From a9ed3aa9b87ee41e8ab3ff471b1331c154767e45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Airlie Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2026 07:57:59 +1000 Subject: Merge tag 'drm-misc-fixes-2026-09-24' of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc/kernel into drm-fixes A number of fixes: - bridge: - samsung-dsim: fix GPIO lifetime - client: Null pointer dereference fix - imagination: error handling fix, page handling fix - nouveau: fix reference leaks, double-frees, out-of-bounds accesses, use-after-frees, don't reject config without SCDC, a number of workarounds - virtio: fix memory leak, reference leaks, null pointer dereference, add pixel blend mode, cache coherency fix Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie From: Maxime Ripard Link: https://patch.msgid.link/arU22zzqUGDEco1y@houat --- Documentation/networking/ipsec.rst | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/ipsec.rst (limited to 'Documentation/networking/ipsec.rst') diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ipsec.rst b/Documentation/networking/ipsec.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..afe9d7b48 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/networking/ipsec.rst @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +===== +IPsec +===== + + +Here documents known IPsec corner cases which need to be keep in mind when +deploy various IPsec configuration in real world production environment. + +1. IPcomp: + Small IP packet won't get compressed at sender, and failed on + policy check on receiver. + +Quote from RFC3173:: + + 2.2. Non-Expansion Policy + + If the total size of a compressed payload and the IPComp header, as + defined in section 3, is not smaller than the size of the original + payload, the IP datagram MUST be sent in the original non-compressed + form. To clarify: If an IP datagram is sent non-compressed, no + + IPComp header is added to the datagram. This policy ensures saving + the decompression processing cycles and avoiding incurring IP + datagram fragmentation when the expanded datagram is larger than the + MTU. + + Small IP datagrams are likely to expand as a result of compression. + Therefore, a numeric threshold should be applied before compression, + where IP datagrams of size smaller than the threshold are sent in the + original form without attempting compression. The numeric threshold + is implementation dependent. + +Current IPComp implementation is indeed by the book, while as in practice +when sending non-compressed packet to the peer (whether or not packet len +is smaller than the threshold or the compressed len is larger than original +packet len), the packet is dropped when checking the policy as this packet +matches the selector but not coming from any XFRM layer, i.e., with no +security path. Such naked packet will not eventually make it to upper layer. +The result is much more wired to the user when ping peer with different +payload length. + +One workaround is try to set "level use" for each policy if user observed +above scenario. The consequence of doing so is small packet(uncompressed) +will skip policy checking on receiver side. -- cgit v1.3.1