From 506ada89629ec7059b96ecfb0dc7d33ece0103ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eduard Zingerman Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 17:05:56 -0700 Subject: bpf: mark a NULL kfunc argument precise check_kfunc_arg() allows bpf_register_is_null() for nullable arguments w/o marking the underlying scalar register precise. Hence a checkpoint created on such a path would prune against arbitrary scalar value. Fixes: 3bda08b63670 ("bpf: Allow NULL buffers in bpf_dynptr_slice(_rw)") Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260904-register-is-null-precise-fixes-v1-5-0f5a360ff15d@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- net/wireless/tests/util.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) create mode 100644 net/wireless/tests/util.c (limited to 'net/wireless/tests/util.c') diff --git a/net/wireless/tests/util.c b/net/wireless/tests/util.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..118f7fb42 --- /dev/null +++ b/net/wireless/tests/util.c @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * KUnit fixture to have a (configurable) wiphy + * + * Copyright (C) 2023 Intel Corporation + */ +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include "util.h" + +int t_wiphy_init(struct kunit_resource *resource, void *ctx) +{ + struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test(); + struct cfg80211_ops *ops; + struct wiphy *wiphy; + struct t_wiphy_priv *priv; + + ops = kzalloc_obj(*ops); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ops); + + wiphy = wiphy_new_nm(ops, sizeof(*priv), "kunit"); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, wiphy); + + priv = wiphy_priv(wiphy); + priv->ctx = ctx; + priv->ops = ops; + + /* Initialize channels, feel free to add more here channels/bands */ + memcpy(priv->channels_2ghz, channels_2ghz, sizeof(channels_2ghz)); + wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_2GHZ] = &priv->band_2ghz; + priv->band_2ghz.channels = priv->channels_2ghz; + priv->band_2ghz.n_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(channels_2ghz); + + resource->data = wiphy; + resource->name = "wiphy"; + + return 0; +} + +void t_wiphy_exit(struct kunit_resource *resource) +{ + struct t_wiphy_priv *priv; + struct cfg80211_ops *ops; + + priv = wiphy_priv(resource->data); + ops = priv->ops; + + /* Should we ensure anything about the state here? + * e.g. full destruction or no calls to any ops on destruction? + */ + + wiphy_free(resource->data); + kfree(ops); +} -- cgit v1.3.1