From a5f7a5bb3b7f28ba7e4fa246775b29a0e5537255 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jinke Han Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 15:37:42 +0800 Subject: x86/kprobes: Fix crash when probing CS CALL instructions When using eBPF to probe CS CALL instructions within a function, a crash can be triggered. The eBPF tool probes offset 257 of the __hrtimer_run_queues() function: <__hrtimer_run_queues+249>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) <__hrtimer_run_queues+254>: mov %r14,%rdi <__hrtimer_run_queues+257>: cs call <__x86_indirect_thunk_r12> <__hrtimer_run_queues+263>: mov %eax,%r12d <__hrtimer_run_queues+266>: xchg %ax,%ax <__hrtimer_run_queues+268>: mov %r13,%rdi Which triggers this crash: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000f41c9 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: P RIP: 0010:__hrtimer_run_queues+0x106/0x230 Note that __hrtimer_run_queues+0x106 is __hrtimer_run_queues+262, which is at the 6th byte of the above CS CALL instruction. Since the CS CALL instruction occupies 6 bytes, the exception occurred in the middle of that call instruction. The root cause is that when using eBPF tools to probe in the middle of a function, a kprobe with INT3 is used as the underlying implementation. During single-step emulation of the original CALL instruction, int3_emulate_call() assumes that the probed CALL instruction is 5 bytes long. However, the actual CS-prefixed CALL instruction occupies 6 bytes, so it constructs an incorrect exception return address. When the CPU returns from the kprobe handler, the next instruction to be executed is at the address of the last byte of that CS CALL instruction. Coincidentally, starting from that address, the CPU fetches and decodes a completely different instruction, which ultimately triggers a kernel crash. Fix the issue by using the actual instruction length obtained from the instruction decoder when constructing the exception return address, rather than relying on the hardcoded CALL_INSN_SIZE macro. [ mingo: Refined the changelog ] Fixes: 6256e668b7af ("x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step") Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Signed-off-by: Jinke Han Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Acked-by: Yafang Shao Acked-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260908073742.GA10517@didi-ThinkCentre-M920t-N000 --- lib/kunit/bug.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/kunit/bug.c (limited to 'lib/kunit/bug.c') diff --git a/lib/kunit/bug.c b/lib/kunit/bug.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8579235c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/kunit/bug.c @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit helpers for backtrace suppression + * + * Copyright (C) 2025 Alessandro Carminati + * Copyright (C) 2024 Guenter Roeck + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "hooks-impl.h" + +struct kunit_suppressed_warning { + struct list_head node; + struct task_struct *task; + struct kunit *test; + atomic_t counter; +}; + +static LIST_HEAD(suppressed_warnings); +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(suppressed_warnings_lock); + +static void kunit_suppress_warning_remove(struct kunit_suppressed_warning *w) +{ + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&suppressed_warnings_lock, flags); + list_del_rcu(&w->node); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&suppressed_warnings_lock, flags); + put_task_struct(w->task); +} + +KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(kunit_suppress_warning_cleanup, + kunit_suppress_warning_remove, + struct kunit_suppressed_warning *); + +bool kunit_has_active_suppress_warning(void) +{ + return __kunit_is_suppressed_warning_impl(false); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_has_active_suppress_warning); + +struct kunit_suppressed_warning * +kunit_start_suppress_warning(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit_suppressed_warning *w; + unsigned long flags; + int ret; + + if (kunit_has_active_suppress_warning()) { + KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Another suppression block is already active"); + return NULL; + } + + w = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*w), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!w) { + KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to allocate suppression handle."); + return NULL; + } + + w->task = get_task_struct(current); + w->test = test; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&suppressed_warnings_lock, flags); + list_add_rcu(&w->node, &suppressed_warnings); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&suppressed_warnings_lock, flags); + + ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, + kunit_suppress_warning_cleanup, w); + if (ret) { + KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to add suppression cleanup action."); + return NULL; + } + + return w; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_start_suppress_warning); + +void kunit_end_suppress_warning(struct kunit *test, + struct kunit_suppressed_warning *w) +{ + if (!w) + return; + kunit_release_action(test, kunit_suppress_warning_cleanup, w); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_end_suppress_warning); + +void __kunit_suppress_auto_cleanup(struct kunit_suppressed_warning **wp) +{ + if (*wp) + kunit_end_suppress_warning((*wp)->test, *wp); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_suppress_auto_cleanup); + +int kunit_suppressed_warning_count(struct kunit_suppressed_warning *w) +{ + return w ? atomic_read(&w->counter) : 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suppressed_warning_count); + +bool __kunit_is_suppressed_warning_impl(bool count) +{ + struct kunit_suppressed_warning *w; + + guard(rcu)(); + list_for_each_entry_rcu(w, &suppressed_warnings, node) { + if (w->task == current) { + if (count) + atomic_inc(&w->counter); + return true; + } + } + + return false; +} -- cgit v1.3.1