From 4310c6b8e75d6a47f7548e5948fbe6318aa4440a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:58:09 +0300
Subject: thunderbolt: Fix NULL dereference in tb_remove_work()

There is a slight race between tb_remove_work() and tb_domain_remove()
which leads to dereferencing a NULL tb->root_switch pointer inside
tb_free_unplugged_xdomains():

        Thread A                            Thread B

  tb_remove_work()
                                    tb_domain_remove()
                                      mutex_lock(&tb->lock)
                                      tb_stop()
                                        /* doesn't cancel a running callback */
                                        cancel_delayed_work(&tcm->remove_work)
                                        ...
                                        tb_switch_remove(tb->root_switch)
                                        tb->root_switch = NULL
                                      mutex_unlock(&tb->lock)
    mutex_lock(&tb->lock)
    ...
    /* without checking ->root_switch */
    tb_free_unplugged_xdomains(tb->root_switch)
    mutex_unlock(&tb->lock)

Commit a8937f35cf39 ("thunderbolt: Remove XDomain from the bus without
holding tb->lock") doesn't seem right to move tb_free_unplugged_xdomains()
out of the &tb->lock section and the check for tb->root_switch, in
particular.  It states:

  For this reason separate removing the XDomain from the topology data
  structures (where we need the lock) from unregistering the device from
  the bus (where remove callbacks of the drivers are being called).

tb_free_unplugged_xdomains() belongs to the former group of functions
requiring the lock.  And it also calls tb_xdomain_remove() which should
only be called with &tb->lock held.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace static
analysis tool.

Fixes: a8937f35cf39 ("thunderbolt: Remove XDomain from the bus without holding tb->lock")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
---
 Documentation/trace/function-graph-fold.vim | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/function-graph-fold.vim

(limited to 'Documentation/trace/function-graph-fold.vim')

diff --git a/Documentation/trace/function-graph-fold.vim b/Documentation/trace/function-graph-fold.vim
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0544b504c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/trace/function-graph-fold.vim
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+" Enable folding for ftrace function_graph traces.
+"
+" To use, :source this file while viewing a function_graph trace, or use vim's
+" -S option to load from the command-line together with a trace.  You can then
+" use the usual vim fold commands, such as "za", to open and close nested
+" functions.  While closed, a fold will show the total time taken for a call,
+" as would normally appear on the line with the closing brace.  Folded
+" functions will not include finish_task_switch(), so folding should remain
+" relatively sane even through a context switch.
+"
+" Note that this will almost certainly only work well with a
+" single-CPU trace (e.g. trace-cmd report --cpu 1).
+
+function! FunctionGraphFoldExpr(lnum)
+  let line = getline(a:lnum)
+  if line[-1:] == '{'
+    if line =~ 'finish_task_switch() {$'
+      return '>1'
+    endif
+    return 'a1'
+  elseif line[-1:] == '}'
+    return 's1'
+  else
+    return '='
+  endif
+endfunction
+
+function! FunctionGraphFoldText()
+  let s = split(getline(v:foldstart), '|', 1)
+  if getline(v:foldend+1) =~ 'finish_task_switch() {$'
+    let s[2] = ' task switch  '
+  else
+    let e = split(getline(v:foldend), '|', 1)
+    let s[2] = e[2]
+  endif
+  return join(s, '|')
+endfunction
+
+setlocal foldexpr=FunctionGraphFoldExpr(v:lnum)
+setlocal foldtext=FunctionGraphFoldText()
+setlocal foldcolumn=12
+setlocal foldmethod=expr
-- 
cgit v1.3.1