summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/filesystems/ecryptfs.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>2026-09-02 15:31:14 -0700
committerKees Cook <kees@kernel.org>2026-09-04 21:37:00 -0700
commit3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d (patch)
treec65086f9bdcd48c6360fb7cb4598bca084da1f32 /Documentation/filesystems/ecryptfs.rst
downloadlinux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.tar.gz
linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.zip
treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversionsgrafted
This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc() family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's "--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control flow indicator I could find. Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc, riscv, and s390 with no new warnings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1] Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/filesystems/ecryptfs.rst')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/filesystems/ecryptfs.rst86
1 files changed, 86 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/ecryptfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/ecryptfs.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1f2edef4c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/ecryptfs.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+======================================================
+eCryptfs: A stacked cryptographic filesystem for Linux
+======================================================
+
+eCryptfs is free software. Please see the file COPYING for details.
+For documentation, please see the files in the doc/ subdirectory. For
+building and installation instructions please see the INSTALL file.
+
+:Maintainer: Phillip Hellewell
+:Lead developer: Michael A. Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com>
+:Developers: Michael C. Thompson
+ Kent Yoder
+:Web Site: http://ecryptfs.sf.net
+
+This software is currently undergoing development. Make sure to
+maintain a backup copy of any data you write into eCryptfs.
+
+eCryptfs requires the userspace tools downloadable from the
+SourceForge site:
+
+http://sourceforge.net/projects/ecryptfs/
+
+Userspace requirements include:
+
+- David Howells' userspace keyring headers and libraries (version
+ 1.0 or higher), obtainable from
+ http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/keyutils/
+- Libgcrypt
+
+
+.. note::
+
+ In the beta/experimental releases of eCryptfs, when you upgrade
+ eCryptfs, you should copy the files to an unencrypted location and
+ then copy the files back into the new eCryptfs mount to migrate the
+ files.
+
+
+Mount-wide Passphrase
+=====================
+
+Create a new directory into which eCryptfs will write its encrypted
+files (i.e., /root/crypt). Then, create the mount point directory
+(i.e., /mnt/crypt). Now it's time to mount eCryptfs::
+
+ mount -t ecryptfs /root/crypt /mnt/crypt
+
+You should be prompted for a passphrase and a salt (the salt may be
+blank).
+
+Try writing a new file::
+
+ echo "Hello, World" > /mnt/crypt/hello.txt
+
+The operation will complete. Notice that there is a new file in
+/root/crypt that is at least 12288 bytes in size (depending on your
+host page size). This is the encrypted underlying file for what you
+just wrote. To test reading, from start to finish, you need to clear
+the user session keyring:
+
+keyctl clear @u
+
+Then umount /mnt/crypt and mount again per the instructions given
+above.
+
+::
+
+ cat /mnt/crypt/hello.txt
+
+
+Notes
+=====
+
+eCryptfs version 0.1 should only be mounted on (1) empty directories
+or (2) directories containing files only created by eCryptfs. If you
+mount a directory that has pre-existing files not created by eCryptfs,
+then behavior is undefined. Do not run eCryptfs in higher verbosity
+levels unless you are doing so for the sole purpose of debugging or
+development, since secret values will be written out to the system log
+in that case.
+
+
+Mike Halcrow
+mhalcrow@us.ibm.com