diff options
| author | Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> | 2026-08-31 14:43:51 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> | 2026-09-13 18:17:31 -0700 |
| commit | 55fc280e951ab2b39f3dcb640edc1b1eebc6d173 (patch) | |
| tree | f0b5f37b42fc13b9908a31b657c646b024231cdd /Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/Yama.rst | |
| download | linux-stable-55fc280e951ab2b39f3dcb640edc1b1eebc6d173.tar.gz linux-stable-55fc280e951ab2b39f3dcb640edc1b1eebc6d173.zip | |
Input: tsc2007 - read "ti,poll-period" as u32grafted
The "ti,poll-period" property is documented as a normal uint32 cell.
The driver used a u64 helper, which makes the helper type disagree with
the schema even though the stored value is still small.
Read "ti,poll-period" with the u32 helper matching the documented DT
cell size.
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5-5
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260831194352.1185860-1-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/Yama.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/Yama.rst | 75 |
1 files changed, 75 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/Yama.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/Yama.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d9cd937eb --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/Yama.rst @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +==== +Yama +==== + +Yama is a Linux Security Module that collects system-wide DAC security +protections that are not handled by the core kernel itself. This is +selectable at build-time with ``CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA``, and can be controlled +at run-time through sysctls in ``/proc/sys/kernel/yama``: + +ptrace_scope +============ + +As Linux grows in popularity, it will become a larger target for +malware. One particularly troubling weakness of the Linux process +interfaces is that a single user is able to examine the memory and +running state of any of their processes. For example, if one application +(e.g. Pidgin) was compromised, it would be possible for an attacker to +attach to other running processes (e.g. Firefox, SSH sessions, GPG agent, +etc) to extract additional credentials and continue to expand the scope +of their attack without resorting to user-assisted phishing. + +This is not a theoretical problem. `SSH session hijacking +<https://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-usa-05/bh-us-05-boileau.pdf>`_ +and `arbitrary code injection +<https://c-skills.blogspot.com/2007/05/injectso.html>`_ attacks already +exist and remain possible if ptrace is allowed to operate as before. +Since ptrace is not commonly used by non-developers and non-admins, system +builders should be allowed the option to disable this debugging system. + +For a solution, some applications use ``prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE, ...)`` to +specifically disallow such ptrace attachment (e.g. ssh-agent), but many +do not. A more general solution is to only allow ptrace directly from a +parent to a child process (i.e. direct "gdb EXE" and "strace EXE" still +work), or with ``CAP_SYS_PTRACE`` (i.e. "gdb --pid=PID", and "strace -p PID" +still work as root). + +In mode 1, software that has defined application-specific relationships +between a debugging process and its inferior (crash handlers, etc), +``prctl(PR_SET_PTRACER, pid, ...)`` can be used. An inferior can declare which +other process (and its descendants) are allowed to call ``PTRACE_ATTACH`` +against it. Only one such declared debugging process can exists for +each inferior at a time. For example, this is used by KDE, Chromium, and +Firefox's crash handlers, and by Wine for allowing only Wine processes +to ptrace each other. If a process wishes to entirely disable these ptrace +restrictions, it can call ``prctl(PR_SET_PTRACER, PR_SET_PTRACER_ANY, ...)`` +so that any otherwise allowed process (even those in external pid namespaces) +may attach. + +The sysctl settings (writable only with ``CAP_SYS_PTRACE``) are: + +0 - classic ptrace permissions: + a process can ``PTRACE_ATTACH`` to any other + process running under the same uid, as long as it is dumpable (i.e. + did not transition uids, start privileged, or have called + ``prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE...)`` already). Similarly, ``PTRACE_TRACEME`` is + unchanged. + +1 - restricted ptrace: + a process must have a predefined relationship + with the inferior it wants to call ``PTRACE_ATTACH`` on. By default, + this relationship is that of only its descendants when the above + classic criteria is also met. To change the relationship, an + inferior can call ``prctl(PR_SET_PTRACER, debugger, ...)`` to declare + an allowed debugger PID to call ``PTRACE_ATTACH`` on the inferior. + Using ``PTRACE_TRACEME`` is unchanged. + +2 - admin-only attach: + only processes with ``CAP_SYS_PTRACE`` may use ptrace, either with + ``PTRACE_ATTACH`` or through children calling ``PTRACE_TRACEME``. + +3 - no attach: + no processes may use ptrace with ``PTRACE_ATTACH`` nor via + ``PTRACE_TRACEME``. Once set, this sysctl value cannot be changed. + +The original children-only logic was based on the restrictions in grsecurity. |
