drm/amd/display: Try RGB before YCbCr 4:4:4 in stream validationgrafted

amdgpu_dm_create_validate_stream_for_sink() walks encoding_order[] and
uses the first encoding that validates. YCbCr 4:4:4 is listed before
RGB, so an HDMI sink that advertises 4:4:4 gets YCbCr 4:4:4 whenever the
"color format" property is left at AUTO, even though RGB fits the same
link.

That contradicts the documented AUTO behaviour for HDMI in enum
drm_connector_color_format (RGB, falling back to YCbCr 4:2:0 only when
the bandwidth is not available or the mode is 4:2:0-only), which the
amdgpu implementation of the property also describes. It also leaves
the "Broadcast RGB" property without effect on such sinks, since the
quantization range it selects only applies to RGB output.

Try RGB first. The mask still holds every encoding the sink supports,
so a mode that cannot carry RGB falls back exactly as before.

For reference, v7.2 picked RGB here unless YCbCr 4:4:4 was forced
through debugfs, while earlier kernels picked YCbCr 4:4:4 for any HDMI
sink that advertised it.

Fixes: 0b0ff65d3ca1 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor stream validation")
Suggested-by: Adolfo Rodrigues <adolfotregosa@gmail.com>
Assisted-by: Claude Code:claude-fable-5-1
Signed-off-by: Adrian Betschart <adrian.betschart@cinemaone.ch>
Reviewed-by: Fangzhi Zuo <jerry.zuo@amd.com>
Tested-by: Adolfo Rodrigues <adolfotregosa@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7de432bc753133764dc40d37f9388da56de251e7)

1 files changed, 46 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ipsec.rst b/Documentation/networking/ipsec.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..afe9d7b48
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/networking/ipsec.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+=====
+IPsec
+=====
+
+
+Here documents known IPsec corner cases which need to be keep in mind when
+deploy various IPsec configuration in real world production environment.
+
+1. IPcomp:
+	   Small IP packet won't get compressed at sender, and failed on
+	   policy check on receiver.
+
+Quote from RFC3173::
+
+  2.2. Non-Expansion Policy
+
+   If the total size of a compressed payload and the IPComp header, as
+   defined in section 3, is not smaller than the size of the original
+   payload, the IP datagram MUST be sent in the original non-compressed
+   form.  To clarify: If an IP datagram is sent non-compressed, no
+
+   IPComp header is added to the datagram.  This policy ensures saving
+   the decompression processing cycles and avoiding incurring IP
+   datagram fragmentation when the expanded datagram is larger than the
+   MTU.
+
+   Small IP datagrams are likely to expand as a result of compression.
+   Therefore, a numeric threshold should be applied before compression,
+   where IP datagrams of size smaller than the threshold are sent in the
+   original form without attempting compression.  The numeric threshold
+   is implementation dependent.
+
+Current IPComp implementation is indeed by the book, while as in practice
+when sending non-compressed packet to the peer (whether or not packet len
+is smaller than the threshold or the compressed len is larger than original
+packet len), the packet is dropped when checking the policy as this packet
+matches the selector but not coming from any XFRM layer, i.e., with no
+security path. Such naked packet will not eventually make it to upper layer.
+The result is much more wired to the user when ping peer with different
+payload length.
+
+One workaround is try to set "level use" for each policy if user observed
+above scenario. The consequence of doing so is small packet(uncompressed)
+will skip policy checking on receiver side.