diff options
| author | Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> | 2026-09-09 11:29:53 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> | 2026-09-10 08:43:35 +0900 |
| commit | d22c3e0088e85be8131f7a9283f759cdbb20726d (patch) | |
| tree | 9668df2aa27b26f850d3ba5ba1287e443803675c /Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | |
| download | linux-stable-d22c3e0088e85be8131f7a9283f759cdbb20726d.tar.gz linux-stable-d22c3e0088e85be8131f7a9283f759cdbb20726d.zip | |
selftests/ftrace: Fix unique symbol check in kprobe_non_uniq_symbol.tcgrafted
The current regex also matches symbols in modules, which makes the
test fail on s390 where name_show is present only once in the kernel,
but also multiple times in modules:
000001b1401cdc20 t name_show
000001b0c05e6c40 t name_show [mdev]
000001b0c0495f30 t name_show [i2c_core]
Fix this by changing the regular expression to only match the function
name.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260909092954.2200558-1-svens@linux.ibm.com/
Fixes: 03b80ff8023a ("selftests/ftrace: Add new test case which checks non unique symbol")
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 86 |
1 files changed, 86 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..be50294ae --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +.. _code_of_conduct: + +Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + +Our Pledge +========== + +In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as +contributors and maintainers pledge to making participation in our project and +our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body +size, disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and +expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality, +personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. + +Our Standards +============= + +Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment +include: + +* Using welcoming and inclusive language +* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences +* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism +* Focusing on what is best for the community +* Showing empathy towards other community members + + +Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include: + +* The use of sexualized language or imagery and unwelcome sexual attention or + advances +* Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks +* Public or private harassment +* Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic + address, without explicit permission +* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a + professional setting + + +Our Responsibilities +==================== + +Maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable behavior +and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to +any instances of unacceptable behavior. + +Maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject +comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are +not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any +contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, threatening, +offensive, or harmful. + +Scope +===== + +This Code of Conduct applies both within project spaces and in public spaces +when an individual is representing the project or its community. Examples of +representing a project or community include using an official project e-mail +address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed +representative at an online or offline event. Representation of a project may be +further defined and clarified by project maintainers. + +Enforcement +=========== + +Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be +reported by contacting the Code of Conduct Committee at +<conduct@kernel.org>. All complaints will be reviewed and investigated +and will result in a response that is deemed necessary and appropriate +to the circumstances. The Code of Conduct Committee is obligated to +maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident. +Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted +separately. + +Attribution +=========== + +This Code of Conduct is adapted from the Contributor Covenant, version 1.4, +available at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html + +Interpretation +============== + +See the :ref:`code_of_conduct_interpretation` document for how the Linux +kernel community will be interpreting this document. |
