diff options
| author | Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org> | 2026-06-30 18:05:56 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> | 2026-08-05 16:48:11 +0100 |
| commit | bb3b2cfeb206f5b10b859e134651b54120e3f530 (patch) | |
| tree | 6717fcea088ba5c5f15002a48101fa2537135bf2 /Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt | |
| download | linux-stable-bb3b2cfeb206f5b10b859e134651b54120e3f530.tar.gz linux-stable-bb3b2cfeb206f5b10b859e134651b54120e3f530.zip | |
ARM: 9480/1: entry: expand comment in __switch_tografted
As per discussion between the developers in the mail thread
linked, expand the comment in __switch_to so that readers
of the code understand what is going on.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt | 69 |
1 files changed, 69 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt b/Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000..edea4656c --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/atomic_bitops.txt @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +============= +Atomic bitops +============= + +While our bitmap_{}() functions are non-atomic, we have a number of operations +operating on single bits in a bitmap that are atomic. + + +API +--- + +The single bit operations are: + +Non-RMW ops: + + test_bit() + +RMW atomic operations without return value: + + {set,clear,change}_bit() + clear_bit_unlock() + +RMW atomic operations with return value: + + test_and_{set,clear,change}_bit() + test_and_set_bit_lock() + +Barriers: + + smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic() + + +All RMW atomic operations have a '__' prefixed variant which is non-atomic. + + +SEMANTICS +--------- + +Non-atomic ops: + +In particular __clear_bit_unlock() suffers the same issue as atomic_set(), +which is why the generic version maps to clear_bit_unlock(), see atomic_t.txt. + + +RMW ops: + +The test_and_{}_bit() operations return the original value of the bit. + + +ORDERING +-------- + +Like with atomic_t, the rule of thumb is: + + - non-RMW operations are unordered; + + - RMW operations that have no return value are unordered; + + - RMW operations that have a return value are fully ordered. + + - RMW operations that are conditional are fully ordered. + +Except for a successful test_and_set_bit_lock() which has ACQUIRE semantics, +clear_bit_unlock() which has RELEASE semantics and test_bit_acquire which has +ACQUIRE semantics. + +Since a platform only has a single means of achieving atomic operations +the same barriers as for atomic_t are used, see atomic_t.txt. + |
