From f146c7bc85a51f95c05e0f8173d484eb301ece78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Danilo Krummrich Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 18:52:04 +0200 Subject: PCI: Add pci_irq_type() to query the allocated interrupt type Add a helper that returns PCI_IRQ_MSIX, PCI_IRQ_MSI, or PCI_IRQ_INTX based on the interrupt type the PCI core selected after pci_alloc_irq_vectors(). Several drivers already open-code this check against pdev->msix_enabled and pdev->msi_enabled, or even open code this helper [1]. A common helper avoids the duplication and keeps drivers from accessing the bitfield directly (see also [2]). Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas Tested-by: John Hubbard Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1/source/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_pci_func.c#L196 [1] Inspired-by: John Hubbard Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DKKG2QM3YJYB.Z2H2B2UXJ75N@kernel.org/ [2] Reviewed-by: Gary Guo Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260813165234.620555-5-dakr@kernel.org [ Add missing pci_irq_type() stub for CONFIG_PCI=n. ] Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich --- arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 166 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c (limited to 'arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c') diff --git a/arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c b/arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..78b6850a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * linux/arch/alpha/lib/memcpy.c + * + * Copyright (C) 1995 Linus Torvalds + */ + +/* + * This is a reasonably optimized memcpy() routine. + */ + +/* + * Note that the C code is written to be optimized into good assembly. However, + * at this point gcc is unable to sanely compile "if (n >= 0)", resulting in a + * explicit compare against 0 (instead of just using the proper "blt reg, xx" or + * "bge reg, xx"). I hope alpha-gcc will be fixed to notice this eventually.. + */ + +#include +#include +#include + +/* + * This should be done in one go with ldq_u*2/mask/stq_u. Do it + * with a macro so that we can fix it up later.. + */ +#define ALIGN_DEST_TO8_UP(d,s,n) \ + while (d & 7) { \ + if (n <= 0) return; \ + n--; \ + *(char *) d = *(char *) s; \ + d++; s++; \ + } +#define ALIGN_DEST_TO8_DN(d,s,n) \ + while (d & 7) { \ + if (n <= 0) return; \ + n--; \ + d--; s--; \ + *(char *) d = *(char *) s; \ + } + +/* + * This should similarly be done with ldq_u*2/mask/stq. The destination + * is aligned, but we don't fill in a full quad-word + */ +#define DO_REST_UP(d,s,n) \ + while (n > 0) { \ + n--; \ + *(char *) d = *(char *) s; \ + d++; s++; \ + } +#define DO_REST_DN(d,s,n) \ + while (n > 0) { \ + n--; \ + d--; s--; \ + *(char *) d = *(char *) s; \ + } + +/* + * This should be done with ldq/mask/stq. The source and destination are + * aligned, but we don't fill in a full quad-word + */ +#define DO_REST_ALIGNED_UP(d,s,n) DO_REST_UP(d,s,n) +#define DO_REST_ALIGNED_DN(d,s,n) DO_REST_DN(d,s,n) + +/* + * This does unaligned memory copies. We want to avoid storing to + * an unaligned address, as that would do a read-modify-write cycle. + * We also want to avoid double-reading the unaligned reads. + * + * Note the ordering to try to avoid load (and address generation) latencies. + */ +static inline void __memcpy_unaligned_up (unsigned long d, unsigned long s, + long n) +{ + ALIGN_DEST_TO8_UP(d,s,n); + n -= 8; /* to avoid compare against 8 in the loop */ + if (n >= 0) { + unsigned long low_word, high_word; + __asm__("ldq_u %0,%1":"=r" (low_word):"m" (*(unsigned long *) s)); + do { + unsigned long tmp; + __asm__("ldq_u %0,%1":"=r" (high_word):"m" (*(unsigned long *)(s+8))); + n -= 8; + __asm__("extql %1,%2,%0" + :"=r" (low_word) + :"r" (low_word), "r" (s)); + __asm__("extqh %1,%2,%0" + :"=r" (tmp) + :"r" (high_word), "r" (s)); + s += 8; + *(unsigned long *) d = low_word | tmp; + d += 8; + low_word = high_word; + } while (n >= 0); + } + n += 8; + DO_REST_UP(d,s,n); +} + +static inline void __memcpy_unaligned_dn (unsigned long d, unsigned long s, + long n) +{ + /* I don't understand AXP assembler well enough for this. -Tim */ + s += n; + d += n; + while (n--) + * (char *) --d = * (char *) --s; +} + +/* + * Hmm.. Strange. The __asm__ here is there to make gcc use an integer register + * for the load-store. I don't know why, but it would seem that using a floating + * point register for the move seems to slow things down (very small difference, + * though). + * + * Note the ordering to try to avoid load (and address generation) latencies. + */ +static inline void __memcpy_aligned_up (unsigned long d, unsigned long s, + long n) +{ + ALIGN_DEST_TO8_UP(d,s,n); + n -= 8; + while (n >= 0) { + unsigned long tmp; + __asm__("ldq %0,%1":"=r" (tmp):"m" (*(unsigned long *) s)); + n -= 8; + s += 8; + *(unsigned long *) d = tmp; + d += 8; + } + n += 8; + DO_REST_ALIGNED_UP(d,s,n); +} +static inline void __memcpy_aligned_dn (unsigned long d, unsigned long s, + long n) +{ + s += n; + d += n; + ALIGN_DEST_TO8_DN(d,s,n); + n -= 8; + while (n >= 0) { + unsigned long tmp; + s -= 8; + __asm__("ldq %0,%1":"=r" (tmp):"m" (*(unsigned long *) s)); + n -= 8; + d -= 8; + *(unsigned long *) d = tmp; + } + n += 8; + DO_REST_ALIGNED_DN(d,s,n); +} + +#undef memcpy + +void * memcpy(void * dest, const void *src, size_t n) +{ + if (!(((unsigned long) dest ^ (unsigned long) src) & 7)) { + __memcpy_aligned_up ((unsigned long) dest, (unsigned long) src, + n); + return dest; + } + __memcpy_unaligned_up ((unsigned long) dest, (unsigned long) src, n); + return dest; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy); -- cgit v1.3.1