diff options
| author | Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru> | 2026-08-31 10:58:09 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> | 2026-09-02 09:07:46 +0200 |
| commit | 4310c6b8e75d6a47f7548e5948fbe6318aa4440a (patch) | |
| tree | 0032b584d8e218681a48126eb91f57091c351b83 /Documentation/dev-tools/testing-devices.rst | |
| download | linux-stable-4310c6b8e75d6a47f7548e5948fbe6318aa4440a.tar.gz linux-stable-4310c6b8e75d6a47f7548e5948fbe6318aa4440a.zip | |
thunderbolt: Fix NULL dereference in tb_remove_work()grafted
There is a slight race between tb_remove_work() and tb_domain_remove()
which leads to dereferencing a NULL tb->root_switch pointer inside
tb_free_unplugged_xdomains():
Thread A Thread B
tb_remove_work()
tb_domain_remove()
mutex_lock(&tb->lock)
tb_stop()
/* doesn't cancel a running callback */
cancel_delayed_work(&tcm->remove_work)
...
tb_switch_remove(tb->root_switch)
tb->root_switch = NULL
mutex_unlock(&tb->lock)
mutex_lock(&tb->lock)
...
/* without checking ->root_switch */
tb_free_unplugged_xdomains(tb->root_switch)
mutex_unlock(&tb->lock)
Commit a8937f35cf39 ("thunderbolt: Remove XDomain from the bus without
holding tb->lock") doesn't seem right to move tb_free_unplugged_xdomains()
out of the &tb->lock section and the check for tb->root_switch, in
particular. It states:
For this reason separate removing the XDomain from the topology data
structures (where we need the lock) from unregistering the device from
the bus (where remove callbacks of the drivers are being called).
tb_free_unplugged_xdomains() belongs to the former group of functions
requiring the lock. And it also calls tb_xdomain_remove() which should
only be called with &tb->lock held.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace static
analysis tool.
Fixes: a8937f35cf39 ("thunderbolt: Remove XDomain from the bus without holding tb->lock")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/dev-tools/testing-devices.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/testing-devices.rst | 47 |
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-devices.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-devices.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ab26adb99 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-devices.rst @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +.. Copyright (c) 2024 Collabora Ltd + +============================= +Device testing with kselftest +============================= + + +There are a few different kselftests available for testing devices generically, +with some overlap in coverage and different requirements. This document aims to +give an overview of each one. + +Note: Paths in this document are relative to the kselftest folder +(``tools/testing/selftests``). + +Device oriented kselftests: + +* Devicetree (``dt``) + + * **Coverage**: Probe status for devices described in Devicetree + * **Requirements**: None + +* Error logs (``devices/error_logs``) + + * **Coverage**: Error (or more critical) log messages presence coming from any + device + * **Requirements**: None + +* Discoverable bus (``devices/probe``) + + * **Coverage**: Presence and probe status of USB or PCI devices that have been + described in the reference file + * **Requirements**: Manually describe the devices that should be tested in a + YAML reference file (see ``devices/probe/boards/google,spherion.yaml`` for + an example) + +* Exist (``devices/exist``) + + * **Coverage**: Presence of all devices + * **Requirements**: Generate the reference (see ``devices/exist/README.rst`` + for details) on a known-good kernel + +Therefore, the suggestion is to enable the error log and devicetree tests on all +(DT-based) platforms, since they don't have any requirements. Then to greatly +improve coverage, generate the reference for each platform and enable the exist +test. The discoverable bus test can be used to verify the probe status of +specific USB or PCI devices, but is probably not worth it for most cases. |
