From 3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kees Cook Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 15:31:14 -0700 Subject: treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversions This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc() family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's "--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control flow indicator I could find. Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc, riscv, and s390 with no new warnings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1] Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook --- net/wireless/tests/util.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) create mode 100644 net/wireless/tests/util.c (limited to 'net/wireless/tests/util.c') diff --git a/net/wireless/tests/util.c b/net/wireless/tests/util.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..118f7fb42 --- /dev/null +++ b/net/wireless/tests/util.c @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * KUnit fixture to have a (configurable) wiphy + * + * Copyright (C) 2023 Intel Corporation + */ +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include "util.h" + +int t_wiphy_init(struct kunit_resource *resource, void *ctx) +{ + struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test(); + struct cfg80211_ops *ops; + struct wiphy *wiphy; + struct t_wiphy_priv *priv; + + ops = kzalloc_obj(*ops); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ops); + + wiphy = wiphy_new_nm(ops, sizeof(*priv), "kunit"); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, wiphy); + + priv = wiphy_priv(wiphy); + priv->ctx = ctx; + priv->ops = ops; + + /* Initialize channels, feel free to add more here channels/bands */ + memcpy(priv->channels_2ghz, channels_2ghz, sizeof(channels_2ghz)); + wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_2GHZ] = &priv->band_2ghz; + priv->band_2ghz.channels = priv->channels_2ghz; + priv->band_2ghz.n_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(channels_2ghz); + + resource->data = wiphy; + resource->name = "wiphy"; + + return 0; +} + +void t_wiphy_exit(struct kunit_resource *resource) +{ + struct t_wiphy_priv *priv; + struct cfg80211_ops *ops; + + priv = wiphy_priv(resource->data); + ops = priv->ops; + + /* Should we ensure anything about the state here? + * e.g. full destruction or no calls to any ops on destruction? + */ + + wiphy_free(resource->data); + kfree(ops); +} -- cgit v1.3.1