diff options
| author | Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> | 2026-09-09 11:29:53 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> | 2026-09-10 08:43:35 +0900 |
| commit | d22c3e0088e85be8131f7a9283f759cdbb20726d (patch) | |
| tree | 9668df2aa27b26f850d3ba5ba1287e443803675c /Documentation/netlabel/lsm_interface.rst | |
| download | linux-stable-d22c3e0088e85be8131f7a9283f759cdbb20726d.tar.gz linux-stable-d22c3e0088e85be8131f7a9283f759cdbb20726d.zip | |
selftests/ftrace: Fix unique symbol check in kprobe_non_uniq_symbol.tcgrafted
The current regex also matches symbols in modules, which makes the
test fail on s390 where name_show is present only once in the kernel,
but also multiple times in modules:
000001b1401cdc20 t name_show
000001b0c05e6c40 t name_show [mdev]
000001b0c0495f30 t name_show [i2c_core]
Fix this by changing the regular expression to only match the function
name.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260909092954.2200558-1-svens@linux.ibm.com/
Fixes: 03b80ff8023a ("selftests/ftrace: Add new test case which checks non unique symbol")
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/netlabel/lsm_interface.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/netlabel/lsm_interface.rst | 53 |
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/netlabel/lsm_interface.rst b/Documentation/netlabel/lsm_interface.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..026fc267f --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/netlabel/lsm_interface.rst @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +======================================== +NetLabel Linux Security Module Interface +======================================== + +Paul Moore, paul.moore@hp.com + +May 17, 2006 + +Overview +======== + +NetLabel is a mechanism which can set and retrieve security attributes from +network packets. It is intended to be used by LSM developers who want to make +use of a common code base for several different packet labeling protocols. +The NetLabel security module API is defined in 'include/net/netlabel.h' but a +brief overview is given below. + +NetLabel Security Attributes +============================ + +Since NetLabel supports multiple different packet labeling protocols and LSMs +it uses the concept of security attributes to refer to the packet's security +labels. The NetLabel security attributes are defined by the +'netlbl_lsm_secattr' structure in the NetLabel header file. Internally the +NetLabel subsystem converts the security attributes to and from the correct +low-level packet label depending on the NetLabel build time and run time +configuration. It is up to the LSM developer to translate the NetLabel +security attributes into whatever security identifiers are in use for their +particular LSM. + +NetLabel LSM Protocol Operations +================================ + +These are the functions which allow the LSM developer to manipulate the labels +on outgoing packets as well as read the labels on incoming packets. Functions +exist to operate both on sockets as well as the sk_buffs directly. These high +level functions are translated into low level protocol operations based on how +the administrator has configured the NetLabel subsystem. + +NetLabel Label Mapping Cache Operations +======================================= + +Depending on the exact configuration, translation between the network packet +label and the internal LSM security identifier can be time consuming. The +NetLabel label mapping cache is a caching mechanism which can be used to +sidestep much of this overhead once a mapping has been established. Once the +LSM has received a packet, used NetLabel to decode its security attributes, +and translated the security attributes into a LSM internal identifier the LSM +can use the NetLabel caching functions to associate the LSM internal +identifier with the network packet's label. This means that in the future +when a incoming packet matches a cached value not only are the internal +NetLabel translation mechanisms bypassed but the LSM translation mechanisms are +bypassed as well which should result in a significant reduction in overhead. |
