From 33a154a96e71a34a1bcca9f40da343dbbf7b38b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 14:52:55 +0000 Subject: selftests/bpf: Test packet range of pointers sharing an id Add tests where two packet pointers share an id and tightening one pointer's umax from its var_off would put it less than their constant distance from the other's umax: with an index & 0x38 capped at 50, the base pointer keeps umax 50, so the pointer 8 bytes further on must keep umax 58, even though its known bits allow at most 56. These refused a valid program or accepted an out-of-bounds access before the fix: - check the advanced copy, load through the base: valid, was refused; - check the base, load the byte at base + 1 through a copy advanced by 8: was accepted; - check base + 4, load 4 bytes at base + 2 through base + 8: reads two bytes past the checked range, was accepted; - the same as the second with data_meta pointers checked against data: was accepted. These pass with and without the fix and cover nearby paths: - subtract an unknown scalar from a checked pointer and load below it (the range is kept across a new id); - reach a load through two paths whose checks cover 8 and 7 bytes after the loaded pointer; the second path must not be pruned by the first; - spill a copy of a pointer, check the pointer, fill the copy and load one byte past the checked range: the load is refused, and the copy has the range of the check. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20261001145255.855630-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi --- drivers/acpi/reboot.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/reboot.c (limited to 'drivers/acpi/reboot.c') diff --git a/drivers/acpi/reboot.c b/drivers/acpi/reboot.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b79b7c99c --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/acpi/reboot.c @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: " fmt + +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI +static void acpi_pci_reboot(struct acpi_generic_address *rr, u8 reset_value) +{ + unsigned int devfn; + struct pci_bus *bus0; + + /* The reset register can only live on bus 0. */ + bus0 = pci_find_bus(0, 0); + if (!bus0) + return; + /* Form PCI device/function pair. */ + devfn = PCI_DEVFN((rr->address >> 32) & 0xffff, + (rr->address >> 16) & 0xffff); + pr_debug("Resetting with ACPI PCI RESET_REG.\n"); + /* Write the value that resets us. */ + pci_bus_write_config_byte(bus0, devfn, + (rr->address & 0xffff), reset_value); +} +#else +static inline void acpi_pci_reboot(struct acpi_generic_address *rr, + u8 reset_value) +{ + pr_warn_once("PCI configuration space access is not supported\n"); +} +#endif + +void acpi_reboot(void) +{ + struct acpi_generic_address *rr; + u8 reset_value; + + if (acpi_disabled) + return; + + rr = &acpi_gbl_FADT.reset_register; + + /* ACPI reset register was only introduced with v2 of the FADT */ + + if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision < 2) + return; + + /* Is the reset register supported? The spec says we should be + * checking the bit width and bit offset, but Windows ignores + * these fields */ + if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_RESET_REGISTER)) + return; + + reset_value = acpi_gbl_FADT.reset_value; + + /* The reset register can only exist in I/O, Memory or PCI config space + * on a device on bus 0. */ + switch (rr->space_id) { + case ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PCI_CONFIG: + acpi_pci_reboot(rr, reset_value); + break; + + case ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY: + case ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO: + pr_debug("ACPI MEMORY or I/O RESET_REG.\n"); + acpi_reset(); + break; + } + + /* + * Some platforms do not shut down immediately after writing to the + * ACPI reset register, and this results in racing with the + * subsequent reboot mechanism. + * + * The 15ms delay has been found to be long enough for the system + * to reboot on the affected platforms. + */ + mdelay(15); +} -- cgit v1.3.1