From 119e9db233ad0f4cbd4cfb9f9385a7bca378b37d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zeng Chi Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 18:24:42 +0800 Subject: KVM: Don't pre-reserve xarray entries when storing empty/NULL attributes Skip the xarray reservation loop when clearing all memory attributes, as storing NULL only erases the entry and never needs to allocate, so no reservation (and no cleanup of a failed one) is required in that case. Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson Cc: David Ballesteros Signed-off-by: Zeng Chi Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260921102442.1232375-1-zeng_chi911@163.com [sean: split to separate patch] Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c (limited to 'arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c') diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..04165b7a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later +/* + * Spin and read/write lock operations. + * + * Copyright (C) 2001-2004 Paul Mackerras , IBM + * Copyright (C) 2001 Anton Blanchard , IBM + * Copyright (C) 2002 Dave Engebretsen , IBM + * Rework to support virtual processors + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include + +/* waiting for a spinlock... */ +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR) +#include +#include + +void splpar_spin_yield(arch_spinlock_t *lock) +{ + unsigned int lock_value, holder_cpu, yield_count; + + lock_value = lock->slock; + if (lock_value == 0) + return; + holder_cpu = lock_value & 0xffff; + BUG_ON(holder_cpu >= NR_CPUS); + + yield_count = yield_count_of(holder_cpu); + if ((yield_count & 1) == 0) + return; /* virtual cpu is currently running */ + rmb(); + if (lock->slock != lock_value) + return; /* something has changed */ + yield_to_preempted(holder_cpu, yield_count); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(splpar_spin_yield); + +/* + * Waiting for a read lock or a write lock on a rwlock... + * This turns out to be the same for read and write locks, since + * we only know the holder if it is write-locked. + */ +void splpar_rw_yield(arch_rwlock_t *rw) +{ + int lock_value; + unsigned int holder_cpu, yield_count; + + lock_value = rw->lock; + if (lock_value >= 0) + return; /* no write lock at present */ + holder_cpu = lock_value & 0xffff; + BUG_ON(holder_cpu >= NR_CPUS); + + yield_count = yield_count_of(holder_cpu); + if ((yield_count & 1) == 0) + return; /* virtual cpu is currently running */ + rmb(); + if (rw->lock != lock_value) + return; /* something has changed */ + yield_to_preempted(holder_cpu, yield_count); +} +#endif -- cgit v1.3.1