From 4617721c502b2ddaa4e324e86da4997edf738fa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 09:55:01 -0400 Subject: ftrace: Synchronize the initialization of ftrace_ops There's some internal state that ftrace_ops needs to have set, but since it can be declared outside of the ftrace.c code, it calls ftrace_ops_init() on the ops in every global function. The issue is that if two tasks call it on the same ops at the same time it is possible to have the initialization of one corrupt the initialization of the other call. Create a ops_mutex to use to synchronize every initialization of the ftrace_ops. The mutex is taken within checking the ftrace_ops flag that states it was initializied but the flag is checked again after the mutex has been taken. Checking first outside the mutex allows it to shortcut having to take the mutex. But then the check needs to be done again after the mute is taken in case of races. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260902095501.6b59af20@gandalf.local.home Fixes: f04f24fb7e48d ("ftrace, kprobes: Fix a deadlock on ftrace_regex_lock") Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Close: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260829025528.49A831F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- net/sched/em_cmp.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+) create mode 100644 net/sched/em_cmp.c (limited to 'net/sched/em_cmp.c') diff --git a/net/sched/em_cmp.c b/net/sched/em_cmp.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..48c1bce74 --- /dev/null +++ b/net/sched/em_cmp.c @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later +/* + * net/sched/em_cmp.c Simple packet data comparison ematch + * + * Authors: Thomas Graf + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +static inline int cmp_needs_transformation(struct tcf_em_cmp *cmp) +{ + return unlikely(cmp->flags & TCF_EM_CMP_TRANS); +} + +static int em_cmp_match(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcf_ematch *em, + struct tcf_pkt_info *info) +{ + struct tcf_em_cmp *cmp = (struct tcf_em_cmp *) em->data; + unsigned char *ptr = tcf_get_base_ptr(skb, cmp->layer); + u32 val = 0; + + if (!ptr) + return 0; + ptr += cmp->off; + if (!tcf_valid_offset(skb, ptr, cmp->align)) + return 0; + + switch (cmp->align) { + case TCF_EM_ALIGN_U8: + val = *ptr; + break; + + case TCF_EM_ALIGN_U16: + val = get_unaligned_be16(ptr); + + if (cmp_needs_transformation(cmp)) + val = be16_to_cpu(val); + break; + + case TCF_EM_ALIGN_U32: + /* Worth checking boundaries? The branching seems + * to get worse. Visit again. + */ + val = get_unaligned_be32(ptr); + + if (cmp_needs_transformation(cmp)) + val = be32_to_cpu(val); + break; + + default: + return 0; + } + + if (cmp->mask) + val &= cmp->mask; + + switch (cmp->opnd) { + case TCF_EM_OPND_EQ: + return val == cmp->val; + case TCF_EM_OPND_LT: + return val < cmp->val; + case TCF_EM_OPND_GT: + return val > cmp->val; + } + + return 0; +} + +static struct tcf_ematch_ops em_cmp_ops = { + .kind = TCF_EM_CMP, + .datalen = sizeof(struct tcf_em_cmp), + .match = em_cmp_match, + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .link = LIST_HEAD_INIT(em_cmp_ops.link) +}; + +static int __init init_em_cmp(void) +{ + return tcf_em_register(&em_cmp_ops); +} + +static void __exit exit_em_cmp(void) +{ + tcf_em_unregister(&em_cmp_ops); +} + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ematch classifier for basic data types(8/16/32 bit) against skb data"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); + +module_init(init_em_cmp); +module_exit(exit_em_cmp); + +MODULE_ALIAS_TCF_EMATCH(TCF_EM_CMP); -- cgit v1.3.1