From 4617721c502b2ddaa4e324e86da4997edf738fa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 09:55:01 -0400 Subject: ftrace: Synchronize the initialization of ftrace_ops There's some internal state that ftrace_ops needs to have set, but since it can be declared outside of the ftrace.c code, it calls ftrace_ops_init() on the ops in every global function. The issue is that if two tasks call it on the same ops at the same time it is possible to have the initialization of one corrupt the initialization of the other call. Create a ops_mutex to use to synchronize every initialization of the ftrace_ops. The mutex is taken within checking the ftrace_ops flag that states it was initializied but the flag is checked again after the mutex has been taken. Checking first outside the mutex allows it to shortcut having to take the mutex. But then the check needs to be done again after the mute is taken in case of races. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260902095501.6b59af20@gandalf.local.home Fixes: f04f24fb7e48d ("ftrace, kprobes: Fix a deadlock on ftrace_regex_lock") Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Close: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260829025528.49A831F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- fs/tests/exec_kunit.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+) create mode 100644 fs/tests/exec_kunit.c (limited to 'fs/tests/exec_kunit.c') diff --git a/fs/tests/exec_kunit.c b/fs/tests/exec_kunit.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1c32cac09 --- /dev/null +++ b/fs/tests/exec_kunit.c @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +#include + +struct bprm_stack_limits_result { + struct linux_binprm bprm; + int expected_rc; + unsigned long expected_argmin; +}; + +static const struct bprm_stack_limits_result bprm_stack_limits_results[] = { + /* Negative argc/envc counts produce -E2BIG */ + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ULONG_MAX, + .argc = INT_MIN, .envc = INT_MIN }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ULONG_MAX, + .argc = 5, .envc = -1 }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ULONG_MAX, + .argc = -1, .envc = 10 }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + /* The max value of argc or envc is MAX_ARG_STRINGS. */ + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ULONG_MAX, + .argc = INT_MAX, .envc = INT_MAX }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ULONG_MAX, + .argc = MAX_ARG_STRINGS, .envc = MAX_ARG_STRINGS }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ULONG_MAX, + .argc = 0, .envc = MAX_ARG_STRINGS }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ULONG_MAX, + .argc = MAX_ARG_STRINGS, .envc = 0 }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + /* + * On 32-bit system these argc and envc counts, while likely impossible + * to represent within the associated TASK_SIZE, could overflow the + * limit calculation, and bypass the ptr_size <= limit check. + */ + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ULONG_MAX, + .argc = 0x20000001, .envc = 0x20000001 }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU + /* Make sure a pathological bprm->p doesn't cause an overflow. */ + { { .p = sizeof(void *), .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ULONG_MAX, + .argc = 10, .envc = 10 }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, +#endif + /* + * 0 rlim_stack will get raised to ARG_MAX. With 1 string pointer, + * we should see p - ARG_MAX + sizeof(void *). + */ + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = 0, + .argc = 1, .envc = 0 }, .expected_argmin = ULONG_MAX - ARG_MAX + sizeof(void *)}, + /* Validate that argc is always raised to a minimum of 1. */ + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = 0, + .argc = 0, .envc = 0 }, .expected_argmin = ULONG_MAX - ARG_MAX + sizeof(void *)}, + /* + * 0 rlim_stack will get raised to ARG_MAX. With pointers filling ARG_MAX, + * we should see -E2BIG. (Note argc is always raised to at least 1.) + */ + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = 0, + .argc = ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *), .envc = 0 }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = 0, + .argc = 0, .envc = ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *) - 1 }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = 0, + .argc = ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *) + 1, .envc = 0 }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = 0, + .argc = 0, .envc = ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *) }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + /* And with one less, we see space for exactly 1 pointer. */ + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = 0, + .argc = (ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *)) - 1, .envc = 0 }, + .expected_argmin = ULONG_MAX - sizeof(void *) }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = 0, + .argc = 0, .envc = (ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *)) - 2, }, + .expected_argmin = ULONG_MAX - sizeof(void *) }, + /* If we raise rlim_stack / 4 to exactly ARG_MAX, nothing changes. */ + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ARG_MAX * 4, + .argc = ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *), .envc = 0 }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ARG_MAX * 4, + .argc = 0, .envc = ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *) - 1 }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ARG_MAX * 4, + .argc = ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *) + 1, .envc = 0 }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ARG_MAX * 4, + .argc = 0, .envc = ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *) }, .expected_rc = -E2BIG }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ARG_MAX * 4, + .argc = (ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *)) - 1, .envc = 0 }, + .expected_argmin = ULONG_MAX - sizeof(void *) }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = ARG_MAX * 4, + .argc = 0, .envc = (ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *)) - 2, }, + .expected_argmin = ULONG_MAX - sizeof(void *) }, + /* But raising it another pointer * 4 will provide space for 1 more pointer. */ + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = (ARG_MAX + sizeof(void *)) * 4, + .argc = ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *), .envc = 0 }, + .expected_argmin = ULONG_MAX - sizeof(void *) }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = (ARG_MAX + sizeof(void *)) * 4, + .argc = 0, .envc = ARG_MAX / sizeof(void *) - 1 }, + .expected_argmin = ULONG_MAX - sizeof(void *) }, + /* Raising rlim_stack / 4 to _STK_LIM / 4 * 3 will see more space. */ + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = 4 * (_STK_LIM / 4 * 3), + .argc = 0, .envc = 0 }, + .expected_argmin = ULONG_MAX - (_STK_LIM / 4 * 3) + sizeof(void *) }, + /* But raising it any further will see no increase. */ + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = 4 * (_STK_LIM / 4 * 3 + sizeof(void *)), + .argc = 0, .envc = 0 }, + .expected_argmin = ULONG_MAX - (_STK_LIM / 4 * 3) + sizeof(void *) }, + { { .p = ULONG_MAX, .rlim_stack.rlim_cur = 4 * _STK_LIM, + .argc = 0, .envc = 0 }, + .expected_argmin = ULONG_MAX - (_STK_LIM / 4 * 3) + sizeof(void *) }, +}; + +static void exec_test_bprm_stack_limits(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* Double-check the constants. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, _STK_LIM, SZ_8M); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ARG_MAX, 32 * SZ_4K); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, MAX_ARG_STRINGS, 0x7FFFFFFF); + + for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bprm_stack_limits_results); i++) { + const struct bprm_stack_limits_result *result = &bprm_stack_limits_results[i]; + struct linux_binprm bprm = result->bprm; + int rc; + + rc = bprm_stack_limits(&bprm); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, rc, result->expected_rc, "on loop %d", i); +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, bprm.argmin, result->expected_argmin, "on loop %d", i); +#endif + } +} + +static struct kunit_case exec_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(exec_test_bprm_stack_limits), + {}, +}; + +static struct kunit_suite exec_test_suite = { + .name = "exec", + .test_cases = exec_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suite(exec_test_suite); -- cgit v1.3.1