summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/edac
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAdrian Betschart <adrian.betschart@cinemaone.ch>2026-09-11 17:13:14 +0200
committerAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>2026-10-01 17:18:05 -0400
commit106b4a2a78b2a2f14885604891957b84bba502db (patch)
tree5d40eef2428fb1a4791ab46a4b19091a5910eac2 /Documentation/edac
downloadlinux-stable-106b4a2a78b2a2f14885604891957b84bba502db.tar.gz
linux-stable-106b4a2a78b2a2f14885604891957b84bba502db.zip
drm/amd/display: Try RGB before YCbCr 4:4:4 in stream validationgrafted
amdgpu_dm_create_validate_stream_for_sink() walks encoding_order[] and uses the first encoding that validates. YCbCr 4:4:4 is listed before RGB, so an HDMI sink that advertises 4:4:4 gets YCbCr 4:4:4 whenever the "color format" property is left at AUTO, even though RGB fits the same link. That contradicts the documented AUTO behaviour for HDMI in enum drm_connector_color_format (RGB, falling back to YCbCr 4:2:0 only when the bandwidth is not available or the mode is 4:2:0-only), which the amdgpu implementation of the property also describes. It also leaves the "Broadcast RGB" property without effect on such sinks, since the quantization range it selects only applies to RGB output. Try RGB first. The mask still holds every encoding the sink supports, so a mode that cannot carry RGB falls back exactly as before. For reference, v7.2 picked RGB here unless YCbCr 4:4:4 was forced through debugfs, while earlier kernels picked YCbCr 4:4:4 for any HDMI sink that advertised it. Fixes: 0b0ff65d3ca1 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor stream validation") Suggested-by: Adolfo Rodrigues <adolfotregosa@gmail.com> Assisted-by: Claude Code:claude-fable-5-1 Signed-off-by: Adrian Betschart <adrian.betschart@cinemaone.ch> Reviewed-by: Fangzhi Zuo <jerry.zuo@amd.com> Tested-by: Adolfo Rodrigues <adolfotregosa@gmail.com> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 7de432bc753133764dc40d37f9388da56de251e7)
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/edac')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/edac/features.rst103
-rw-r--r--Documentation/edac/index.rst12
-rw-r--r--Documentation/edac/memory_repair.rst152
-rw-r--r--Documentation/edac/scrub.rst342
4 files changed, 609 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/edac/features.rst b/Documentation/edac/features.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3f283de29
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/edac/features.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR GFDL-1.2-no-invariants-or-later
+
+=================
+EDAC/RAS features
+=================
+
+Copyright (c) 2024-2025 HiSilicon Limited.
+
+:Author: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
+:License: The GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 without
+ Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts nor Back-Cover Texts.
+ (dual licensed under the GPL v2)
+
+- Written for: 6.15
+
+Introduction
+------------
+
+EDAC/RAS components plugging and high-level design:
+
+1. Scrub control
+
+2. Error Check Scrub (ECS) control
+
+3. ACPI RAS2 features
+
+4. Post Package Repair (PPR) control
+
+5. Memory Sparing Repair control
+
+High level design is illustrated in the following diagram::
+
+ +-----------------------------------------------+
+ | Userspace - Rasdaemon |
+ | +-------------+ |
+ | | RAS CXL mem | +---------------+ |
+ | |error handler|---->| | |
+ | +-------------+ | RAS dynamic | |
+ | +-------------+ | scrub, memory | |
+ | | RAS memory |---->| repair control| |
+ | |error handler| +----|----------+ |
+ | +-------------+ | |
+ +--------------------------|--------------------+
+ |
+ |
+ +-------------------------------|------------------------------+
+ | Kernel EDAC extension for | controlling RAS Features |
+ |+------------------------------|----------------------------+ |
+ || EDAC Core Sysfs EDAC| Bus | |
+ || +--------------------------|---------------------------+| |
+ || |/sys/bus/edac/devices/<dev>/scrubX/ | | EDAC device || |
+ || |/sys/bus/edac/devices/<dev>/ecsX/ |<->| EDAC MC || |
+ || |/sys/bus/edac/devices/<dev>/repairX | | EDAC sysfs || |
+ || +---------------------------|--------------------------+| |
+ || EDAC|Bus | |
+ || | | |
+ || +----------+ Get feature | Get feature | |
+ || | | desc +---------|------+ desc +----------+ | |
+ || |EDAC scrub|<-----| EDAC device | | | | |
+ || +----------+ | driver- RAS |----->| EDAC mem | | |
+ || +----------+ | feature control| | repair | | |
+ || | |<-----| | +----------+ | |
+ || |EDAC ECS | +---------|------+ | |
+ || +----------+ Register RAS|features | |
+ || ______________________|_____________ | |
+ |+---------|---------------|------------------|--------------+ |
+ | +-------|----+ +-------|-------+ +----|----------+ |
+ | | | | CXL mem driver| | Client driver | |
+ | | ACPI RAS2 | | scrub, ECS, | | memory repair | |
+ | | driver | | sparing, PPR | | features | |
+ | +-----|------+ +-------|-------+ +------|--------+ |
+ | | | | |
+ +--------|-----------------|--------------------|--------------+
+ | | |
+ +--------|-----------------|--------------------|--------------+
+ | +---|-----------------|--------------------|-------+ |
+ | | | |
+ | | Platform HW and Firmware | |
+ | +--------------------------------------------------+ |
+ +--------------------------------------------------------------+
+
+
+1. EDAC Features components - Create feature-specific descriptors. For
+ example: scrub, ECS, memory repair in the above diagram.
+
+2. EDAC device driver for controlling RAS Features - Get feature's attribute
+ descriptors from EDAC RAS feature component and registers device's RAS
+ features with EDAC bus and expose the features control attributes via
+ sysfs. For example, /sys/bus/edac/devices/<dev-name>/<feature>X/
+
+3. RAS dynamic feature controller - Userspace sample modules in rasdaemon for
+ dynamic scrub/repair control to issue scrubbing/repair when excess number
+ of corrected memory errors are reported in a short span of time.
+
+RAS features
+------------
+1. Memory Scrub
+
+Memory scrub features are documented in `Documentation/edac/scrub.rst`.
+
+2. Memory Repair
+
+Memory repair features are documented in `Documentation/edac/memory_repair.rst`.
diff --git a/Documentation/edac/index.rst b/Documentation/edac/index.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..420c6601d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/edac/index.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR GFDL-1.2-no-invariants-or-later
+
+==============
+EDAC Subsystem
+==============
+
+.. toctree::
+ :maxdepth: 1
+
+ features
+ memory_repair
+ scrub
diff --git a/Documentation/edac/memory_repair.rst b/Documentation/edac/memory_repair.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5f8da7c9b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/edac/memory_repair.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR GFDL-1.2-no-invariants-or-later
+
+==========================
+EDAC Memory Repair Control
+==========================
+
+Copyright (c) 2024-2025 HiSilicon Limited.
+
+:Author: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
+:License: The GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 without
+ Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts nor Back-Cover Texts.
+ (dual licensed under the GPL v2)
+:Original Reviewers:
+
+- Written for: 6.15
+
+Introduction
+------------
+
+Some memory devices support repair operations to address issues in their
+memory media. Post Package Repair (PPR) and memory sparing are examples of
+such features.
+
+Post Package Repair (PPR)
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Post Package Repair is a maintenance operation which requests the memory
+device to perform repair operation on its media. It is a memory self-healing
+feature that fixes a failing memory location by replacing it with a spare row
+in a DRAM device.
+
+For example, a CXL memory device with DRAM components that support PPR
+features implements maintenance operations. DRAM components support those
+types of PPR functions:
+
+ - hard PPR, for a permanent row repair, and
+ - soft PPR, for a temporary row repair.
+
+Soft PPR is much faster than hard PPR, but the repair is lost after a power
+cycle.
+
+The data may not be retained and memory requests may not be correctly
+processed during a repair operation. In such case, the repair operation should
+not be executed at runtime.
+
+For example, for CXL memory devices, see CXL spec rev 3.1 [1]_ sections
+8.2.9.7.1.1 PPR Maintenance Operations, 8.2.9.7.1.2 sPPR Maintenance Operation
+and 8.2.9.7.1.3 hPPR Maintenance Operation for more details.
+
+Memory Sparing
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Memory sparing is a repair function that replaces a portion of memory with
+a portion of functional memory at a particular granularity. Memory
+sparing has cacheline/row/bank/rank sparing granularities. For example, in
+rank memory-sparing mode, one memory rank serves as a spare for other ranks on
+the same channel in case they fail.
+
+The spare rank is held in reserve and not used as active memory until
+a failure is indicated, with reserved capacity subtracted from the total
+available memory in the system.
+
+After an error threshold is surpassed in a system protected by memory sparing,
+the content of a failing rank of DIMMs is copied to the spare rank. The
+failing rank is then taken offline and the spare rank placed online for use as
+active memory in place of the failed rank.
+
+For example, CXL memory devices can support various subclasses for sparing
+operation vary in terms of the scope of the sparing being performed.
+
+Cacheline sparing subclass refers to a sparing action that can replace a full
+cacheline. Row sparing is provided as an alternative to PPR sparing functions
+and its scope is that of a single DDR row. Bank sparing allows an entire bank
+to be replaced. Rank sparing is defined as an operation in which an entire DDR
+rank is replaced.
+
+See CXL spec 3.1 [1]_ section 8.2.9.7.1.4 Memory Sparing Maintenance
+Operations for more details.
+
+.. [1] https://computeexpresslink.org/cxl-specification/
+
+Use cases of generic memory repair features control
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+1. The soft PPR, hard PPR and memory-sparing features share similar control
+ attributes. Therefore, there is a need for a standardized, generic sysfs
+ repair control that is exposed to userspace and used by administrators,
+ scripts and tools.
+
+2. When a CXL device detects an error in a memory component, it informs the
+ host of the need for a repair maintenance operation by using an event
+ record where the "maintenance needed" flag is set. The event record
+ specifies the device physical address (DPA) and attributes of the memory
+ that requires repair. The kernel reports the corresponding CXL general
+ media or DRAM trace event to userspace, and userspace tools (e.g.
+ rasdaemon) initiate a repair maintenance operation in response to the
+ device request using the sysfs repair control.
+
+3. Userspace tools, such as rasdaemon, request a repair operation on a memory
+ region when maintenance need flag set or an uncorrected memory error or
+ excess of corrected memory errors above a threshold value is reported or an
+ exceed corrected errors threshold flag set for that memory.
+
+4. Multiple PPR/sparing instances may be present per memory device.
+
+5. Drivers should enforce that live repair is safe. In systems where memory
+ mapping functions can change between boots, one approach to this is to log
+ memory errors seen on this boot against which to check live memory repair
+ requests.
+
+The File System
+---------------
+
+The control attributes of a registered memory repair instance could be
+accessed in the /sys/bus/edac/devices/<dev-name>/mem_repairX/
+
+sysfs
+-----
+
+Sysfs files are documented in
+`Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-edac-memory-repair`.
+
+Examples
+--------
+
+The memory repair usage takes the form shown in this example:
+
+1. CXL memory sparing
+
+Memory sparing is defined as a repair function that replaces a portion of
+memory with a portion of functional memory at that same DPA. The subclass
+for this operation, cacheline/row/bank/rank sparing, vary in terms of the
+scope of the sparing being performed.
+
+Memory sparing maintenance operations may be supported by CXL devices that
+implement CXL.mem protocol. A sparing maintenance operation requests the
+CXL device to perform a repair operation on its media. For example, a CXL
+device with DRAM components that support memory sparing features may
+implement sparing maintenance operations.
+
+2. CXL memory Soft Post Package Repair (sPPR)
+
+Post Package Repair (PPR) maintenance operations may be supported by CXL
+devices that implement CXL.mem protocol. A PPR maintenance operation
+requests the CXL device to perform a repair operation on its media.
+For example, a CXL device with DRAM components that support PPR features
+may implement PPR Maintenance operations. Soft PPR (sPPR) is a temporary
+row repair. Soft PPR may be faster, but the repair is lost with a power
+cycle.
+
+Sysfs files for memory repair are documented in
+`Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-edac-memory-repair`
diff --git a/Documentation/edac/scrub.rst b/Documentation/edac/scrub.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2cfa74fa1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/edac/scrub.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,342 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR GFDL-1.2-no-invariants-or-later
+
+=============
+Scrub Control
+=============
+
+Copyright (c) 2024-2025 HiSilicon Limited.
+
+:Author: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
+:License: The GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 without
+ Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts nor Back-Cover Texts.
+ (dual licensed under the GPL v2)
+
+- Written for: 6.15
+
+Introduction
+------------
+
+Increasing DRAM size and cost have made memory subsystem reliability an
+important concern. These modules are used where potentially corrupted data
+could cause expensive or fatal issues. Memory errors are among the top
+hardware failures that cause server and workload crashes.
+
+Memory scrubbing is a feature where an ECC (Error-Correcting Code) engine
+reads data from each memory media location, corrects if necessary and writes
+the corrected data back to the same memory media location.
+
+DIMMs can be scrubbed at a configurable rate to detect uncorrected memory
+errors and attempt recovery from detected errors, providing the following
+benefits:
+
+1. Proactively scrubbing DIMMs reduces the chance of a correctable error
+ becoming uncorrectable.
+
+2. When detected, uncorrected errors caught in unallocated memory pages are
+ isolated and prevented from being allocated to an application or the OS.
+
+3. This reduces the likelihood of software or hardware products encountering
+ memory errors.
+
+4. The additional data on failures in memory may be used to build up
+ statistics that are later used to decide whether to use memory repair
+ technologies such as Post Package Repair or Sparing.
+
+There are 2 types of memory scrubbing:
+
+1. Background (patrol) scrubbing while the DRAM is otherwise idle.
+
+2. On-demand scrubbing for a specific address range or region of memory.
+
+Several types of interfaces to hardware memory scrubbers have been
+identified, such as CXL memory device patrol scrub, CXL DDR5 ECS, ACPI
+RAS2 memory scrubbing, and ACPI NVDIMM ARS (Address Range Scrub).
+
+The control mechanisms vary across different memory scrubbers. To enable
+standardized userspace tooling, there is a need to present these controls
+through a standardized ABI.
+
+A generic memory EDAC scrub control allows users to manage underlying
+scrubbers in the system through a standardized sysfs control interface. It
+abstracts the management of various scrubbing functionalities into a unified
+set of functions.
+
+Use cases of common scrub control feature
+-----------------------------------------
+
+1. Several types of interfaces for hardware memory scrubbers have been
+ identified, including the CXL memory device patrol scrub, CXL DDR5 ECS,
+ ACPI RAS2 memory scrubbing features, ACPI NVDIMM ARS (Address Range Scrub),
+ and software-based memory scrubbers.
+
+ Of the identified interfaces to hardware memory scrubbers some support
+ control over patrol (background) scrubbing (e.g., ACPI RAS2, CXL) and/or
+ on-demand scrubbing (e.g., ACPI RAS2, ACPI ARS). However, the scrub control
+ interfaces vary between memory scrubbers, highlighting the need for
+ a standardized, generic sysfs scrub control interface that is accessible to
+ userspace for administration and use by scripts/tools.
+
+2. User-space scrub controls allow users to disable scrubbing if necessary,
+ for example, to disable background patrol scrubbing or adjust the scrub
+ rate for performance-aware operations where background activities need to
+ be minimized or disabled.
+
+3. User-space tools enable on-demand scrubbing for specific address ranges,
+ provided that the scrubber supports this functionality.
+
+4. User-space tools can also control memory DIMM scrubbing at a configurable
+ scrub rate via sysfs scrub controls. This approach offers several benefits:
+
+ 4.1. Detects uncorrectable memory errors early, before user access to affected
+ memory, helping facilitate recovery.
+
+ 4.2. Reduces the likelihood of correctable errors developing into uncorrectable
+ errors.
+
+5. Policy control for hotplugged memory is necessary because there may not
+ be a system-wide BIOS or similar control to manage scrub settings for a CXL
+ device added after boot. Determining these settings is a policy decision,
+ balancing reliability against performance, so userspace should control it.
+ Therefore, a unified interface is recommended for handling this function in
+ a way that aligns with other similar interfaces, rather than creating a
+ separate one.
+
+Scrubbing features
+------------------
+
+CXL Memory Scrubbing features
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+CXL spec r3.1 [1]_ section 8.2.9.9.11.1 describes the memory device patrol
+scrub control feature. The device patrol scrub proactively locates and makes
+corrections to errors in regular cycle. The patrol scrub control allows the
+userspace request to change CXL patrol scrubber's configurations.
+
+The patrol scrub control allows the requester to specify the number of
+hours in which the patrol scrub cycles must be completed, provided that
+the requested scrub rate must be within the supported range of the
+scrub rate that the device is capable of. In the CXL driver, the
+number of seconds per scrub cycles, which user requests via sysfs, is
+rescaled to hours per scrub cycles.
+
+In addition, they allow the host to disable the feature in case it interferes
+with performance-aware operations which require the background operations to
+be turned off.
+
+Error Check Scrub (ECS)
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+CXL spec r3.1 [1]_ section 8.2.9.9.11.2 describes Error Check Scrub (ECS)
+- a feature defined in the JEDEC DDR5 SDRAM Specification (JESD79-5) and
+allowing DRAM to internally read, correct single-bit errors, and write back
+corrected data bits to the DRAM array while providing transparency to error
+counts.
+
+The DDR5 device contains number of memory media Field Replaceable Units (FRU)
+per device. The DDR5 ECS feature and thus the ECS control driver supports
+configuring the ECS parameters per FRU.
+
+ACPI RAS2 Hardware-based Memory Scrubbing
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+ACPI spec 6.5 [2]_ section 5.2.21 ACPI RAS2 describes an ACPI RAS2 table
+which provides interfaces for platform RAS features and supports independent
+RAS controls and capabilities for a given RAS feature for multiple instances
+of the same component in a given system.
+
+Memory RAS features apply to RAS capabilities, controls and operations that
+are specific to memory. RAS2 PCC sub-spaces for memory-specific RAS features
+have a Feature Type of 0x00 (Memory).
+
+The platform can use the hardware-based memory scrubbing feature to expose
+controls and capabilities associated with hardware-based memory scrub
+engines. The RAS2 memory scrubbing feature supports as per spec,
+
+1. Independent memory scrubbing controls for each NUMA domain, identified
+ using its proximity domain.
+
+2. Provision for background (patrol) scrubbing of the entire memory system,
+ as well as on-demand scrubbing for a specific region of memory.
+
+ACPI Address Range Scrubbing (ARS)
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+ACPI spec 6.5 [2]_ section 9.19.7.2 describes Address Range Scrubbing (ARS).
+ARS allows the platform to communicate memory errors to system software.
+This capability allows system software to prevent accesses to addresses with
+uncorrectable errors in memory. ARS functions manage all NVDIMMs present in
+the system. Only one scrub can be in progress system wide at any given time.
+
+The following functions are supported as per the specification:
+
+1. Query ARS Capabilities for a given address range, indicates platform
+ supports the ACPI NVDIMM Root Device Unconsumed Error Notification.
+
+2. Start ARS triggers an Address Range Scrub for the given memory range.
+ Address scrubbing can be done for volatile or persistent memory, or both.
+
+3. Query ARS Status command allows software to get the status of ARS,
+ including the progress of ARS and ARS error record.
+
+4. Clear Uncorrectable Error.
+
+5. Translate SPA
+
+6. ARS Error Inject etc.
+
+The kernel supports an existing control for ARS and ARS is currently not
+supported in EDAC.
+
+.. [1] https://computeexpresslink.org/cxl-specification/
+
+.. [2] https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/
+
+Comparison of various scrubbing features
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+ +--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+ | | ACPI | CXL patrol| CXL ECS | ARS |
+ | Name | RAS2 | scrub | | |
+ +--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+ | | | | | |
+ | On-demand | Supported | No | No | Supported |
+ | Scrubbing | | | | |
+ | | | | | |
+ +--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+ | | | | | |
+ | Background | Supported | Supported | Supported | No |
+ | scrubbing | | | | |
+ | | | | | |
+ +--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+ | | | | | |
+ | Mode of | Scrub ctrl| per device| per memory| Unknown |
+ | scrubbing | per NUMA | | media | |
+ | | domain. | | | |
+ +--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+ | | | | | |
+ | Query scrub | Supported | Supported | Supported | Supported |
+ | capabilities | | | | |
+ | | | | | |
+ +--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+ | | | | | |
+ | Setting | Supported | No | No | Supported |
+ | address range| | | | |
+ | | | | | |
+ +--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+ | | | | | |
+ | Setting | Supported | Supported | No | No |
+ | scrub rate | | | | |
+ | | | | | |
+ +--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+ | | | | | |
+ | Unit for | Not | in hours | No | No |
+ | scrub rate | Defined | | | |
+ | | | | | |
+ +--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+ | | Supported | | | |
+ | Scrub | on-demand | No | No | Supported |
+ | status/ | scrubbing | | | |
+ | Completion | only | | | |
+ +--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+ | UC error | |CXL general|CXL general| ACPI UCE |
+ | reporting | Exception |media/DRAM |media/DRAM | notify and|
+ | | |event/media|event/media| query |
+ | | |scan? |scan? | ARS status|
+ +--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+ | | | | | |
+ | Support for | Supported | Supported | Supported | No |
+ | EDAC control | | | | |
+ | | | | | |
+ +--------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+
+The File System
+---------------
+
+The control attributes of a registered scrubber instance could be
+accessed in:
+
+/sys/bus/edac/devices/<dev-name>/scrubX/
+
+sysfs
+-----
+
+Sysfs files are documented in
+`Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-edac-scrub`
+
+`Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-edac-ecs`
+
+Examples
+--------
+
+The usage takes the form shown in these examples:
+
+1. CXL memory Patrol Scrub
+
+The following are the use cases identified why we might increase the scrub rate.
+
+- Scrubbing is needed at device granularity because a device is showing
+ unexpectedly high errors.
+
+- Scrubbing may apply to memory that isn't online at all yet. Likely this
+ is a system wide default setting on boot.
+
+- Scrubbing at a higher rate because the monitor software has determined that
+ more reliability is necessary for a particular data set. This is called
+ Differentiated Reliability.
+
+1.1. Device based scrubbing
+
+CXL memory is exposed to memory management subsystem and ultimately userspace
+via CXL devices. Device-based scrubbing is used for the first use case
+described in "Section 1 CXL Memory Patrol Scrub".
+
+When combining control via the device interfaces and region interfaces,
+"see Section 1.2 Region based scrubbing".
+
+Sysfs files for scrubbing are documented in
+`Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-edac-scrub`
+
+1.2. Region based scrubbing
+
+CXL memory is exposed to memory management subsystem and ultimately userspace
+via CXL regions. CXL Regions represent mapped memory capacity in system
+physical address space. These can incorporate one or more parts of multiple CXL
+memory devices with traffic interleaved across them. The user may want to control
+the scrub rate via this more abstract region instead of having to figure out the
+constituent devices and program them separately. The scrub rate for each device
+covers the whole device. Thus if multiple regions use parts of that device then
+requests for scrubbing of other regions may result in a higher scrub rate than
+requested for this specific region.
+
+Region-based scrubbing is used for the third use case described in
+"Section 1 CXL Memory Patrol Scrub".
+
+Userspace must follow below set of rules on how to set the scrub rates for any
+mixture of requirements.
+
+1. Taking each region in turn from lowest desired scrub rate to highest and set
+ their scrub rates. Later regions may override the scrub rate on individual
+ devices (and hence potentially whole regions).
+
+2. Take each device for which enhanced scrubbing is required (higher rate) and
+ set those scrub rates. This will override the scrub rates of individual devices,
+ setting them to the maximum rate required for any of the regions they help back,
+ unless a specific rate is already defined.
+
+Sysfs files for scrubbing are documented in
+`Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-edac-scrub`
+
+2. CXL memory Error Check Scrub (ECS)
+
+The Error Check Scrub (ECS) feature enables a memory device to perform error
+checking and correction (ECC) and count single-bit errors. The associated
+memory controller sets the ECS mode with a trigger sent to the memory
+device. CXL ECS control allows the host, thus the userspace, to change the
+attributes for error count mode, threshold number of errors per segment
+(indicating how many segments have at least that number of errors) for
+reporting errors, and reset the ECS counter. Thus the responsibility for
+initiating Error Check Scrub on a memory device may lie with the memory
+controller or platform when unexpectedly high error rates are detected.
+
+Sysfs files for scrubbing are documented in
+`Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-edac-ecs`