From 0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Chen Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 17:37:22 -0700 Subject: sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain, to fix LLC mis-scheduling bug alb_break_llc() decides whether to break LLC preference during active load balance. It does so by testing that every runnable fair task on the source rq prefers its LLC: env->src_rq->nr_pref_llc_running == env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable But the two counters cover different sets. nr_pref_llc_running is updated in account_llc_enqueue()/account_llc_dequeue(), next to cfs_rq->nr_queued, so it follows queued tasks. h_nr_runnable is updated in set_delayed()/ clear_delayed() and drops delay-dequeued tasks. So under DELAY_DEQUEUE, a preferring task that goes to sleep stays counted in nr_pref_llc_running while h_nr_runnable falls. The equality then breaks, alb_break_llc() returns false, and active balance is free to pull a task off its preferred LLC. Active balance only moves runnable tasks, and this is the only LLC check it consults: once the stopper runs, LBF_ACTIVE_LB skips the per-task test in can_migrate_task(). The runnable set is the one we want. Fix it on the counter side. A task should be counted in nr_pref_llc_running exactly while it is both queued on its preferred LLC (pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed). Define that membership once in task_pref_llc_runnable(), and adjust the counter only through pref_llc_running_inc()/pref_llc_running_dec() from the four sites that change either input: account_llc_enqueue(), account_llc_dequeue(), set_delayed() and clear_delayed(). Gating every update on the same predicate keeps the delay, wake and dequeue paths from double-counting or underflowing; see the comments at those sites for the ordering. nr_llc_running and sd->llc_counts are not touched and stay on queued semantics. Fixes: 714059f79ff0 ("sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260827135000.735138-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com/ Reported-by: Zhan Xusheng Suggested-by: Chen Yu Signed-off-by: Tim Chen Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Reviewed-by: Kayra Cizmeci Cc: # v7.2.x Link: https://patch.msgid.link/06af61afedac32e6477f57feb4d658f6c411c3af.1790035273.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com --- Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst (limited to 'Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst') diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst b/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..051f0d819 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +.. _coding_assistants: + +AI Coding Assistants +++++++++++++++++++++ + +This document provides guidance for AI tools and developers using AI +assistance when contributing to the Linux kernel. + +AI tools helping with Linux kernel development should follow the standard +kernel development process: + +* Documentation/process/development-process.rst +* Documentation/process/coding-style.rst +* Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst + +For guidelines on content generated by AI coding assistants see: + +* Documentation/process/generated-content.rst + +Licensing and Legal Requirements +================================ + +All contributions must comply with the kernel's licensing requirements: + +* All code must be compatible with GPL-2.0-only +* Use appropriate SPDX license identifiers +* See Documentation/process/license-rules.rst for details + +Signed-off-by and Developer Certificate of Origin +================================================= + +AI agents MUST NOT add Signed-off-by tags. Only humans can legally +certify the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO). The human submitter +is responsible for: + +* Reviewing all AI-generated code +* Ensuring compliance with licensing requirements +* Adding their own Signed-off-by tag to certify the DCO +* Taking full responsibility for the contribution + +Attribution +=========== + +When AI tools contribute to kernel development, proper attribution +helps track the evolving role of AI in the development process. +Contributions should include an Assisted-by tag in the following format:: + + Assisted-by: LLM [TOOL1] [TOOL2] + +* ``[TOOL1] [TOOL2]`` are optional specialized analysis tools used + (e.g., coccinelle, sparse, smatch, clang-tidy) + +Basic development tools (git, gcc, make, editors) should not be listed. + +Example:: + + Assisted-by: LLM coccinelle sparse + +Procedure for finding and fixing bugs +===================================== + +When an AI assistant is used to find and fix bugs, it **MUST** follow at least +these steps: + +1. Before starting, read the whole process documentation listed above, as well + as any other document mentioned in the request. Do not rely on isolated + parts found by keyword search. +2. Note the commit ID and Locate a bug as instructed. +3. For any bug found that is not trivial, verify that it looks real by + attempting to create a reproducer to demonstrate it. Lacking it may cause + the report to be ignored, as many unverified bug reports sent to maintainers + happen to be invalid. Stop here if it finally looks wrong. +4. Write a fix for the bug. This part is not optional: except in a few very + rare cases, an AI assistant able to find a bug is able to fix it. Note that + fixes written in the same session as used to find the bug will generally + lead to better and more accurate fixes as the LLM's reasoning context + remains present. +5. Build and verify that the fix works either using the reproducer or by + re-running a complete analysis; drop any fix that doesn't work and try + another one. The fix must not add build warnings and must pass the + checkpatch.pl checks (see submitting-patches.rst). +6. Commit the working fix with a detailed message describing the problem, the + solution and a Fixes tag. Do not add a Signed-off-by tag, and add an + Assisted-by tag, as described above. +7. Identify the maintainers and lists using scripts/get_maintainer.pl. + Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst shows how to do that. +8. Indicate what could not be done. If the fix could not be built or tested, or + if no reproducer could be produced, say so explicitly: maintainers currently + waste too much time analyzing unverified reports and untested fixes. +9. Read Documentation/process/threat-model.rst to determine whether the bug is + a vulnerability or a regular bug, and leave the result to the reporter for + review (the assistant must never send anything itself). Regular bugs are + submitted as described in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst, + vulnerabilities as described in Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst. -- cgit v1.3.1