From 4310c6b8e75d6a47f7548e5948fbe6318aa4440a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedor Pchelkin Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:58:09 +0300 Subject: thunderbolt: Fix NULL dereference in tb_remove_work() There is a slight race between tb_remove_work() and tb_domain_remove() which leads to dereferencing a NULL tb->root_switch pointer inside tb_free_unplugged_xdomains(): Thread A Thread B tb_remove_work() tb_domain_remove() mutex_lock(&tb->lock) tb_stop() /* doesn't cancel a running callback */ cancel_delayed_work(&tcm->remove_work) ... tb_switch_remove(tb->root_switch) tb->root_switch = NULL mutex_unlock(&tb->lock) mutex_lock(&tb->lock) ... /* without checking ->root_switch */ tb_free_unplugged_xdomains(tb->root_switch) mutex_unlock(&tb->lock) Commit a8937f35cf39 ("thunderbolt: Remove XDomain from the bus without holding tb->lock") doesn't seem right to move tb_free_unplugged_xdomains() out of the &tb->lock section and the check for tb->root_switch, in particular. It states: For this reason separate removing the XDomain from the topology data structures (where we need the lock) from unregistering the device from the bus (where remove callbacks of the drivers are being called). tb_free_unplugged_xdomains() belongs to the former group of functions requiring the lock. And it also calls tb_xdomain_remove() which should only be called with &tb->lock held. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace static analysis tool. Fixes: a8937f35cf39 ("thunderbolt: Remove XDomain from the bus without holding tb->lock") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg --- include/vdso/math64.h | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/vdso/math64.h (limited to 'include/vdso/math64.h') diff --git a/include/vdso/math64.h b/include/vdso/math64.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000..22ae212f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/vdso/math64.h @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __VDSO_MATH64_H +#define __VDSO_MATH64_H + +static __always_inline u32 +__iter_div_u64_rem(u64 dividend, u32 divisor, u64 *remainder) +{ + u32 ret = 0; + + while (dividend >= divisor) { + /* The following asm() prevents the compiler from + optimising this loop into a modulo operation. */ + asm("" : "+rm"(dividend)); + + dividend -= divisor; + ret++; + } + + *remainder = dividend; + + return ret; +} + +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128) && defined(__SIZEOF_INT128__) + +#ifndef mul_u64_u32_add_u64_shr +static __always_inline u64 mul_u64_u32_add_u64_shr(u64 a, u32 mul, u64 b, unsigned int shift) +{ + return (u64)((((unsigned __int128)a * mul) + b) >> shift); +} +#endif /* mul_u64_u32_add_u64_shr */ + +#else + +#ifndef mul_u64_u32_add_u64_shr +#ifndef mul_u32_u32 +static inline u64 mul_u32_u32(u32 a, u32 b) +{ + return (u64)a * b; +} +#define mul_u32_u32 mul_u32_u32 +#endif +static __always_inline u64 mul_u64_u32_add_u64_shr(u64 a, u32 mul, u64 b, unsigned int shift) +{ + u32 ah = a >> 32, al = a; + bool ovf; + u64 ret; + + ovf = __builtin_add_overflow(mul_u32_u32(al, mul), b, &ret); + ret >>= shift; + if (ovf && shift) + ret += 1ULL << (64 - shift); + if (ah) + ret += mul_u32_u32(ah, mul) << (32 - shift); + + return ret; +} +#endif /* mul_u64_u32_add_u64_shr */ + +#endif + +#endif /* __VDSO_MATH64_H */ -- cgit v1.3.1