diff options
| author | Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1@huawei.com> | 2026-07-28 03:16:42 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> | 2026-08-05 16:15:51 +0100 |
| commit | 1039bffd6ae9c75b42b7d148d6c1106134107b66 (patch) | |
| tree | e8ee4ac80f87e2ad1b6b0c877eccbb62b0915c02 /Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst | |
| download | linux-stable-1039bffd6ae9c75b42b7d148d6c1106134107b66.tar.gz linux-stable-1039bffd6ae9c75b42b7d148d6c1106134107b66.zip | |
ARM: 9485/1: mm: acquire mmap write lock around show_pte() for user faultsgrafted
When CONFIG_DEBUG_USER=y, and cmdline "user_debug=31" is set,
a user fault may trigger show_pte() without any lock.
If another thread in the same process concurrently calls munmap(),
the page table pages may be freed while show_pte() is still traversing
them, causing a use-after-free in show_pte().
If CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y, this may cause a kernel panic if the pages table
of PMD are freed when show_pte() is running.
Acquire mmap_write_lock() around show_pte() for user faults to fix the
contention.
For user faults, additionally restrict that show_pte() is called only
when the addr is a user-space address (addr < TASK_SIZE). This is because
the lock of tsk->mm only protects the virtual memory of user address space,
furthermore, dumping the page tables of a kernel-space address for user
faults is unnecessary and may have security implications.
Keep everything unchanged for kernel faults, because the kernel is
already in the "oops" state, acquiring a lock may risk a deadlock.
Co-developed-by: Qi Xi <xiqi2@huawei.com>
Fixes: 6d021b724481 ("ARM: dump pgd, pmd and pte states on unhandled data abort faults")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260716014022.2823-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Qi Xi <xiqi2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst | 85 |
1 files changed, 85 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..37b201708 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +.. Copyright 2004 Linus Torvalds +.. Copyright 2004 Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> +.. Copyright 2006 Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com> + +Sparse +====== + +Sparse is a semantic checker for C programs; it can be used to find a +number of potential problems with kernel code. See +https://lwn.net/Articles/689907/ for an overview of sparse; this document +contains some kernel-specific sparse information. +More information on sparse, mainly about its internals, can be found in +its official pages at https://sparse.docs.kernel.org. + + +Using sparse for typechecking +----------------------------- + +"__bitwise" is a type attribute, so you have to do something like this:: + + typedef int __bitwise pm_request_t; + + enum pm_request { + PM_SUSPEND = (__force pm_request_t) 1, + PM_RESUME = (__force pm_request_t) 2 + }; + +which makes PM_SUSPEND and PM_RESUME "bitwise" integers (the "__force" is +there because sparse will complain about casting to/from a bitwise type, +but in this case we really _do_ want to force the conversion). And because +the enum values are all the same type, now "enum pm_request" will be that +type too. + +And with gcc, all the "__bitwise"/"__force stuff" goes away, and it all +ends up looking just like integers to gcc. + +Quite frankly, you don't need the enum there. The above all really just +boils down to one special "int __bitwise" type. + +So the simpler way is to just do:: + + typedef int __bitwise pm_request_t; + + #define PM_SUSPEND ((__force pm_request_t) 1) + #define PM_RESUME ((__force pm_request_t) 2) + +and you now have all the infrastructure needed for strict typechecking. + +One small note: the constant integer "0" is special. You can use a +constant zero as a bitwise integer type without sparse ever complaining. +This is because "bitwise" (as the name implies) was designed for making +sure that bitwise types don't get mixed up (little-endian vs big-endian +vs cpu-endian vs whatever), and there the constant "0" really _is_ +special. + +Getting sparse +-------------- + +You can get tarballs of the latest released versions from: +https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/devel/sparse/dist/ + +Alternatively, you can get snapshots of the latest development version +of sparse using git to clone:: + + git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/sparse/sparse.git + +Once you have it, just do:: + + make + make install + +as a regular user, and it will install sparse in your ~/bin directory. + +Using sparse +------------ + +Do a kernel make with "make C=1" to run sparse on all the C files that get +recompiled, or use "make C=2" to run sparse on the files whether they need to +be recompiled or not. The latter is a fast way to check the whole tree if you +have already built it. + +The optional make variable CF can be used to pass arguments to sparse. The +build system passes -Wbitwise to sparse automatically. + +Note that sparse defines the __CHECKER__ preprocessor symbol. |
