From 4352b8aee98005853aa63f57d6377282de17a33f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 13:28:57 -0700 Subject: Merge tag 'i3c/for-7.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/i3c/linux Pull I3C updates from Alexandre Belloni: "A new driver this cycle, for the AMD AXI I3C controller. There are also new features such as IBI wakeup support, SETAASA device discovery and ACPI support for the the DAA methods, meaning we can now communicate with the SPD devices on DDR5 modules. New driver: - AMD AXI I3C master controller Subsystem: - I3C Common Command Code (CCC) handling improvements, especially around GET CCCs - SETAASA device discovery support - ACPI support for all existing DAA methods like SETDASA, SETNEWDA as well as I2C devices on I3C bus - IBI-based wakeup support Drivers: - dw: SETAASA support - mipi-i3c-hci: advertise IBI wakeup capability, AMD_PT I3C controller support, PIO queue management support for HCI v1.2 - renesas: improve suspend to RAM support, add runtime PM support" * tag 'i3c/for-7.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/i3c/linux: (70 commits) i3c: dw: reduce do_daa time if there's no client i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Add support for AMD_PT I3C controller i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Add PIO queue management support for HCI v1.2 i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Fix missing STAT_IBI_STATUS_THLD in PIO mode i3c: dw: rename "pclk" to "apb" to match dt-binding i3c: dw: make struct dw_i3c_cmd smaller i3c: dw: use COMMAND_PORT_TRANSFER_ARG instead of hardcoding i3c: renesas: Don't register devices when ENTDAA times out i3c: master: dw-i3c-master: fix OD timing for first broadcast i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Advertise IBI wakeup capability i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Factor out i3c_hci_sysdev() i3c: mipi-i3c-hci-pci: Propagate I3C wakeup requirements to PCI i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices i3c: master: Add helper to query bus wakeup requirements i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs i3c: master: Support IBI-based wakeup capability i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_uevent() i3c: Make dev->desc locking assumptions explicit i3c: master: Fix use-after-free of master->this ... --- Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst (limited to 'Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst') diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst b/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..051f0d819 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +.. _coding_assistants: + +AI Coding Assistants +++++++++++++++++++++ + +This document provides guidance for AI tools and developers using AI +assistance when contributing to the Linux kernel. + +AI tools helping with Linux kernel development should follow the standard +kernel development process: + +* Documentation/process/development-process.rst +* Documentation/process/coding-style.rst +* Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst + +For guidelines on content generated by AI coding assistants see: + +* Documentation/process/generated-content.rst + +Licensing and Legal Requirements +================================ + +All contributions must comply with the kernel's licensing requirements: + +* All code must be compatible with GPL-2.0-only +* Use appropriate SPDX license identifiers +* See Documentation/process/license-rules.rst for details + +Signed-off-by and Developer Certificate of Origin +================================================= + +AI agents MUST NOT add Signed-off-by tags. Only humans can legally +certify the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO). The human submitter +is responsible for: + +* Reviewing all AI-generated code +* Ensuring compliance with licensing requirements +* Adding their own Signed-off-by tag to certify the DCO +* Taking full responsibility for the contribution + +Attribution +=========== + +When AI tools contribute to kernel development, proper attribution +helps track the evolving role of AI in the development process. +Contributions should include an Assisted-by tag in the following format:: + + Assisted-by: LLM [TOOL1] [TOOL2] + +* ``[TOOL1] [TOOL2]`` are optional specialized analysis tools used + (e.g., coccinelle, sparse, smatch, clang-tidy) + +Basic development tools (git, gcc, make, editors) should not be listed. + +Example:: + + Assisted-by: LLM coccinelle sparse + +Procedure for finding and fixing bugs +===================================== + +When an AI assistant is used to find and fix bugs, it **MUST** follow at least +these steps: + +1. Before starting, read the whole process documentation listed above, as well + as any other document mentioned in the request. Do not rely on isolated + parts found by keyword search. +2. Note the commit ID and Locate a bug as instructed. +3. For any bug found that is not trivial, verify that it looks real by + attempting to create a reproducer to demonstrate it. Lacking it may cause + the report to be ignored, as many unverified bug reports sent to maintainers + happen to be invalid. Stop here if it finally looks wrong. +4. Write a fix for the bug. This part is not optional: except in a few very + rare cases, an AI assistant able to find a bug is able to fix it. Note that + fixes written in the same session as used to find the bug will generally + lead to better and more accurate fixes as the LLM's reasoning context + remains present. +5. Build and verify that the fix works either using the reproducer or by + re-running a complete analysis; drop any fix that doesn't work and try + another one. The fix must not add build warnings and must pass the + checkpatch.pl checks (see submitting-patches.rst). +6. Commit the working fix with a detailed message describing the problem, the + solution and a Fixes tag. Do not add a Signed-off-by tag, and add an + Assisted-by tag, as described above. +7. Identify the maintainers and lists using scripts/get_maintainer.pl. + Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst shows how to do that. +8. Indicate what could not be done. If the fix could not be built or tested, or + if no reproducer could be produced, say so explicitly: maintainers currently + waste too much time analyzing unverified reports and untested fixes. +9. Read Documentation/process/threat-model.rst to determine whether the bug is + a vulnerability or a regular bug, and leave the result to the reporter for + review (the assistant must never send anything itself). Regular bugs are + submitted as described in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst, + vulnerabilities as described in Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst. -- cgit v1.3.1