Merge tag 'pinctrl-v7.3-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrlgrafted

Pull pin control updates from Linus Walleij:
 "Core changes:

   - Use the non-blocking mux_state_try_select() in the generic MUX pin
     control back-end

   - Free pin maps on pinctrl_generic_to_map() failure in the core
     helpers

  New hardware pin control:

   - Qualcomm Maili TLMM SoC, PMG1110 PMIC, and Eliza LPASS LPI TLMM SoC
     (this is for the low power audio, LPASS = Low Power Audio SubSystem
     portions)

   - Upboard support on top of the Intel pin controller

   - Apple T6030 and T6031 support (just compatible strings)

   - Samsung Exynos 8855 SoC

   - Mediatek MT6858 SoC

   - Rockchip RK3308B and RV1106 SoCs

   - Airoha EN7523 and AN7563 SoCs

  Improvements:

   - Qualcomm TLMM GPIOs are unconditionally marked as wakeup capable

   - Qualcomm improvements on top of the Qualcomm PDC (power domain
     controller) irqchip improvements from tglx:s tree

   - Qualcomm IPQ806x and IPQ9650 non-urgent pin grop fixups

   - The NPCM8xx driver has been put into shape fixing many pin and
     group definitions

   - Some non-urgent Tegra 264 pin assignments are fixed up

   - Some non-urgent fixups to Airoha AN7581 and AN7583 registers and
     pin assignments, missing features etc"

* tag 'pinctrl-v7.3-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl: (130 commits)
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: Convert TI DA850 pupd to DT schema
  pinctrl: meson: sync some modify from A4
  pinctrl: meson: a4: Add input enable pin configuration
  pinctrl: realtek: rtd1625: remove unused group name spdif_sel
  pinctrl: realtek: rtd1625: fix base_bit for VE4 GPIO 13
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: microchip,pic32mzda-pinctrl: Convert to DT schema
  Revert "Merge branch 'ib-rsk7204' into devel"
  pinctrl: rockchip: Add RV1106 pinctrl support
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: rockchip: Add RV1106 compatible
  pinctrl: rockchip: Decode drive strength in the get function
  pinctrl: fix PINCTRL_GENERIC_MUX not always being selectable
  pinctrl: airoha: add support of an7563 SoC
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: airoha: add support of an7563 pin controller
  pinctrl: airoha: try to find chip scu node by phandle first
  pinctrl: airoha: add support of en7523 SoC
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: airoha: add support of en7523 pin controller
  pinctrl: airoha: an7583: add support for olt pinmux
  pinctrl: airoha: an7583: add support for pon_alt pinmux
  pinctrl: airoha: an7583: add support for npu_uart pinmux
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: airoha: an7583: add missed features
  ...

1 files changed, 265 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/map_hash.rst b/Documentation/bpf/map_hash.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8606bf958
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/map_hash.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+.. Copyright (C) 2022 Red Hat, Inc.
+.. Copyright (C) 2022-2023 Isovalent, Inc.
+
+===============================================
+BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, with PERCPU and LRU Variants
+===============================================
+
+.. note::
+   - ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH`` was introduced in kernel version 3.19
+   - ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH`` was introduced in version 4.6
+   - Both ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH`` and ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH``
+     were introduced in version 4.10
+
+``BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH`` and ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH`` provide general
+purpose hash map storage. Both the key and the value can be structs,
+allowing for composite keys and values.
+
+The kernel is responsible for allocating and freeing key/value pairs, up
+to the max_entries limit that you specify. Hash maps use pre-allocation
+of hash table elements by default. The ``BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC`` flag can be
+used to disable pre-allocation when it is too memory expensive.
+
+``BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH`` provides a separate value slot per
+CPU. The per-cpu values are stored internally in an array.
+
+The ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH`` and ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH``
+variants add LRU semantics to their respective hash tables. An LRU hash
+will automatically evict the least recently used entries when the hash
+table reaches capacity. An LRU hash maintains an internal LRU list that
+is used to select elements for eviction. This internal LRU list is
+shared across CPUs but it is possible to request a per CPU LRU list with
+the ``BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU`` flag when calling ``bpf_map_create``.  The
+following table outlines the properties of LRU maps depending on the a
+map type and the flags used to create the map.
+
+======================== ========================= ================================
+Flag                     ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH`` ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH``
+======================== ========================= ================================
+**BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU**  Per-CPU LRU, global map   Per-CPU LRU, per-cpu map
+**!BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU** Global LRU, global map    Global LRU, per-cpu map
+======================== ========================= ================================
+
+Usage
+=====
+
+Kernel BPF
+----------
+
+bpf_map_update_elem()
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+   long bpf_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, const void *key, const void *value, u64 flags)
+
+Hash entries can be added or updated using the ``bpf_map_update_elem()``
+helper. This helper replaces existing elements atomically. The ``flags``
+parameter can be used to control the update behaviour:
+
+- ``BPF_ANY`` will create a new element or update an existing element
+- ``BPF_NOEXIST`` will create a new element only if one did not already
+  exist
+- ``BPF_EXIST`` will update an existing element
+
+``bpf_map_update_elem()`` returns 0 on success, or negative error in
+case of failure.
+
+bpf_map_lookup_elem()
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+   void *bpf_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, const void *key)
+
+Hash entries can be retrieved using the ``bpf_map_lookup_elem()``
+helper. This helper returns a pointer to the value associated with
+``key``, or ``NULL`` if no entry was found.
+
+bpf_map_delete_elem()
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+   long bpf_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, const void *key)
+
+Hash entries can be deleted using the ``bpf_map_delete_elem()``
+helper. This helper will return 0 on success, or negative error in case
+of failure.
+
+Per CPU Hashes
+--------------
+
+For ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH`` and ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH``
+the ``bpf_map_update_elem()`` and ``bpf_map_lookup_elem()`` helpers
+automatically access the hash slot for the current CPU.
+
+bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem()
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+   void *bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(struct bpf_map *map, const void *key, u32 cpu)
+
+The ``bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem()`` helper can be used to lookup the
+value in the hash slot for a specific CPU. Returns value associated with
+``key`` on ``cpu`` , or ``NULL`` if no entry was found or ``cpu`` is
+invalid.
+
+Concurrency
+-----------
+
+Values stored in ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH`` can be accessed concurrently by
+programs running on different CPUs.  Since Kernel version 5.1, the BPF
+infrastructure provides ``struct bpf_spin_lock`` to synchronise access.
+See ``tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_spin_lock.c``.
+
+Userspace
+---------
+
+bpf_map_get_next_key()
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+   int bpf_map_get_next_key(int fd, const void *cur_key, void *next_key)
+
+In userspace, it is possible to iterate through the keys of a hash using
+libbpf's ``bpf_map_get_next_key()`` function. The first key can be fetched by
+calling ``bpf_map_get_next_key()`` with ``cur_key`` set to
+``NULL``. Subsequent calls will fetch the next key that follows the
+current key. ``bpf_map_get_next_key()`` returns 0 on success, -ENOENT if
+cur_key is the last key in the hash, or negative error in case of
+failure.
+
+Note that if ``cur_key`` gets deleted then ``bpf_map_get_next_key()``
+will instead return the *first* key in the hash table which is
+undesirable. It is recommended to use batched lookup if there is going
+to be key deletion intermixed with ``bpf_map_get_next_key()``.
+
+Examples
+========
+
+Please see the ``tools/testing/selftests/bpf`` directory for functional
+examples.  The code snippets below demonstrates API usage.
+
+This example shows how to declare an LRU Hash with a struct key and a
+struct value.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+    #include <linux/bpf.h>
+    #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+    struct key {
+        __u32 srcip;
+    };
+
+    struct value {
+        __u64 packets;
+        __u64 bytes;
+    };
+
+    struct {
+            __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH);
+            __uint(max_entries, 32);
+            __type(key, struct key);
+            __type(value, struct value);
+    } packet_stats SEC(".maps");
+
+This example shows how to create or update hash values using atomic
+instructions:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+    static void update_stats(__u32 srcip, int bytes)
+    {
+            struct key key = {
+                    .srcip = srcip,
+            };
+            struct value *value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&packet_stats, &key);
+
+            if (value) {
+                    __sync_fetch_and_add(&value->packets, 1);
+                    __sync_fetch_and_add(&value->bytes, bytes);
+            } else {
+                    struct value newval = { 1, bytes };
+
+                    bpf_map_update_elem(&packet_stats, &key, &newval, BPF_NOEXIST);
+            }
+    }
+
+Userspace walking the map elements from the map declared above:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+    #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
+    #include <bpf/bpf.h>
+
+    static void walk_hash_elements(int map_fd)
+    {
+            struct key *cur_key = NULL;
+            struct key next_key;
+            struct value value;
+            int err;
+
+            for (;;) {
+                    err = bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, cur_key, &next_key);
+                    if (err)
+                            break;
+
+                    bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &next_key, &value);
+
+                    // Use key and value here
+
+                    cur_key = &next_key;
+            }
+    }
+
+Internals
+=========
+
+This section of the document is targeted at Linux developers and describes
+aspects of the map implementations that are not considered stable ABI. The
+following details are subject to change in future versions of the kernel.
+
+``BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH`` and variants
+--------------------------------------
+
+Updating elements in LRU maps may trigger eviction behaviour when the capacity
+of the map is reached. There are various steps that the update algorithm
+attempts in order to enforce the LRU property which have increasing impacts on
+other CPUs involved in the following operation attempts:
+
+- Attempt to use CPU-local state to batch operations
+- Attempt to fetch ``target_free`` free nodes from global lists
+- Attempt to pull any node from a global list and remove it from the hashmap
+- Attempt to pull any node from any CPU's list and remove it from the hashmap
+
+The number of nodes to borrow from the global list in a batch, ``target_free``,
+depends on the size of the map. Larger batch size reduces lock contention, but
+may also exhaust the global structure. The value is computed at map init to
+avoid exhaustion, by limiting aggregate reservation by all CPUs to half the map
+size. With a minimum of a single element and maximum budget of 128 at a time.
+
+This algorithm is described visually in the following diagram. See the
+description in commit 3a08c2fd7634 ("bpf: LRU List") for a full explanation of
+the corresponding operations:
+
+.. kernel-figure::  map_lru_hash_update.dot
+   :alt:    Diagram outlining the LRU eviction steps taken during map update.
+
+   LRU hash eviction during map update for ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH`` and
+   variants. See the dot file source for kernel function name code references.
+
+Map updates start from the oval in the top right "begin ``bpf_map_update()``"
+and progress through the graph towards the bottom where the result may be
+either a successful update or a failure with various error codes. The key in
+the top right provides indicators for which locks may be involved in specific
+operations. This is intended as a visual hint for reasoning about how map
+contention may impact update operations, though the map type and flags may
+impact the actual contention on those locks, based on the logic described in
+the table above. For instance, if the map is created with type
+``BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH`` and flags ``BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU`` then all map
+properties would be per-cpu.