From 34ff636f322c6d5e4f0a52338fa63a7dff09a495 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel Fernandes Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 13:15:36 -0400 Subject: scftorture: Count single_rpc offline failures in statistics output scf_torture_stats_print() aggregates each invoker thread's counters into a local scf_statistics structure before printing, but the n_single_rpc_ofl field is missing from the aggregation loop. As a result, the "single_rpc_ofl" value printed in the statistics line is always zero, even when smp_call_function_single() invocations for the RPC test have failed due to offline CPUs and been counted by the invoker threads. Add the missing accumulation so that the printed value reflects the actual counts. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- arch/mips/lib/delay.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/mips/lib/delay.c (limited to 'arch/mips/lib/delay.c') diff --git a/arch/mips/lib/delay.c b/arch/mips/lib/delay.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ccdb1fc1e --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/mips/lib/delay.c @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +/* + * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public + * License. See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive + * for more details. + * + * Copyright (C) 1994 by Waldorf Electronics + * Copyright (C) 1995 - 2000, 01, 03 by Ralf Baechle + * Copyright (C) 1999, 2000 Silicon Graphics, Inc. + * Copyright (C) 2007, 2014 Maciej W. Rozycki + */ +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include +#include + +#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_DADDI_WORKAROUNDS +#define GCC_DADDI_IMM_ASM() "I" +#else +#define GCC_DADDI_IMM_ASM() "r" +#endif + +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_PLAT_DELAY + +void __delay(unsigned long loops) +{ + __asm__ __volatile__ ( + " .set noreorder \n" + " .align 3 \n" + "1: bnez %0, 1b \n" + " " __stringify(LONG_SUBU) " %0, %1 \n" + " .set reorder \n" + : "=r" (loops) + : GCC_DADDI_IMM_ASM() (1), "0" (loops)); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay); + +/* + * Division by multiplication: you don't have to worry about + * loss of precision. + * + * Use only for very small delays ( < 1 msec). Should probably use a + * lookup table, really, as the multiplications take much too long with + * short delays. This is a "reasonable" implementation, though (and the + * first constant multiplications gets optimized away if the delay is + * a constant) + */ + +void __udelay(unsigned long us) +{ + unsigned int lpj = raw_current_cpu_data.udelay_val; + + __delay((us * 0x000010c7ull * HZ * lpj) >> 32); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__udelay); + +void __ndelay(unsigned long ns) +{ + unsigned int lpj = raw_current_cpu_data.udelay_val; + + __delay((ns * 0x00000005ull * HZ * lpj) >> 32); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ndelay); + +#endif -- cgit v1.3.1