmlinux.o: error: objtool: _R..._3Gsp4boot+0xd6a:
can't find jump dest instruction at .text._R..._3Gsp4boot+0x1dfd
The reason is that in such builds, the Clang invocation that compiles
the combined Rust plus helpers bitcode emits LLVM bitcode (again) --
the final code generation happens in the linker's LTO step, which the
`-mllvm` trap options passed to Clang do not reach.
This, in turn, means that unreachable traps are missing, and the
impossible paths do not merely fallthrough to the next symbol, but past
the end of their own section, since LTO builds place each function in
its own section.
Thus filter `CC_FLAGS_LTO` out of the Clang invocation, so that it always
emits machine code directly, with the traps in place.
Assisted-by: LLM
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@google.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3a2486cc1da5 ("kbuild: rust: provide an option to inline C helpers into Rust")
Acked-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260816133233.197500-2-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/process/debugging/index.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/process/debugging/index.rst | 71 |
1 files changed, 71 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/debugging/index.rst b/Documentation/process/debugging/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..357243e18 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/process/debugging/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +============================================ +Debugging advice for Linux Kernel developers +============================================ + +general guides +-------------- + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 1 + + driver_development_debugging_guide + gdb-kernel-debugging + kgdb + userspace_debugging_guide + +subsystem specific guides +------------------------- + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 1 + + media_specific_debugging_guide + +General debugging advice +======================== + +Depending on the issue, a different set of tools is available to track down the +problem or even to realize whether there is one in the first place. + +As a first step you have to figure out what kind of issue you want to debug. +Depending on the answer, your methodology and choice of tools may vary. + +Do I need to debug with limited access? +--------------------------------------- + +Do you have limited access to the machine or are you unable to stop the running +execution? + +In this case your debugging capability depends on built-in debugging support of +provided distribution kernel. +The :doc:`/process/debugging/userspace_debugging_guide` provides a brief +overview over a range of possible debugging tools in that situation. You can +check the capability of your kernel, in most cases, by looking into config file +within the /boot directory. + +Do I have root access to the system? +------------------------------------ + +Are you easily able to replace the module in question or to install a new +kernel? + +In that case your range of available tools is a lot bigger, you can find the +tools in the :doc:`/process/debugging/driver_development_debugging_guide`. + +Is timing a factor? +------------------- + +It is important to understand if the problem you want to debug manifests itself +consistently (i.e. given a set of inputs you always get the same, incorrect +output), or inconsistently. If it manifests itself inconsistently, some timing +factor might be at play. If inserting delays into the code does change the +behavior, then quite likely timing is a factor. + +When timing does alter the outcome of the code execution using a simple +printk() for debugging purposes may not work, a similar alternative is to use +trace_printk() , which logs the debug messages to the trace file instead of the +kernel log. + +**Copyright** ©2024 : Collabora |
