From 106b4a2a78b2a2f14885604891957b84bba502db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adrian Betschart Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:13:14 +0200 Subject: drm/amd/display: Try RGB before YCbCr 4:4:4 in stream validation amdgpu_dm_create_validate_stream_for_sink() walks encoding_order[] and uses the first encoding that validates. YCbCr 4:4:4 is listed before RGB, so an HDMI sink that advertises 4:4:4 gets YCbCr 4:4:4 whenever the "color format" property is left at AUTO, even though RGB fits the same link. That contradicts the documented AUTO behaviour for HDMI in enum drm_connector_color_format (RGB, falling back to YCbCr 4:2:0 only when the bandwidth is not available or the mode is 4:2:0-only), which the amdgpu implementation of the property also describes. It also leaves the "Broadcast RGB" property without effect on such sinks, since the quantization range it selects only applies to RGB output. Try RGB first. The mask still holds every encoding the sink supports, so a mode that cannot carry RGB falls back exactly as before. For reference, v7.2 picked RGB here unless YCbCr 4:4:4 was forced through debugfs, while earlier kernels picked YCbCr 4:4:4 for any HDMI sink that advertised it. Fixes: 0b0ff65d3ca1 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor stream validation") Suggested-by: Adolfo Rodrigues Assisted-by: Claude Code:claude-fable-5-1 Signed-off-by: Adrian Betschart Reviewed-by: Fangzhi Zuo Tested-by: Adolfo Rodrigues Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher (cherry picked from commit 7de432bc753133764dc40d37f9388da56de251e7) --- lib/tests/hashtable_test.c | 318 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 318 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/tests/hashtable_test.c (limited to 'lib/tests/hashtable_test.c') diff --git a/lib/tests/hashtable_test.c b/lib/tests/hashtable_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3521de6ba --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/tests/hashtable_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,318 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit test for the Kernel Hashtable structures. + * + * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC. + * Author: Rae Moar + */ +#include + +#include + +struct hashtable_test_entry { + int key; + int data; + struct hlist_node node; + int visited; +}; + +static void hashtable_test_hash_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* Test the different ways of initialising a hashtable. */ + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash1, 2); + DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hash2, 3); + + /* When using DECLARE_HASHTABLE, must use hash_init to + * initialize the hashtable. + */ + hash_init(hash2); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash1)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash2)); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_empty(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry a; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 1); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash)); + + a.key = 1; + a.data = 13; + hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key); + + /* Hashtable should no longer be empty. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, hash_empty(hash)); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_hashed(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry a, b; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 4); + + a.key = 1; + a.data = 13; + hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key); + b.key = 1; + b.data = 2; + hash_add(hash, &b.node, b.key); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_hashed(&a.node)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_hashed(&b.node)); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_add(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry a, b, *x; + int bkt; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + a.key = 1; + a.data = 13; + a.visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key); + b.key = 2; + b.data = 10; + b.visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &b.node, b.key); + + hash_for_each(hash, bkt, x, node) { + x->visited++; + if (x->key == a.key) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, x->data, 13); + else if (x->key == b.key) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, x->data, 10); + else + KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Unexpected key in hashtable."); + } + + /* Both entries should have been visited exactly once. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, a.visited, 1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, b.visited, 1); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_del(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry a, b, *x; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 6); + + a.key = 1; + a.data = 13; + hash_add(hash, &a.node, a.key); + b.key = 2; + b.data = 10; + b.visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &b.node, b.key); + + hash_del(&b.node); + hash_for_each_possible(hash, x, node, b.key) { + x->visited++; + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, x->key, b.key); + } + + /* The deleted entry should not have been visited. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, b.visited, 0); + + hash_del(&a.node); + + /* The hashtable should be empty. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, hash_empty(hash)); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry entries[3]; + struct hashtable_test_entry *x; + int bkt, i, j, count; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + /* Add three entries to the hashtable. */ + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { + entries[i].key = i; + entries[i].data = i + 10; + entries[i].visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key); + } + + count = 0; + hash_for_each(hash, bkt, x, node) { + x->visited += 1; + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, x->key, 0, "Unexpected key in hashtable."); + KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, x->key, 3, "Unexpected key in hashtable."); + count++; + } + + /* Should have visited each entry exactly once. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3); + for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each_safe(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry entries[3]; + struct hashtable_test_entry *x; + struct hlist_node *tmp; + int bkt, i, j, count; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 3); + + /* Add three entries to the hashtable. */ + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { + entries[i].key = i; + entries[i].data = i + 10; + entries[i].visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key); + } + + count = 0; + hash_for_each_safe(hash, bkt, tmp, x, node) { + x->visited += 1; + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, x->key, 0, "Unexpected key in hashtable."); + KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, x->key, 3, "Unexpected key in hashtable."); + count++; + + /* Delete entry during loop. */ + hash_del(&x->node); + } + + /* Should have visited each entry exactly once. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3); + for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1); +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry entries[4]; + struct hashtable_test_entry *x, *y; + int buckets[2]; + int bkt, i, j, count; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 5); + + /* Add three entries with key = 0 to the hashtable. */ + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { + entries[i].key = 0; + entries[i].data = i; + entries[i].visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key); + } + + /* Add an entry with key = 1. */ + entries[3].key = 1; + entries[3].data = 3; + entries[3].visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[3].node, entries[3].key); + + count = 0; + hash_for_each_possible(hash, x, node, 0) { + x->visited += 1; + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, x->data, 0, "Unexpected data in hashtable."); + KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, x->data, 4, "Unexpected data in hashtable."); + count++; + } + + /* Should have visited each entry with key = 0 exactly once. */ + for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1); + + /* Save the buckets for the different keys. */ + hash_for_each(hash, bkt, y, node) { + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, y->key, 0, "Unexpected key in hashtable."); + KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG(test, y->key, 1, "Unexpected key in hashtable."); + buckets[y->key] = bkt; + } + + /* If entry with key = 1 is in the same bucket as the entries with + * key = 0, check it was visited. Otherwise ensure that only three + * entries were visited. + */ + if (buckets[0] == buckets[1]) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 4); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 1); + } else { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 0); + } +} + +static void hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible_safe(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct hashtable_test_entry entries[4]; + struct hashtable_test_entry *x, *y; + struct hlist_node *tmp; + int buckets[2]; + int bkt, i, j, count; + DEFINE_HASHTABLE(hash, 5); + + /* Add three entries with key = 0 to the hashtable. */ + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) { + entries[i].key = 0; + entries[i].data = i; + entries[i].visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[i].node, entries[i].key); + } + + /* Add an entry with key = 1. */ + entries[3].key = 1; + entries[3].data = 3; + entries[3].visited = 0; + hash_add(hash, &entries[3].node, entries[3].key); + + count = 0; + hash_for_each_possible_safe(hash, x, tmp, node, 0) { + x->visited += 1; + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, x->data, 0, "Unexpected data in hashtable."); + KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, x->data, 4, "Unexpected data in hashtable."); + count++; + + /* Delete entry during loop. */ + hash_del(&x->node); + } + + /* Should have visited each entry with key = 0 exactly once. */ + for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[j].visited, 1); + + /* Save the buckets for the different keys. */ + hash_for_each(hash, bkt, y, node) { + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, y->key, 0, "Unexpected key in hashtable."); + KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG(test, y->key, 1, "Unexpected key in hashtable."); + buckets[y->key] = bkt; + } + + /* If entry with key = 1 is in the same bucket as the entries with + * key = 0, check it was visited. Otherwise ensure that only three + * entries were visited. + */ + if (buckets[0] == buckets[1]) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 4); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 1); + } else { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, entries[3].visited, 0); + } +} + +static struct kunit_case hashtable_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_init), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_empty), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_hashed), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_add), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_del), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each_safe), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible), + KUNIT_CASE(hashtable_test_hash_for_each_possible_safe), + {}, +}; + +static struct kunit_suite hashtable_test_module = { + .name = "hashtable", + .test_cases = hashtable_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suites(&hashtable_test_module); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KUnit test for the Kernel Hashtable structures"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); -- cgit v1.3.1