kbuild: rust: keep Rust objects out of Clang LTO with inline helpersgrafted

Under `CONFIG_LTO_CLANG` + `CONFIG_RUST_INLINE_HELPERS`, one may hit
`objtool` errors such as:

    vmlinux.o: error: objtool: _R..._3Gsp4boot+0xd6a:
    can't find jump dest instruction at .text._R..._3Gsp4boot+0x1dfd

The reason is that in such builds, the Clang invocation that compiles
the combined Rust plus helpers bitcode emits LLVM bitcode (again) --
the final code generation happens in the linker's LTO step, which the
`-mllvm` trap options passed to Clang do not reach.

This, in turn, means that unreachable traps are missing, and the
impossible paths do not merely fallthrough to the next symbol, but past
the end of their own section, since LTO builds place each function in
its own section.

Thus filter `CC_FLAGS_LTO` out of the Clang invocation, so that it always
emits machine code directly, with the traps in place.

Assisted-by: LLM
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@google.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3a2486cc1da5 ("kbuild: rust: provide an option to inline C helpers into Rust")
Acked-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260816133233.197500-2-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 117 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cpu-load.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cpu-load.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..21a984337
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cpu-load.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+========
+CPU load
+========
+
+Linux exports various bits of information via ``/proc/stat`` and
+``/proc/uptime`` that userland tools, such as top(1), use to calculate
+the average time system spent in a particular state, for example::
+
+    $ iostat
+    Linux 2.6.18.3-exp (linmac)     02/20/2007
+
+    avg-cpu:  %user   %nice %system %iowait  %steal   %idle
+              10.01    0.00    2.92    5.44    0.00   81.63
+
+    ...
+
+Here the system thinks that over the default sampling period the
+system spent 10.01% of the time doing work in user space, 2.92% in the
+kernel, and was overall 81.63% of the time idle.
+
+In most cases the ``/proc/stat``	 information reflects the reality quite
+closely, however due to the nature of how/when the kernel collects
+this data sometimes it can not be trusted at all.
+
+So how is this information collected?  Whenever timer interrupt is
+signalled the kernel looks what kind of task was running at this
+moment and increments the counter that corresponds to this tasks
+kind/state.  The problem with this is that the system could have
+switched between various states multiple times between two timer
+interrupts yet the counter is incremented only for the last state.
+
+
+Example
+-------
+
+If we imagine the system with one task that periodically burns cycles
+in the following manner::
+
+     time line between two timer interrupts
+    |--------------------------------------|
+     ^                                    ^
+     |_ something begins working          |
+                                          |_ something goes to sleep
+                                         (only to be awaken quite soon)
+
+In the above situation the system will be 0% loaded according to the
+``/proc/stat`` (since the timer interrupt will always happen when the
+system is executing the idle handler), but in reality the load is
+closer to 99%.
+
+One can imagine many more situations where this behavior of the kernel
+will lead to quite erratic information inside ``/proc/stat``::
+
+
+	/* gcc -o hog smallhog.c */
+	#include <time.h>
+	#include <limits.h>
+	#include <signal.h>
+	#include <sys/time.h>
+	#define HIST 10
+
+	static volatile sig_atomic_t stop;
+
+	static void sighandler(int signr)
+	{
+		(void) signr;
+		stop = 1;
+	}
+
+	static unsigned long hog (unsigned long niters)
+	{
+		stop = 0;
+		while (!stop && --niters);
+		return niters;
+	}
+
+	int main (void)
+	{
+		int i;
+		struct itimerval it = {
+			.it_interval = { .tv_sec = 0, .tv_usec = 1 },
+			.it_value    = { .tv_sec = 0, .tv_usec = 1 } };
+		sigset_t set;
+		unsigned long v[HIST];
+		double tmp = 0.0;
+		unsigned long n;
+		signal(SIGALRM, &sighandler);
+		setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, &it, NULL);
+
+		hog (ULONG_MAX);
+		for (i = 0; i < HIST; ++i) v[i] = ULONG_MAX - hog(ULONG_MAX);
+		for (i = 0; i < HIST; ++i) tmp += v[i];
+		tmp /= HIST;
+		n = tmp - (tmp / 3.0);
+
+		sigemptyset(&set);
+		sigaddset(&set, SIGALRM);
+
+		for (;;) {
+			hog(n);
+			sigwait(&set, &i);
+		}
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+
+References
+----------
+
+- https://lore.kernel.org/r/loom.20070212T063225-663@post.gmane.org
+- Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst (1.8)
+
+
+Thanks
+------
+
+Con Kolivas, Pavel Machek