From 7e61560628d17ea6b1d8ee370f6d42694cff8758 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ulises Mendez Martinez Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 15:07:09 +0000 Subject: objtool: Validate disassembler headers in libopcodes probe commit 3f2de814c059 ("objtool: Fix libopcodes linking with static libraries") tested for libopcodes availability by linking a test snippet with a forward declaration of disassemble_init_for_target(). However, testing symbol linkage with an extern declaration only verifies the presence of the library (.so/.a) and bypasses checking for development headers (binutils-dev). On systems where libopcodes is present without development headers installed, the probe succeeds, enabling BUILD_DISAS. Subsequent compilation of objtool then fails: fatal error: 'bfd.h' file not found 113 | #include Additionally, the probe invokes $(HOSTCC) without $(HOSTCFLAGS), ignoring any sysroot or include flags specified for the host compiler. Fix this by including and directly in the test snippet, passing $(HOSTCFLAGS) so host compiler options are respected, and defining PACKAGE="objtool" to satisfy the configuration check in . Fixes: 3f2de814c059 ("objtool: Fix libopcodes linking with static libraries") Fixes: 436326bc525d ("objtool: fix build failure due to missing libopcodes check") Reported-by: Alice Ryhl Assisted-by: Antigravity:Gemini-Next Signed-off-by: Ulises Mendez Martinez Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260904150710.2997558-1-umendez@google.com Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf --- samples/check-exec/set-exec.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+) create mode 100644 samples/check-exec/set-exec.c (limited to 'samples/check-exec/set-exec.c') diff --git a/samples/check-exec/set-exec.c b/samples/check-exec/set-exec.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ba86a60a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/samples/check-exec/set-exec.c @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause +/* + * Simple tool to set SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE, SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE, + * before executing a command. + * + * Copyright © 2024 Microsoft Corporation + */ + +#define _GNU_SOURCE +#define __SANE_USERSPACE_TYPES__ +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +static void print_usage(const char *argv0) +{ + fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s -f|-i -- [args]...\n\n", argv0); + fprintf(stderr, "Execute a command with\n"); + fprintf(stderr, "- SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE set: -f\n"); + fprintf(stderr, "- SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE set: -i\n"); +} + +int main(const int argc, char *const argv[], char *const *const envp) +{ + const char *cmd_path; + char *const *cmd_argv; + int opt, secbits_cur, secbits_new; + bool has_policy = false; + + secbits_cur = prctl(PR_GET_SECUREBITS); + if (secbits_cur == -1) { + /* + * This should never happen, except with a buggy seccomp + * filter. + */ + perror("ERROR: Failed to get securebits"); + return 1; + } + + secbits_new = secbits_cur; + while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "fi")) != -1) { + switch (opt) { + case 'f': + secbits_new |= SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE | + SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE_LOCKED; + has_policy = true; + break; + case 'i': + secbits_new |= SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE | + SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE_LOCKED; + has_policy = true; + break; + default: + print_usage(argv[0]); + return 1; + } + } + + if (!argv[optind] || !has_policy) { + print_usage(argv[0]); + return 1; + } + + if (secbits_cur != secbits_new && + prctl(PR_SET_SECUREBITS, secbits_new)) { + perror("Failed to set secure bit(s)."); + fprintf(stderr, + "Hint: The running kernel may not support this feature.\n"); + return 1; + } + + cmd_path = argv[optind]; + cmd_argv = argv + optind; + fprintf(stderr, "Executing command...\n"); + execvpe(cmd_path, cmd_argv, envp); + fprintf(stderr, "Failed to execute \"%s\": %s\n", cmd_path, + strerror(errno)); + return 1; +} -- cgit v1.3.1