From a5f7a5bb3b7f28ba7e4fa246775b29a0e5537255 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jinke Han Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 15:37:42 +0800 Subject: x86/kprobes: Fix crash when probing CS CALL instructions When using eBPF to probe CS CALL instructions within a function, a crash can be triggered. The eBPF tool probes offset 257 of the __hrtimer_run_queues() function: <__hrtimer_run_queues+249>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) <__hrtimer_run_queues+254>: mov %r14,%rdi <__hrtimer_run_queues+257>: cs call <__x86_indirect_thunk_r12> <__hrtimer_run_queues+263>: mov %eax,%r12d <__hrtimer_run_queues+266>: xchg %ax,%ax <__hrtimer_run_queues+268>: mov %r13,%rdi Which triggers this crash: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000f41c9 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: P RIP: 0010:__hrtimer_run_queues+0x106/0x230 Note that __hrtimer_run_queues+0x106 is __hrtimer_run_queues+262, which is at the 6th byte of the above CS CALL instruction. Since the CS CALL instruction occupies 6 bytes, the exception occurred in the middle of that call instruction. The root cause is that when using eBPF tools to probe in the middle of a function, a kprobe with INT3 is used as the underlying implementation. During single-step emulation of the original CALL instruction, int3_emulate_call() assumes that the probed CALL instruction is 5 bytes long. However, the actual CS-prefixed CALL instruction occupies 6 bytes, so it constructs an incorrect exception return address. When the CPU returns from the kprobe handler, the next instruction to be executed is at the address of the last byte of that CS CALL instruction. Coincidentally, starting from that address, the CPU fetches and decodes a completely different instruction, which ultimately triggers a kernel crash. Fix the issue by using the actual instruction length obtained from the instruction decoder when constructing the exception return address, rather than relying on the hardcoded CALL_INSN_SIZE macro. [ mingo: Refined the changelog ] Fixes: 6256e668b7af ("x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step") Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Signed-off-by: Jinke Han Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Acked-by: Yafang Shao Acked-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260908073742.GA10517@didi-ThinkCentre-M920t-N000 --- Documentation/maintainer/messy-diffstat.rst | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/maintainer/messy-diffstat.rst (limited to 'Documentation/maintainer/messy-diffstat.rst') diff --git a/Documentation/maintainer/messy-diffstat.rst b/Documentation/maintainer/messy-diffstat.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c015f66d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/maintainer/messy-diffstat.rst @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +===================================== +Handling messy pull-request diffstats +===================================== + +Subsystem maintainers routinely use ``git request-pull`` as part of the +process of sending work upstream. Normally, the result includes a nice +diffstat that shows which files will be touched and how much of each will +be changed. Occasionally, though, a repository with a relatively +complicated development history will yield a massive diffstat containing a +great deal of unrelated work. The result looks ugly and obscures what the +pull request is actually doing. This document describes what is happening +and how to fix things up; it is derived from The Wisdom of Linus Torvalds, +found in Linus1_ and Linus2_. + +.. _Linus1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wg3wXH2JNxkQi+eLZkpuxqV+wPiHhw_Jf7ViH33Sw7PHA@mail.gmail.com/ +.. _Linus2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wgXbSa8yq8Dht8at+gxb_idnJ7X5qWZQWRBN4_CUPr=eQ@mail.gmail.com/ + +A Git development history proceeds as a series of commits. In a simplified +manner, mainline kernel development looks like this:: + + ... vM --- vN-rc1 --- vN-rc2 --- vN-rc3 --- ... --- vN-rc7 --- vN + +If one wants to see what has changed between two points, a command like +this will do the job:: + + $ git diff --stat --summary vN-rc2..vN-rc3 + +Here, there are two clear points in the history; Git will essentially +"subtract" the beginning point from the end point and display the resulting +differences. The requested operation is unambiguous and easy enough to +understand. + +When a subsystem maintainer creates a branch and commits changes to it, the +result in the simplest case is a history that looks like:: + + ... vM --- vN-rc1 --- vN-rc2 --- vN-rc3 --- ... --- vN-rc7 --- vN + | + +-- c1 --- c2 --- ... --- cN + +If that maintainer now uses ``git diff`` to see what has changed between +the mainline branch (let's call it "linus") and cN, there are still two +clear endpoints, and the result is as expected. So a pull request +generated with ``git request-pull`` will also be as expected. But now +consider a slightly more complex development history:: + + ... vM --- vN-rc1 --- vN-rc2 --- vN-rc3 --- ... --- vN-rc7 --- vN + | | + | +-- c1 --- c2 --- ... --- cN + | / + +-- x1 --- x2 --- x3 + +Our maintainer has created one branch at vN-rc1 and another at vN-rc2; the +two were then subsequently merged into c2. Now a pull request generated +for cN may end up being messy indeed, and developers often end up wondering +why. + +What is happening here is that there are no longer two clear end points for +the ``git diff`` operation to use. The development culminating in cN +started in two different places; to generate the diffstat, ``git diff`` +ends up having pick one of them and hoping for the best. If the diffstat +starts at vN-rc1, it may end up including all of the changes between there +and the second origin end point (vN-rc2), which is certainly not what our +maintainer had in mind. With all of that extra junk in the diffstat, it +may be impossible to tell what actually happened in the changes leading up +to cN. + +Maintainers often try to resolve this problem by, for example, rebasing the +branch or performing another merge with the linus branch, then recreating +the pull request. This approach tends not to lead to joy at the receiving +end of that pull request; rebasing and/or merging just before pushing +upstream is a well-known way to get a grumpy response. + +So what is to be done? The best response when confronted with this +situation is to indeed to do a merge with the branch you intend your work +to be pulled into, but to do it privately, as if it were the source of +shame. Create a new, throwaway branch and do the merge there:: + + ... vM --- vN-rc1 --- vN-rc2 --- vN-rc3 --- ... --- vN-rc7 --- vN + | | | + | +-- c1 --- c2 --- ... --- cN | + | / | | + +-- x1 --- x2 --- x3 +------------+-- TEMP + +The merge operation resolves all of the complications resulting from the +multiple beginning points, yielding a coherent result that contains only +the differences from the mainline branch. Now it will be possible to +generate a diffstat with the desired information:: + + $ git diff -C --stat --summary linus..TEMP + +Save the output from this command, then simply delete the TEMP branch; +definitely do not expose it to the outside world. Take the saved diffstat +output and edit it into the messy pull request, yielding a result that +shows what is really going on. That request can then be sent upstream. -- cgit v1.3.1