From 4617721c502b2ddaa4e324e86da4997edf738fa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 09:55:01 -0400 Subject: ftrace: Synchronize the initialization of ftrace_ops There's some internal state that ftrace_ops needs to have set, but since it can be declared outside of the ftrace.c code, it calls ftrace_ops_init() on the ops in every global function. The issue is that if two tasks call it on the same ops at the same time it is possible to have the initialization of one corrupt the initialization of the other call. Create a ops_mutex to use to synchronize every initialization of the ftrace_ops. The mutex is taken within checking the ftrace_ops flag that states it was initializied but the flag is checked again after the mutex has been taken. Checking first outside the mutex allows it to shortcut having to take the mutex. But then the check needs to be done again after the mute is taken in case of races. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260902095501.6b59af20@gandalf.local.home Fixes: f04f24fb7e48d ("ftrace, kprobes: Fix a deadlock on ftrace_regex_lock") Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Close: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260829025528.49A831F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- Documentation/bpf/linux-notes.rst | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/bpf/linux-notes.rst (limited to 'Documentation/bpf/linux-notes.rst') diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/linux-notes.rst b/Documentation/bpf/linux-notes.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..00d2693de --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/bpf/linux-notes.rst @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +.. contents:: +.. sectnum:: + +========================== +Linux implementation notes +========================== + +This document provides more details specific to the Linux kernel implementation of the eBPF instruction set. + +Byte swap instructions +====================== + +``BPF_FROM_LE`` and ``BPF_FROM_BE`` exist as aliases for ``BPF_TO_LE`` and ``BPF_TO_BE`` respectively. + +Jump instructions +================= + +``BPF_CALL | BPF_X | BPF_JMP`` (0x8d), where the helper function +integer would be read from a specified register, is not currently supported +by the verifier. Any programs with this instruction will fail to load +until such support is added. + +Maps +==== + +Linux only supports the 'map_val(map)' operation on array maps with a single element. + +Linux uses an fd_array to store maps associated with a BPF program. Thus, +map_by_idx(imm) uses the fd at that index in the array. + +Variables +========= + +The following 64-bit immediate instruction specifies that a variable address, +which corresponds to some integer stored in the 'imm' field, should be loaded: + +========================= ====== === ========================================= =========== ============== +opcode construction opcode src pseudocode imm type dst type +========================= ====== === ========================================= =========== ============== +BPF_IMM | BPF_DW | BPF_LD 0x18 0x3 dst = var_addr(imm) variable id data pointer +========================= ====== === ========================================= =========== ============== + +On Linux, this integer is a BTF ID. + +Legacy BPF Packet access instructions +===================================== + +As mentioned in the `ISA standard documentation +`_, +Linux has special eBPF instructions for access to packet data that have been +carried over from classic BPF to retain the performance of legacy socket +filters running in the eBPF interpreter. + +The instructions come in two forms: ``BPF_ABS | | BPF_LD`` and +``BPF_IND | | BPF_LD``. + +These instructions are used to access packet data and can only be used when +the program context is a pointer to a networking packet. ``BPF_ABS`` +accesses packet data at an absolute offset specified by the immediate data +and ``BPF_IND`` access packet data at an offset that includes the value of +a register in addition to the immediate data. + +These instructions have seven implicit operands: + +* Register R6 is an implicit input that must contain a pointer to a + struct sk_buff. +* Register R0 is an implicit output which contains the data fetched from + the packet. +* Registers R1-R5 are scratch registers that are clobbered by the + instruction. + +These instructions have an implicit program exit condition as well. If an +eBPF program attempts access data beyond the packet boundary, the +program execution will be aborted. + +``BPF_ABS | BPF_W | BPF_LD`` (0x20) means:: + + R0 = ntohl(*(u32 *) ((struct sk_buff *) R6->data + imm)) + +where ``ntohl()`` converts a 32-bit value from network byte order to host byte order. + +``BPF_IND | BPF_W | BPF_LD`` (0x40) means:: + + R0 = ntohl(*(u32 *) ((struct sk_buff *) R6->data + src + imm)) -- cgit v1.3.1