From 4617721c502b2ddaa4e324e86da4997edf738fa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 09:55:01 -0400 Subject: ftrace: Synchronize the initialization of ftrace_ops There's some internal state that ftrace_ops needs to have set, but since it can be declared outside of the ftrace.c code, it calls ftrace_ops_init() on the ops in every global function. The issue is that if two tasks call it on the same ops at the same time it is possible to have the initialization of one corrupt the initialization of the other call. Create a ops_mutex to use to synchronize every initialization of the ftrace_ops. The mutex is taken within checking the ftrace_ops flag that states it was initializied but the flag is checked again after the mutex has been taken. Checking first outside the mutex allows it to shortcut having to take the mutex. But then the check needs to be done again after the mute is taken in case of races. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260902095501.6b59af20@gandalf.local.home Fixes: f04f24fb7e48d ("ftrace, kprobes: Fix a deadlock on ftrace_regex_lock") Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Close: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260829025528.49A831F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- Documentation/networking/multi-pf-netdev.rst | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 174 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/multi-pf-netdev.rst (limited to 'Documentation/networking/multi-pf-netdev.rst') diff --git a/Documentation/networking/multi-pf-netdev.rst b/Documentation/networking/multi-pf-netdev.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2f5a5bb3c --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/networking/multi-pf-netdev.rst @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +.. include:: + +=============== +Multi-PF Netdev +=============== + +Contents +======== + +- `Background`_ +- `Overview`_ +- `mlx5 implementation`_ +- `Channels distribution`_ +- `Observability`_ +- `Steering`_ +- `Mutually exclusive features`_ + +Background +========== + +The Multi-PF NIC technology enables several CPUs within a multi-socket server to connect directly to +the network, each through its own dedicated PCIe interface. Through either a connection harness that +splits the PCIe lanes between two cards or by bifurcating a PCIe slot for a single card. This +results in eliminating the network traffic traversing over the internal bus between the sockets, +significantly reducing overhead and latency, in addition to reducing CPU utilization and increasing +network throughput. + +Overview +======== + +The feature adds support for combining multiple PFs of the same port in a Multi-PF environment under +one netdev instance. It is implemented in the netdev layer. Lower-layer instances like pci func, +sysfs entry, and devlink are kept separate. +Passing traffic through different devices belonging to different NUMA sockets saves cross-NUMA +traffic and allows apps running on the same netdev from different NUMAs to still feel a sense of +proximity to the device and achieve improved performance. + +mlx5 implementation +=================== + +Multi-PF or Socket-direct in mlx5 is achieved by grouping PFs together which belong to the same +NIC and has the socket-direct property enabled, once all PFs are probed, we create a single netdev +to represent all of them, symmetrically, we destroy the netdev whenever any of the PFs is removed. + +The netdev network channels are distributed between all devices, a proper configuration would utilize +the correct close NUMA node when working on a certain app/CPU. + +We pick one PF to be a primary (leader), and it fills a special role. The other devices +(secondaries) are disconnected from the network at the chip level (set to silent mode). In silent +mode, no south <-> north traffic flowing directly through a secondary PF. It needs the assistance of +the leader PF (east <-> west traffic) to function. All Rx/Tx traffic is steered through the primary +to/from the secondaries. + +Currently, we limit the support to PFs only, and up to two PFs (sockets). + +Channels distribution +===================== + +We distribute the channels between the different PFs to achieve local NUMA node performance +on multiple NUMA nodes. + +Each combined channel works against one specific PF, creating all its datapath queues against it. We +distribute channels to PFs in a round-robin policy. + +:: + + Example for 2 PFs and 5 channels: + +--------+--------+ + | ch idx | PF idx | + +--------+--------+ + | 0 | 0 | + | 1 | 1 | + | 2 | 0 | + | 3 | 1 | + | 4 | 0 | + +--------+--------+ + + +The reason we prefer round-robin is, it is less influenced by changes in the number of channels. The +mapping between a channel index and a PF is fixed, no matter how many channels the user configures. +As the channel stats are persistent across channel's closure, changing the mapping every single time +would turn the accumulative stats less representing of the channel's history. + +This is achieved by using the correct core device instance (mdev) in each channel, instead of them +all using the same instance under "priv->mdev". + +Observability +============= +The relation between PF, irq, napi, and queue can be observed via netlink spec:: + + $ ./tools/net/ynl/pyynl/cli.py --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml --dump queue-get --json='{"ifindex": 13}' + [{'id': 0, 'ifindex': 13, 'napi-id': 539, 'type': 'rx'}, + {'id': 1, 'ifindex': 13, 'napi-id': 540, 'type': 'rx'}, + {'id': 2, 'ifindex': 13, 'napi-id': 541, 'type': 'rx'}, + {'id': 3, 'ifindex': 13, 'napi-id': 542, 'type': 'rx'}, + {'id': 4, 'ifindex': 13, 'napi-id': 543, 'type': 'rx'}, + {'id': 0, 'ifindex': 13, 'napi-id': 539, 'type': 'tx'}, + {'id': 1, 'ifindex': 13, 'napi-id': 540, 'type': 'tx'}, + {'id': 2, 'ifindex': 13, 'napi-id': 541, 'type': 'tx'}, + {'id': 3, 'ifindex': 13, 'napi-id': 542, 'type': 'tx'}, + {'id': 4, 'ifindex': 13, 'napi-id': 543, 'type': 'tx'}] + + $ ./tools/net/ynl/pyynl/cli.py --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml --dump napi-get --json='{"ifindex": 13}' + [{'id': 543, 'ifindex': 13, 'irq': 42}, + {'id': 542, 'ifindex': 13, 'irq': 41}, + {'id': 541, 'ifindex': 13, 'irq': 40}, + {'id': 540, 'ifindex': 13, 'irq': 39}, + {'id': 539, 'ifindex': 13, 'irq': 36}] + +Here you can clearly observe our channels distribution policy:: + + $ ls /proc/irq/{36,39,40,41,42}/mlx5* -d -1 + /proc/irq/36/mlx5_comp0@pci:0000:08:00.0 + /proc/irq/39/mlx5_comp0@pci:0000:09:00.0 + /proc/irq/40/mlx5_comp1@pci:0000:08:00.0 + /proc/irq/41/mlx5_comp1@pci:0000:09:00.0 + /proc/irq/42/mlx5_comp2@pci:0000:08:00.0 + +Steering +======== +Secondary PFs are set to "silent" mode, meaning they are disconnected from the network. + +In Rx, the steering tables belong to the primary PF only, and it is its role to distribute incoming +traffic to other PFs, via cross-vhca steering capabilities. Still maintain a single default RSS table, +that is capable of pointing to the receive queues of a different PF. + +In Tx, the primary PF creates a new Tx flow table, which is aliased by the secondaries, so they can +go out to the network through it. + +In addition, we set default XPS configuration that, based on the CPU, selects an SQ belonging to the +PF on the same node as the CPU. + +XPS default config example: + +NUMA node(s): 2 +NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-11 +NUMA node1 CPU(s): 12-23 + +PF0 on node0, PF1 on node1. + +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-0/xps_cpus:000001 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-1/xps_cpus:001000 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-2/xps_cpus:000002 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-3/xps_cpus:002000 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-4/xps_cpus:000004 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-5/xps_cpus:004000 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-6/xps_cpus:000008 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-7/xps_cpus:008000 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-8/xps_cpus:000010 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-9/xps_cpus:010000 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-10/xps_cpus:000020 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-11/xps_cpus:020000 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-12/xps_cpus:000040 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-13/xps_cpus:040000 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-14/xps_cpus:000080 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-15/xps_cpus:080000 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-16/xps_cpus:000100 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-17/xps_cpus:100000 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-18/xps_cpus:000200 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-19/xps_cpus:200000 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-20/xps_cpus:000400 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-21/xps_cpus:400000 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-22/xps_cpus:000800 +- /sys/class/net/eth2/queues/tx-23/xps_cpus:800000 + +Mutually exclusive features +=========================== + +The nature of Multi-PF, where different channels work with different PFs, conflicts with +stateful features where the state is maintained in one of the PFs. +For example, in the TLS device-offload feature, special context objects are created per connection +and maintained in the PF. Transitioning between different RQs/SQs would break the feature. Hence, +we disable this combination for now. -- cgit v1.3.1