diff options
| author | Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com> | 2026-09-02 00:21:26 +0900 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com> | 2026-09-07 02:24:53 +0100 |
| commit | e24328974a88aa8541e94e8bb8dfa2ade1b3c45d (patch) | |
| tree | 43a2533acc955d11f5cb8be1ecba0ab8ba4cbb1e /Documentation/driver-api/pwrseq.rst | |
| download | linux-stable-e24328974a88aa8541e94e8bb8dfa2ade1b3c45d.tar.gz linux-stable-e24328974a88aa8541e94e8bb8dfa2ade1b3c45d.zip | |
iio: proximity: vl53l0x-i2c: claim direct mode for raw readsgrafted
vl53l0x_read_raw() starts a single-shot ranging measurement and reads
back the result. Once the triggered buffer is enabled the sensor runs in
continuous mode and its data-ready interrupt is routed to the trigger,
so a concurrent in_distance_raw read disturbs the streaming setup and
never gets its completion, returning -ETIMEDOUT.
The original submission claimed direct mode here, but it was dropped
during review because the driver had no buffer support at the time [1].
Continuous (buffered) mode was later added without restoring the
claim [2], reintroducing the conflict.
Reject direct reads while buffered capture is active by claiming direct
mode around the measurement, as the vl53l1x sibling already does.
Fixes: 762186c6e7b1 ("iio: proximity: vl53l0x-i2c: Added continuous mode support")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20180911160300.GA9212@himanshu-Vostro-3559/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240909101508.263085-3-abhashkumarjha123@gmail.com/ [2]
Signed-off-by: Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/driver-api/pwrseq.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/driver-api/pwrseq.rst | 95 |
1 files changed, 95 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/pwrseq.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/pwrseq.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e1056d141 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/pwrseq.rst @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +.. Copyright 2024 Linaro Ltd. + +==================== +Power Sequencing API +==================== + +:Author: Bartosz Golaszewski + +Introduction +============ + +This framework is designed to abstract complex power-up sequences that are +shared between multiple logical devices in the Linux kernel. + +The intention is to allow consumers to obtain a power sequencing handle +exposed by the power sequence provider and delegate the actual requesting and +control of the underlying resources as well as to allow the provider to +mitigate any potential conflicts between multiple users behind the scenes. + +Glossary +-------- + +The power sequencing API uses a number of terms specific to the subsystem: + +Unit + + A unit is a discrete chunk of a power sequence. For instance one unit may + enable a set of regulators, another may enable a specific GPIO. Units can + define dependencies in the form of other units that must be enabled before + it itself can be. + +Target + + A target is a set of units (composed of the "final" unit and its + dependencies) that a consumer selects by its name when requesting a handle + to the power sequencer. Via the dependency system, multiple targets may + share the same parts of a power sequence but ignore parts that are + irrelevant. + +Descriptor + + A handle passed by the pwrseq core to every consumer that serves as the + entry point to the provider layer. It ensures coherence between different + users and keeps reference counting consistent. + +Consumer interface +================== + +The consumer API is aimed to be as simple as possible. The driver interested in +getting a descriptor from the power sequencer should call pwrseq_get() and +specify the name of the target it wants to reach in the sequence after calling +pwrseq_enable(). The descriptor can be released by calling pwrseq_put() and +the consumer can request the powering down of its target with +pwrseq_disable(). Note that there is no guarantee that pwrseq_disable() +will have any effect as there may be multiple users of the underlying resources +who may keep them active. + +Provider interface +================== + +The provider API is admittedly not nearly as straightforward as the one for +consumers but it makes up for it in flexibility. + +Each provider can logically split the power-up sequence into discrete chunks +(units) and define their dependencies. They can then expose named targets that +consumers may use as the final point in the sequence that they wish to reach. + +To that end the providers fill out a set of configuration structures and +register with the pwrseq subsystem by calling pwrseq_device_register(). + +Dynamic consumer matching +------------------------- + +The main difference between pwrseq and other Linux kernel providers is the +mechanism for dynamic matching of consumers and providers. Every power sequence +provider driver must implement the `match()` callback and pass it to the pwrseq +core when registering with the subsystems. + +When a client requests a sequencer handle, the core will call this callback for +every registered provider and let it flexibly figure out whether the proposed +client device is indeed its consumer. For example: if the provider binds to the +device-tree node representing a power management unit of a chipset and the +consumer driver controls one of its modules, the provider driver may parse the +relevant regulator supply properties in device tree and see if they lead from +the PMU to the consumer. + +API reference +============= + +.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/pwrseq/provider.h + :internal: + +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/power/sequencing/core.c + :export: |
