summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/driver-api/wbrf.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>2026-09-02 15:31:14 -0700
committerKees Cook <kees@kernel.org>2026-09-04 21:37:00 -0700
commit3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d (patch)
treec65086f9bdcd48c6360fb7cb4598bca084da1f32 /Documentation/driver-api/wbrf.rst
downloadlinux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.tar.gz
linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.zip
treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversionsgrafted
This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc() family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's "--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control flow indicator I could find. Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc, riscv, and s390 with no new warnings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1] Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/driver-api/wbrf.rst')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/driver-api/wbrf.rst78
1 files changed, 78 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/wbrf.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/wbrf.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6b18833e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/wbrf.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+
+=================================
+WBRF - Wifi Band RFI Mitigations
+=================================
+
+Due to electrical and mechanical constraints in certain platform designs
+there may be likely interference of relatively high-powered harmonics of
+the GPU memory clocks with local radio module frequency bands used by
+certain Wifi bands.
+
+To mitigate possible RFI interference producers can advertise the
+frequencies in use and consumers can use this information to avoid using
+these frequencies for sensitive features.
+
+When a platform is known to have this issue with any contained devices,
+the platform designer will advertise the availability of this feature via
+ACPI devices with a device specific method (_DSM).
+* Producers with this _DSM will be able to advertise the frequencies in use.
+* Consumers with this _DSM will be able to register for notifications of
+frequencies in use.
+
+Some general terms
+==================
+
+Producer: such component who can produce high-powered radio frequency
+Consumer: such component who can adjust its in-use frequency in
+response to the radio frequencies of other components to mitigate the
+possible RFI.
+
+To make the mechanism function, those producers should notify active use
+of their particular frequencies so that other consumers can make relative
+internal adjustments as necessary to avoid this resonance.
+
+ACPI interface
+==============
+
+Although initially used by for wifi + dGPU use cases, the ACPI interface
+can be scaled to any type of device that a platform designer discovers
+can cause interference.
+
+The GUID used for the _DSM is 7B7656CF-DC3D-4C1C-83E9-66E721DE3070.
+
+3 functions are available in this _DSM:
+
+* 0: discover # of functions available
+* 1: record RF bands in use
+* 2: retrieve RF bands in use
+
+Driver programming interface
+============================
+
+.. kernel-doc:: drivers/platform/x86/amd/wbrf.c
+
+Sample Usage
+=============
+
+The expected flow for the producers:
+1. During probe, call `acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_producer` to check if WBRF
+can be enabled for the device.
+2. On using some frequency band, call `acpi_amd_wbrf_add_remove` with 'add'
+param to get other consumers properly notified.
+3. Or on stopping using some frequency band, call
+`acpi_amd_wbrf_add_remove` with 'remove' param to get other consumers notified.
+
+The expected flow for the consumers:
+1. During probe, call `acpi_amd_wbrf_supported_consumer` to check if WBRF
+can be enabled for the device.
+2. Call `amd_wbrf_register_notifier` to register for notification
+of frequency band change(add or remove) from other producers.
+3. Call the `amd_wbrf_retrieve_freq_band` initially to retrieve
+current active frequency bands considering some producers may broadcast
+such information before the consumer is up.
+4. On receiving a notification for frequency band change, run
+`amd_wbrf_retrieve_freq_band` again to retrieve the latest
+active frequency bands.
+5. During driver cleanup, call `amd_wbrf_unregister_notifier` to
+unregister the notifier.