From 0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Chen Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 17:37:22 -0700 Subject: sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain, to fix LLC mis-scheduling bug alb_break_llc() decides whether to break LLC preference during active load balance. It does so by testing that every runnable fair task on the source rq prefers its LLC: env->src_rq->nr_pref_llc_running == env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable But the two counters cover different sets. nr_pref_llc_running is updated in account_llc_enqueue()/account_llc_dequeue(), next to cfs_rq->nr_queued, so it follows queued tasks. h_nr_runnable is updated in set_delayed()/ clear_delayed() and drops delay-dequeued tasks. So under DELAY_DEQUEUE, a preferring task that goes to sleep stays counted in nr_pref_llc_running while h_nr_runnable falls. The equality then breaks, alb_break_llc() returns false, and active balance is free to pull a task off its preferred LLC. Active balance only moves runnable tasks, and this is the only LLC check it consults: once the stopper runs, LBF_ACTIVE_LB skips the per-task test in can_migrate_task(). The runnable set is the one we want. Fix it on the counter side. A task should be counted in nr_pref_llc_running exactly while it is both queued on its preferred LLC (pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed). Define that membership once in task_pref_llc_runnable(), and adjust the counter only through pref_llc_running_inc()/pref_llc_running_dec() from the four sites that change either input: account_llc_enqueue(), account_llc_dequeue(), set_delayed() and clear_delayed(). Gating every update on the same predicate keeps the delay, wake and dequeue paths from double-counting or underflowing; see the comments at those sites for the ordering. nr_llc_running and sd->llc_counts are not touched and stay on queued semantics. Fixes: 714059f79ff0 ("sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260827135000.735138-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com/ Reported-by: Zhan Xusheng Suggested-by: Chen Yu Signed-off-by: Tim Chen Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Reviewed-by: Kayra Cizmeci Cc: # v7.2.x Link: https://patch.msgid.link/06af61afedac32e6477f57feb4d658f6c411c3af.1790035273.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com --- Documentation/driver-api/soundwire/locking.rst | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/soundwire/locking.rst (limited to 'Documentation/driver-api/soundwire/locking.rst') diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/soundwire/locking.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/soundwire/locking.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3a7ffb3d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/soundwire/locking.rst @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +================= +SoundWire Locking +================= + +This document explains locking mechanism of the SoundWire Bus. Bus uses +following locks in order to avoid race conditions in Bus operations on +shared resources. + + - Bus lock + + - Message lock + +Bus lock +======== + +SoundWire Bus lock is a mutex and is part of Bus data structure +(sdw_bus) which is used for every Bus instance. This lock is used to +serialize each of the following operations(s) within SoundWire Bus instance. + + - Addition and removal of Slave(s), changing Slave status. + + - Prepare, Enable, Disable and De-prepare stream operations. + + - Access of Stream data structure. + +Message lock +============ + +SoundWire message transfer lock. This mutex is part of +Bus data structure (sdw_bus). This lock is used to serialize the message +transfers (read/write) within a SoundWire Bus instance. + +Below examples show how locks are acquired. + +Example 1 +--------- + +Message transfer. + + 1. For every message transfer + + a. Acquire Message lock. + + b. Transfer message (Read/Write) to Slave1 or broadcast message on + Bus in case of bank switch. + + c. Release Message lock + + :: + + +----------+ +---------+ + | | | | + | Bus | | Master | + | | | Driver | + | | | | + +----+-----+ +----+----+ + | | + | bus->ops->xfer_msg() | + <-------------------------------+ a. Acquire Message lock + | | b. Transfer message + | | + +-------------------------------> c. Release Message lock + | return success/error | d. Return success/error + | | + + + + +Example 2 +--------- + +Prepare operation. + + 1. Acquire lock for Bus instance associated with Master 1. + + 2. For every message transfer in Prepare operation + + a. Acquire Message lock. + + b. Transfer message (Read/Write) to Slave1 or broadcast message on + Bus in case of bank switch. + + c. Release Message lock. + + 3. Release lock for Bus instance associated with Master 1 :: + + +----------+ +---------+ + | | | | + | Bus | | Master | + | | | Driver | + | | | | + +----+-----+ +----+----+ + | | + | sdw_prepare_stream() | + <-------------------------------+ 1. Acquire bus lock + | | 2. Perform stream prepare + | | + | | + | bus->ops->xfer_msg() | + <-------------------------------+ a. Acquire Message lock + | | b. Transfer message + | | + +-------------------------------> c. Release Message lock + | return success/error | d. Return success/error + | | + | | + | return success/error | 3. Release bus lock + +-------------------------------> 4. Return success/error + | | + + + -- cgit v1.3.1